Message ID | 20190707181937.6250-18-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/omap: Replace custom display drivers with drm_bridge and drm_panel | expand |
Hi Laurent. Third panel driver in line for review. Review comments that are duplicates from the first two will have only a brief remark - if any. On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 09:18:58PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > This panel is used on the SDP3430. Add a little more context and put it in Kconfig help. Maybe this is the TI board, and maybe it is something else. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 7 + > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile | 1 + > .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c | 231 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 239 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig > index da613c04b835..04fd152efe4c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig > @@ -271,6 +271,13 @@ config DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS043T1LE01 > Say Y here if you want to enable support for Sharp LS043T1LE01 qHD > (540x960) DSI panel as found on the Qualcomm APQ8074 Dragonboard > > +config DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01 > + tristate "Sharp LS037V7DW01 VGA LCD panel" > + depends on GPIOLIB && OF && REGULATOR > + help > + Say Y here if you want to enable support for Sharp LS037V7DW01 VGA > + (480x640) LCD panel. > + Alphabetical order, so it comes before DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS043T1LE01 > config DRM_PANEL_SITRONIX_ST7701 > tristate "Sitronix ST7701 panel driver" > depends on OF > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile > index e81ed1535024..12dcd76eb87c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_S6E63M0) += panel-samsung-s6e63m0.o > obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_S6E8AA0) += panel-samsung-s6e8aa0.o > obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SEIKO_43WVF1G) += panel-seiko-43wvf1g.o > obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LQ101R1SX01) += panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01) += panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.o > obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS043T1LE01) += panel-sharp-ls043t1le01.o And here it is right. > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c > @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Sharp LS037V7DW01 LCD Panel Driver > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Texas Instruments Incorporated > + * > + * Based on the omapdrm-specific panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01 driver > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2013 Texas Instruments Incorporated > + * Author: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> Add your copyright? > +struct ls037v7dw01_device { > + struct drm_panel panel; > + struct platform_device *pdev; > + > + struct regulator *vcc; The property is named envdd - should they use the same name? > + struct gpio_desc *resb_gpio; /* low = reset active min 20 us */ > + struct gpio_desc *ini_gpio; /* high = power on */ > + struct gpio_desc *mo_gpio; /* low = 480x640, high = 240x320 */ > + struct gpio_desc *lr_gpio; /* high = conventional horizontal scanning */ > + struct gpio_desc *ud_gpio; /* high = conventional vertical scanning */ > +}; device versus panel, but bikeshedding, so feel free to ignore. > + > +static int ls037v7dw01_disable(struct drm_panel *panel) > +{ > + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = to_ls037v7dw01_device(panel); > + > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lcd->ini_gpio, 0); > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lcd->resb_gpio, 0); > + > + /* Wait at least 5 vsyncs after disabling the LCD. */ > + msleep(100); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int ls037v7dw01_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel) > +{ > + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = to_ls037v7dw01_device(panel); > + > + if (lcd->vcc) > + regulator_disable(lcd->vcc); Why is the if (lcd-vcc) needed? If I read the probe code correct then we either get a regulator or we error out. Same goes for all other checks of lcd->vcc > +static const struct drm_display_mode ls037v7dw01_mode = { > + .clock = 19200, > + .hdisplay = 480, > + .hsync_start = 480 + 1, > + .hsync_end = 480 + 1 + 2, > + .htotal = 480 + 1 + 2 + 28, > + .vdisplay = 640, > + .vsync_start = 640 + 1, > + .vsync_end = 640 + 1 + 1, > + .vtotal = 640 + 1 + 1 + 1, > + .vrefresh = 58, > + .type = DRM_MODE_TYPE_DRIVER | DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED, > + .flags = DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC | DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC, > +}; > + > +static int ls037v7dw01_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel) > +{ > + struct drm_connector *connector = panel->connector; > + struct drm_display_mode *mode; > + > + mode = drm_mode_duplicate(panel->drm, &ls037v7dw01_mode); > + if (!mode) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + drm_mode_set_name(mode); > + drm_mode_probed_add(connector, mode); > + > + connector->display_info.width_mm = 56; > + connector->display_info.height_mm = 75; > + /* > + * FIXME: According to the datasheet pixel data is sampled on the > + * rising edge of the clock, but the code running on the SDP3430 > + * indicates sampling on the negative edge. This should be tested on a > + * real device. > + */ > + connector->display_info.bus_flags = DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_HIGH > + | DRM_BUS_FLAG_SYNC_SAMPLE_POSEDGE > + | DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_SAMPLE_NEGEDGE; > + > + return 1; > +} > + > +static const struct drm_panel_funcs ls037v7dw01_funcs = { > + .disable = ls037v7dw01_disable, > + .unprepare = ls037v7dw01_unprepare, > + .prepare = ls037v7dw01_prepare, > + .enable = ls037v7dw01_enable, > + .get_modes = ls037v7dw01_get_modes, > +}; > + > +static int ls037v7dw01_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd; > + > + lcd = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*lcd), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (lcd == NULL) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lcd); > + lcd->pdev = pdev; > + > + lcd->vcc = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "envdd"); > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->vcc)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get regulator\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->vcc); > + } > + > + lcd->ini_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "enable", 0, > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->ini_gpio)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get enable gpio\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->ini_gpio); > + } I fail to see why the _index() variant is used here. But then I did not check the binding, so it may originate from that. Same goes for ireset gpio > + > + lcd->resb_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "reset", 0, > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->resb_gpio)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get reset gpio\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->resb_gpio); > + } > + > + lcd->mo_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "mode", 0, > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->mo_gpio)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mode[0] gpio\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->mo_gpio); > + } > + > + lcd->lr_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "mode", 1, > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->lr_gpio)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mode[1] gpio\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->lr_gpio); > + } > + > + lcd->ud_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "mode", 2, > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->ud_gpio)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mode[2] gpio\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->ud_gpio); > + } Do we set mo, lr ,ud gpio when we call devm_gpiod_get, or are they unused? > + > + drm_panel_init(&lcd->panel); > + lcd->panel.dev = &pdev->dev; > + lcd->panel.funcs = &ls037v7dw01_funcs; > + > + return drm_panel_add(&lcd->panel); > +} > + > +static int ls037v7dw01_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + drm_panel_remove(&lcd->panel); > + ls037v7dw01_disable(&lcd->panel); > + ls037v7dw01_unprepare(&lcd->panel); Use drm_panel_disable(), drm_panel_unprepare() > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id ls037v7dw01_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "sharp,ls037v7dw01", }, > + {}, { /* sentinel */ }, > +}; > + > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ls037v7dw01_of_match); > + > +static struct platform_driver ls037v7dw01_driver = { > + .probe = ls037v7dw01_probe, > + .remove = __exit_p(ls037v7dw01_remove), > + .driver = { > + .name = "panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01", > + .of_match_table = ls037v7dw01_of_match, > + }, > +}; > + > +module_platform_driver(ls037v7dw01_driver); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Sharp LS037V7DW01 Panel Driver"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); "GPL v2"? Sam
Hi Laurent. > > + > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ls037v7dw01_of_match); > > + > > +static struct platform_driver ls037v7dw01_driver = { > > + .probe = ls037v7dw01_probe, > > + .remove = __exit_p(ls037v7dw01_remove), I hope _exit_p() is not needed. No other panel drivers use it as far as I could see. Sam
Hi Sam, On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 09:44:52PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Laurent. > > Third panel driver in line for review. > Review comments that are duplicates from the first two will have only a > brief remark - if any. I'll address them the same way. Please consider all unanswered comments below as addressed. > On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 09:18:58PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > This panel is used on the SDP3430. > > Add a little more context and put it in Kconfig help. > Maybe this is the TI board, and maybe it is something else. > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 7 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile | 1 + > > .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c | 231 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 239 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig > > index da613c04b835..04fd152efe4c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig > > @@ -271,6 +271,13 @@ config DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS043T1LE01 > > Say Y here if you want to enable support for Sharp LS043T1LE01 qHD > > (540x960) DSI panel as found on the Qualcomm APQ8074 Dragonboard > > > > +config DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01 > > + tristate "Sharp LS037V7DW01 VGA LCD panel" > > + depends on GPIOLIB && OF && REGULATOR > > + help > > + Say Y here if you want to enable support for Sharp LS037V7DW01 VGA > > + (480x640) LCD panel. > > + > > Alphabetical order, so it comes before DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS043T1LE01 > > > config DRM_PANEL_SITRONIX_ST7701 > > tristate "Sitronix ST7701 panel driver" > > depends on OF > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile > > index e81ed1535024..12dcd76eb87c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_S6E63M0) += panel-samsung-s6e63m0.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_S6E8AA0) += panel-samsung-s6e8aa0.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SEIKO_43WVF1G) += panel-seiko-43wvf1g.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LQ101R1SX01) += panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01) += panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS043T1LE01) += panel-sharp-ls043t1le01.o > > And here it is right. > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Sharp LS037V7DW01 LCD Panel Driver > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Texas Instruments Incorporated > > + * > > + * Based on the omapdrm-specific panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01 driver > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2013 Texas Instruments Incorporated > > + * Author: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> > > Add your copyright? As with the previous patches, the copyright goes to TI. > > +struct ls037v7dw01_device { > > + struct drm_panel panel; > > + struct platform_device *pdev; > > + > > + struct regulator *vcc; > > The property is named envdd - should they use the same name? I'll rename that to vdd. > > + struct gpio_desc *resb_gpio; /* low = reset active min 20 us */ > > + struct gpio_desc *ini_gpio; /* high = power on */ > > + struct gpio_desc *mo_gpio; /* low = 480x640, high = 240x320 */ > > + struct gpio_desc *lr_gpio; /* high = conventional horizontal scanning */ > > + struct gpio_desc *ud_gpio; /* high = conventional vertical scanning */ > > +}; > > device versus panel, but bikeshedding, so feel free to ignore. I'll rename it. > > + > > +static int ls037v7dw01_disable(struct drm_panel *panel) > > +{ > > + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = to_ls037v7dw01_device(panel); > > + > > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lcd->ini_gpio, 0); > > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lcd->resb_gpio, 0); > > + > > + /* Wait at least 5 vsyncs after disabling the LCD. */ > > + msleep(100); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int ls037v7dw01_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel) > > +{ > > + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = to_ls037v7dw01_device(panel); > > + > > + if (lcd->vcc) > > + regulator_disable(lcd->vcc); > > Why is the if (lcd-vcc) needed? > If I read the probe code correct then we either get a regulator or we > error out. > > Same goes for all other checks of lcd->vcc > > > +static const struct drm_display_mode ls037v7dw01_mode = { > > + .clock = 19200, > > + .hdisplay = 480, > > + .hsync_start = 480 + 1, > > + .hsync_end = 480 + 1 + 2, > > + .htotal = 480 + 1 + 2 + 28, > > + .vdisplay = 640, > > + .vsync_start = 640 + 1, > > + .vsync_end = 640 + 1 + 1, > > + .vtotal = 640 + 1 + 1 + 1, > > + .vrefresh = 58, > > + .type = DRM_MODE_TYPE_DRIVER | DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED, > > + .flags = DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC | DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC, > > +}; > > + > > +static int ls037v7dw01_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel) > > +{ > > + struct drm_connector *connector = panel->connector; > > + struct drm_display_mode *mode; > > + > > + mode = drm_mode_duplicate(panel->drm, &ls037v7dw01_mode); > > + if (!mode) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + drm_mode_set_name(mode); > > + drm_mode_probed_add(connector, mode); > > + > > + connector->display_info.width_mm = 56; > > + connector->display_info.height_mm = 75; > > + /* > > + * FIXME: According to the datasheet pixel data is sampled on the > > + * rising edge of the clock, but the code running on the SDP3430 > > + * indicates sampling on the negative edge. This should be tested on a > > + * real device. > > + */ > > + connector->display_info.bus_flags = DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_HIGH > > + | DRM_BUS_FLAG_SYNC_SAMPLE_POSEDGE > > + | DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_SAMPLE_NEGEDGE; > > + > > + return 1; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct drm_panel_funcs ls037v7dw01_funcs = { > > + .disable = ls037v7dw01_disable, > > + .unprepare = ls037v7dw01_unprepare, > > + .prepare = ls037v7dw01_prepare, > > + .enable = ls037v7dw01_enable, > > + .get_modes = ls037v7dw01_get_modes, > > +}; > > + > > +static int ls037v7dw01_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd; > > + > > + lcd = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*lcd), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (lcd == NULL) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lcd); > > + lcd->pdev = pdev; > > + > > + lcd->vcc = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "envdd"); > > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->vcc)) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get regulator\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->vcc); > > + } > > + > > + lcd->ini_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "enable", 0, > > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->ini_gpio)) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get enable gpio\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->ini_gpio); > > + } > > I fail to see why the _index() variant is used here. > But then I did not check the binding, so it may originate from that. > Same goes for ireset gpio > > > + > > + lcd->resb_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "reset", 0, > > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->resb_gpio)) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get reset gpio\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->resb_gpio); > > + } > > + > > + lcd->mo_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "mode", 0, > > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->mo_gpio)) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mode[0] gpio\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->mo_gpio); > > + } > > + > > + lcd->lr_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "mode", 1, > > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->lr_gpio)) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mode[1] gpio\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->lr_gpio); > > + } > > + > > + lcd->ud_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "mode", 2, > > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > + if (IS_ERR(lcd->ud_gpio)) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mode[2] gpio\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(lcd->ud_gpio); > > + } > > Do we set mo, lr ,ud gpio when we call devm_gpiod_get, or are they > unused? They are set by GPIOD_OUT_LOW. > > + > > + drm_panel_init(&lcd->panel); > > + lcd->panel.dev = &pdev->dev; > > + lcd->panel.funcs = &ls037v7dw01_funcs; > > + > > + return drm_panel_add(&lcd->panel); > > +} > > + > > +static int ls037v7dw01_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > + > > + drm_panel_remove(&lcd->panel); > > + ls037v7dw01_disable(&lcd->panel); > > + ls037v7dw01_unprepare(&lcd->panel); > > Use drm_panel_disable(), drm_panel_unprepare() > > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct of_device_id ls037v7dw01_of_match[] = { > > + { .compatible = "sharp,ls037v7dw01", }, > > + {}, > > { /* sentinel */ }, > > > +}; > > + > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ls037v7dw01_of_match); > > + > > +static struct platform_driver ls037v7dw01_driver = { > > + .probe = ls037v7dw01_probe, > > + .remove = __exit_p(ls037v7dw01_remove), > > + .driver = { > > + .name = "panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01", > > + .of_match_table = ls037v7dw01_of_match, > > + }, > > +}; > > + > > +module_platform_driver(ls037v7dw01_driver); > > + > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>"); > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Sharp LS037V7DW01 Panel Driver"); > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > > "GPL v2"?
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig index da613c04b835..04fd152efe4c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig @@ -271,6 +271,13 @@ config DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS043T1LE01 Say Y here if you want to enable support for Sharp LS043T1LE01 qHD (540x960) DSI panel as found on the Qualcomm APQ8074 Dragonboard +config DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01 + tristate "Sharp LS037V7DW01 VGA LCD panel" + depends on GPIOLIB && OF && REGULATOR + help + Say Y here if you want to enable support for Sharp LS037V7DW01 VGA + (480x640) LCD panel. + config DRM_PANEL_SITRONIX_ST7701 tristate "Sitronix ST7701 panel driver" depends on OF diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile index e81ed1535024..12dcd76eb87c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_S6E63M0) += panel-samsung-s6e63m0.o obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_S6E8AA0) += panel-samsung-s6e8aa0.o obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SEIKO_43WVF1G) += panel-seiko-43wvf1g.o obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LQ101R1SX01) += panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.o +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01) += panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.o obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LS043T1LE01) += panel-sharp-ls043t1le01.o obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SITRONIX_ST7701) += panel-sitronix-st7701.o obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SITRONIX_ST7789V) += panel-sitronix-st7789v.o diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4532455b4161 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Sharp LS037V7DW01 LCD Panel Driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2019 Texas Instruments Incorporated + * + * Based on the omapdrm-specific panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01 driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2013 Texas Instruments Incorporated + * Author: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> + */ + +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> + +#include <drm/drm_connector.h> +#include <drm/drm_modes.h> +#include <drm/drm_panel.h> + +struct ls037v7dw01_device { + struct drm_panel panel; + struct platform_device *pdev; + + struct regulator *vcc; + struct gpio_desc *resb_gpio; /* low = reset active min 20 us */ + struct gpio_desc *ini_gpio; /* high = power on */ + struct gpio_desc *mo_gpio; /* low = 480x640, high = 240x320 */ + struct gpio_desc *lr_gpio; /* high = conventional horizontal scanning */ + struct gpio_desc *ud_gpio; /* high = conventional vertical scanning */ +}; + +#define to_ls037v7dw01_device(p) \ + container_of(p, struct ls037v7dw01_device, panel) + +static int ls037v7dw01_disable(struct drm_panel *panel) +{ + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = to_ls037v7dw01_device(panel); + + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lcd->ini_gpio, 0); + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lcd->resb_gpio, 0); + + /* Wait at least 5 vsyncs after disabling the LCD. */ + msleep(100); + + return 0; +} + +static int ls037v7dw01_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel) +{ + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = to_ls037v7dw01_device(panel); + + if (lcd->vcc) + regulator_disable(lcd->vcc); + + return 0; +} + +static int ls037v7dw01_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel) +{ + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = to_ls037v7dw01_device(panel); + int ret; + + if (!lcd->vcc) + return 0; + + ret = regulator_enable(lcd->vcc); + if (ret < 0) + dev_err(&lcd->pdev->dev, "%s: failed to enable regulator\n", + __func__); + + return ret; +} + +static int ls037v7dw01_enable(struct drm_panel *panel) +{ + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = to_ls037v7dw01_device(panel); + + /* Wait couple of vsyncs before enabling the LCD. */ + msleep(50); + + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lcd->resb_gpio, 1); + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lcd->ini_gpio, 1); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct drm_display_mode ls037v7dw01_mode = { + .clock = 19200, + .hdisplay = 480, + .hsync_start = 480 + 1, + .hsync_end = 480 + 1 + 2, + .htotal = 480 + 1 + 2 + 28, + .vdisplay = 640, + .vsync_start = 640 + 1, + .vsync_end = 640 + 1 + 1, + .vtotal = 640 + 1 + 1 + 1, + .vrefresh = 58, + .type = DRM_MODE_TYPE_DRIVER | DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED, + .flags = DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC | DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC, +}; + +static int ls037v7dw01_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel) +{ + struct drm_connector *connector = panel->connector; + struct drm_display_mode *mode; + + mode = drm_mode_duplicate(panel->drm, &ls037v7dw01_mode); + if (!mode) + return -ENOMEM; + + drm_mode_set_name(mode); + drm_mode_probed_add(connector, mode); + + connector->display_info.width_mm = 56; + connector->display_info.height_mm = 75; + /* + * FIXME: According to the datasheet pixel data is sampled on the + * rising edge of the clock, but the code running on the SDP3430 + * indicates sampling on the negative edge. This should be tested on a + * real device. + */ + connector->display_info.bus_flags = DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_HIGH + | DRM_BUS_FLAG_SYNC_SAMPLE_POSEDGE + | DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_SAMPLE_NEGEDGE; + + return 1; +} + +static const struct drm_panel_funcs ls037v7dw01_funcs = { + .disable = ls037v7dw01_disable, + .unprepare = ls037v7dw01_unprepare, + .prepare = ls037v7dw01_prepare, + .enable = ls037v7dw01_enable, + .get_modes = ls037v7dw01_get_modes, +}; + +static int ls037v7dw01_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd; + + lcd = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*lcd), GFP_KERNEL); + if (lcd == NULL) + return -ENOMEM; + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lcd); + lcd->pdev = pdev; + + lcd->vcc = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "envdd"); + if (IS_ERR(lcd->vcc)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get regulator\n"); + return PTR_ERR(lcd->vcc); + } + + lcd->ini_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "enable", 0, + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + if (IS_ERR(lcd->ini_gpio)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get enable gpio\n"); + return PTR_ERR(lcd->ini_gpio); + } + + lcd->resb_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "reset", 0, + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + if (IS_ERR(lcd->resb_gpio)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get reset gpio\n"); + return PTR_ERR(lcd->resb_gpio); + } + + lcd->mo_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "mode", 0, + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + if (IS_ERR(lcd->mo_gpio)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mode[0] gpio\n"); + return PTR_ERR(lcd->mo_gpio); + } + + lcd->lr_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "mode", 1, + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + if (IS_ERR(lcd->lr_gpio)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mode[1] gpio\n"); + return PTR_ERR(lcd->lr_gpio); + } + + lcd->ud_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "mode", 2, + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + if (IS_ERR(lcd->ud_gpio)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mode[2] gpio\n"); + return PTR_ERR(lcd->ud_gpio); + } + + drm_panel_init(&lcd->panel); + lcd->panel.dev = &pdev->dev; + lcd->panel.funcs = &ls037v7dw01_funcs; + + return drm_panel_add(&lcd->panel); +} + +static int ls037v7dw01_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct ls037v7dw01_device *lcd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + drm_panel_remove(&lcd->panel); + ls037v7dw01_disable(&lcd->panel); + ls037v7dw01_unprepare(&lcd->panel); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id ls037v7dw01_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "sharp,ls037v7dw01", }, + {}, +}; + +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ls037v7dw01_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver ls037v7dw01_driver = { + .probe = ls037v7dw01_probe, + .remove = __exit_p(ls037v7dw01_remove), + .driver = { + .name = "panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01", + .of_match_table = ls037v7dw01_of_match, + }, +}; + +module_platform_driver(ls037v7dw01_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Sharp LS037V7DW01 Panel Driver"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
This panel is used on the SDP3430. Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile | 1 + .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c | 231 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 239 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c