@@ -704,14 +704,17 @@ nv50_msto_cleanup(struct nv50_msto *msto)
struct nv50_mstc *mstc = msto->mstc;
struct nv50_mstm *mstm = mstc->mstm;
+ if (!msto->disabled)
+ return;
+
NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto cleanup\n", msto->encoder.name);
- if (mstc->port && mstc->port->vcpi.vcpi > 0 && !nv50_msto_payload(msto))
+
+ if (mstc->port)
drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(&mstm->mgr, mstc->port);
- if (msto->disabled) {
- msto->mstc = NULL;
- msto->head = NULL;
- msto->disabled = false;
- }
+
+ msto->mstc = NULL;
+ msto->head = NULL;
+ msto->disabled = false;
}
static void
There is no need to look at the port's VCPI allocation before calling drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(), as we already have msto->disabled to let us avoid cleaning up an msto more then once. The DP MST core will never call drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi() on it's own, which is presumably what these checks are meant to protect against. More importantly though, we're about to stop clearing mstc->port in the next commit, which means if we could potentially hit a use-after-free error if we tried to check mstc->port->vcpi here. So to make life easier for anyone who bisects this code in the future, use msto->disabled instead to check whether or not we need to deallocate VCPI instead. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Cc: Jerry Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)