Message ID | 20191104221228.3588-4-andrzej.p@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | AFBC support for Rockchip | expand |
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > There are afbc helpers available. > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com> > --- > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 - > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------ > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ > > #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8 > #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16 > -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128 > #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256 > #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024 > #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096 > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> > * > */ > +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h> > #include <drm/drm_device.h> > #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h> > #include <drm/drm_gem.h> > @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base; > const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format; > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp; > - u64 min_size; > + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp; > > obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]); > if (!obj) { > @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > return -ENOENT; > } > > - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) { > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8: > - alignment_w = 32; > - alignment_h = 8; > - break; > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16: > - alignment_w = 16; > - alignment_h = 16; > - break; > - default: > - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n", > - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK); > - break; > + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) && > + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) { > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n", > + alignment_w, alignment_h); > + > + return -EINVAL; To be honest, the previous code looks much more readable > } > > /* tiled header afbc */ > @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > goto check_failed; > } > > - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS; > - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE, > - alignment_header); > - > bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier); > - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks * > - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8, > - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT); > - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0]; > - if (min_size > obj->size) { > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n", > - obj->size, min_size); We need kfb->offset_payload and kfb->afbc_size to set some registers in d71_layer_update(). At this moment I feel like punching myself for making the suggestion to consider abstracting some of the komeda's afbc checks. To me it does not look like komeda(in the current shape) can take much advantage of the generic _afbc_fb_check() function (as was suggested previously by Danvet). However, I will let james.qian.wang@arm.com, Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com, Ben.Davis@arm.com comment here to see if there could be a way of abstracting the afbc bits from komeda. Thanks anyways for taking a stab at this. -Ayan > + > + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp, > + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, > + alignment_w, alignment_h, > + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0], > + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT)) > goto check_failed; > - } > > fb->obj[0] = obj; > return 0; > -- > 2.17.1
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:09:54PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > There are afbc helpers available. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com> > > --- > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 - > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------ > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ > > > > #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8 > > #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16 > > -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128 > > #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256 > > #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024 > > #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096 > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > > * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> > > * > > */ > > +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h> > > #include <drm/drm_device.h> > > #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h> > > #include <drm/drm_gem.h> > > @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base; > > const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format; > > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > > - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp; > > - u64 min_size; > > + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp; > > > > obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]); > > if (!obj) { > > @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > return -ENOENT; > > } > > > > - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) { > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8: > > - alignment_w = 32; > > - alignment_h = 8; > > - break; > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16: > > - alignment_w = 16; > > - alignment_h = 16; > > - break; > > - default: > > - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n", > > - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK); > > - break; > > + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) && > > + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) { > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n", > > + alignment_w, alignment_h); > > + > > + return -EINVAL; > To be honest, the previous code looks much more readable > > } > > > > /* tiled header afbc */ > > @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > goto check_failed; > > } > > > > - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS; > > - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE, > > - alignment_header); > > - > > bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier); > > - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks * > > - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8, > > - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT); > > - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0]; > > - if (min_size > obj->size) { > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n", > > - obj->size, min_size); > We need kfb->offset_payload and kfb->afbc_size to set some registers > in d71_layer_update(). At this moment I feel like punching myself for > making the suggestion to consider abstracting some of the komeda's afbc > checks. To me it does not look like komeda(in the current shape) can take > much advantage of the generic _afbc_fb_check() function (as was suggested > previously by Danvet). > > However, I will let james.qian.wang@arm.com, > Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com, Ben.Davis@arm.com comment here to see if > there could be a way of abstracting the afbc bits from komeda. > Hi all: Since the current generic drm_afbc helpers only support afbc_1.1, but komeda needs support both afbc1.1/1.2, so I think we can: - Add afbc1.2 support to drm afbc helpers. - for the afbc_payload_offset, can we add this member to drm_framebuffer ? - The aligned_w/h are important for afbc, so can we have them in drm_framebuffer ? Thanks James > Thanks anyways for taking a stab at this. > -Ayan > > + > > + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp, > > + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, > > + alignment_w, alignment_h, > > + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0], > > + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT)) > > goto check_failed; > > - } > > > > fb->obj[0] = obj; > > return 0; > > -- > > 2.17.1
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:01:53AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:09:54PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > > There are afbc helpers available. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com> > > > --- > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 - > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------ > > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ > > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8 > > > #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16 > > > -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128 > > > #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256 > > > #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024 > > > #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096 > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > > > * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> > > > * > > > */ > > > +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h> > > > #include <drm/drm_device.h> > > > #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h> > > > #include <drm/drm_gem.h> > > > @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base; > > > const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format; > > > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > > > - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp; > > > - u64 min_size; > > > + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp; > > > > > > obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]); > > > if (!obj) { > > > @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > return -ENOENT; > > > } > > > > > > - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) { > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8: > > > - alignment_w = 32; > > > - alignment_h = 8; > > > - break; > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16: > > > - alignment_w = 16; > > > - alignment_h = 16; > > > - break; > > > - default: > > > - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n", > > > - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK); > > > - break; > > > + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h)) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) && > > > + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) { > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n", > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h); > > > + > > > + return -EINVAL; > > To be honest, the previous code looks much more readable > > > } > > > > > > /* tiled header afbc */ > > > @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > goto check_failed; > > > } > > > > > > - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS; > > > - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE, > > > - alignment_header); > > > - > > > bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier); > > > - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks * > > > - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8, > > > - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT); > > > - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0]; > > > - if (min_size > obj->size) { > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n", > > > - obj->size, min_size); > > We need kfb->offset_payload and kfb->afbc_size to set some registers > > in d71_layer_update(). At this moment I feel like punching myself for > > making the suggestion to consider abstracting some of the komeda's afbc > > checks. To me it does not look like komeda(in the current shape) can take > > much advantage of the generic _afbc_fb_check() function (as was suggested > > previously by Danvet). > > > > However, I will let james.qian.wang@arm.com, > > Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com, Ben.Davis@arm.com comment here to see if > > there could be a way of abstracting the afbc bits from komeda. > > > > Hi all: > > Since the current generic drm_afbc helpers only support afbc_1.1, but > komeda needs support both afbc1.1/1.2, so I think we can: > - Add afbc1.2 support to drm afbc helpers. > - for the afbc_payload_offset, can we add this member to > drm_framebuffer ? > - The aligned_w/h are important for afbc, so can we have them in > drm_framebuffer ? How expensive is it to recompute these from a struct drm_framebuffer? I'd just go with one function which computes all these derived values, and stuffs them into a struct drm_afbc. Then drivers call that once or so. For reworking drm_framebuffer itself I think it's probably a bit too earlier. And if we do it, we should maybe go a bit more bold, aiming to property-fy all the framebuffer settings, maybe even making it extensible, and have drivers handle a corresponding drm_framebuffer_state. A third option would be to create a drm_afbc_framebuffer which embeds drm_framebuffer and which drivers would need to use. But also feels a bit like too much churn. Recomputing should be quick enough and much easier. -Daniel > > Thanks > James > > > Thanks anyways for taking a stab at this. > > -Ayan > > > + > > > + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp, > > > + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h, > > > + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0], > > > + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT)) > > > goto check_failed; > > > - } > > > > > > fb->obj[0] = obj; > > > return 0; > > > -- > > > 2.17.1
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:39:54PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:01:53AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:09:54PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > > > There are afbc helpers available. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com> > > > > --- > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 - > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------ > > > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ > > > > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8 > > > > #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16 > > > > -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128 > > > > #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256 > > > > #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024 > > > > #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096 > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > > > > * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> > > > > * > > > > */ > > > > +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_device.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_gem.h> > > > > @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base; > > > > const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format; > > > > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > > > > - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp; > > > > - u64 min_size; > > > > + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp; > > > > > > > > obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]); > > > > if (!obj) { > > > > @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > return -ENOENT; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) { > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8: > > > > - alignment_w = 32; > > > > - alignment_h = 8; > > > > - break; > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16: > > > > - alignment_w = 16; > > > > - alignment_h = 16; > > > > - break; > > > > - default: > > > > - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n", > > > > - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK); > > > > - break; > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h)) > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > + > > > > + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) && > > > > + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) { > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n", > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h); > > > > + > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > To be honest, the previous code looks much more readable > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* tiled header afbc */ > > > > @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS; > > > > - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE, > > > > - alignment_header); > > > > - > > > > bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier); > > > > - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks * > > > > - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8, > > > > - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT); > > > > - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0]; > > > > - if (min_size > obj->size) { > > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n", > > > > - obj->size, min_size); > > > We need kfb->offset_payload and kfb->afbc_size to set some registers > > > in d71_layer_update(). At this moment I feel like punching myself for > > > making the suggestion to consider abstracting some of the komeda's afbc > > > checks. To me it does not look like komeda(in the current shape) can take > > > much advantage of the generic _afbc_fb_check() function (as was suggested > > > previously by Danvet). > > > > > > However, I will let james.qian.wang@arm.com, > > > Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com, Ben.Davis@arm.com comment here to see if > > > there could be a way of abstracting the afbc bits from komeda. > > > > > > > Hi all: > > > > Since the current generic drm_afbc helpers only support afbc_1.1, but > > komeda needs support both afbc1.1/1.2, so I think we can: > > - Add afbc1.2 support to drm afbc helpers. > > - for the afbc_payload_offset, can we add this member to > > drm_framebuffer ? > > - The aligned_w/h are important for afbc, so can we have them in > > drm_framebuffer ? > > How expensive is it to recompute these from a struct drm_framebuffer? > > I'd just go with one function which computes all these derived values, and > stuffs them into a struct drm_afbc. Then drivers call that once or so. > A struct drm_afbc, good idea, I like it. :-) and we can compute it when do the afbc size check like drm_afbc_check_fb_size(..., &komeda_fb->drm_afbc); Thanks. James > For reworking drm_framebuffer itself I think it's probably a bit too > earlier. And if we do it, we should maybe go a bit more bold, aiming to > property-fy all the framebuffer settings, maybe even making it extensible, > and have drivers handle a corresponding drm_framebuffer_state. > > A third option would be to create a drm_afbc_framebuffer which embeds > drm_framebuffer and which drivers would need to use. But also feels a bit > like too much churn. Recomputing should be quick enough and much easier. > -Daniel > > > > > Thanks > > James > > > > > Thanks anyways for taking a stab at this. > > > -Ayan > > > > + > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp, > > > > + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h, > > > > + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0], > > > > + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT)) > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > - } > > > > > > > > fb->obj[0] = obj; > > > > return 0; > > > > -- > > > > 2.17.1 > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:52 AM james qian wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang@arm.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:39:54PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:01:53AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:09:54PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > > > > There are afbc helpers available. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 - > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------ > > > > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ > > > > > > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8 > > > > > #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16 > > > > > -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128 > > > > > #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256 > > > > > #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024 > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096 > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > > > > > * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> > > > > > * > > > > > */ > > > > > +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h> > > > > > #include <drm/drm_device.h> > > > > > #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h> > > > > > #include <drm/drm_gem.h> > > > > > @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base; > > > > > const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format; > > > > > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > > > > > - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp; > > > > > - u64 min_size; > > > > > + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp; > > > > > > > > > > obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]); > > > > > if (!obj) { > > > > > @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > return -ENOENT; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) { > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8: > > > > > - alignment_w = 32; > > > > > - alignment_h = 8; > > > > > - break; > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16: > > > > > - alignment_w = 16; > > > > > - alignment_h = 16; > > > > > - break; > > > > > - default: > > > > > - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n", > > > > > - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK); > > > > > - break; > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h)) > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > + > > > > > + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) && > > > > > + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) { > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n", > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h); > > > > > + > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > To be honest, the previous code looks much more readable > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > /* tiled header afbc */ > > > > > @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS; > > > > > - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE, > > > > > - alignment_header); > > > > > - > > > > > bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier); > > > > > - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks * > > > > > - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8, > > > > > - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT); > > > > > - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0]; > > > > > - if (min_size > obj->size) { > > > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n", > > > > > - obj->size, min_size); > > > > We need kfb->offset_payload and kfb->afbc_size to set some registers > > > > in d71_layer_update(). At this moment I feel like punching myself for > > > > making the suggestion to consider abstracting some of the komeda's afbc > > > > checks. To me it does not look like komeda(in the current shape) can take > > > > much advantage of the generic _afbc_fb_check() function (as was suggested > > > > previously by Danvet). > > > > > > > > However, I will let james.qian.wang@arm.com, > > > > Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com, Ben.Davis@arm.com comment here to see if > > > > there could be a way of abstracting the afbc bits from komeda. > > > > > > > > > > Hi all: > > > > > > Since the current generic drm_afbc helpers only support afbc_1.1, but > > > komeda needs support both afbc1.1/1.2, so I think we can: > > > - Add afbc1.2 support to drm afbc helpers. > > > - for the afbc_payload_offset, can we add this member to > > > drm_framebuffer ? > > > - The aligned_w/h are important for afbc, so can we have them in > > > drm_framebuffer ? > > > > How expensive is it to recompute these from a struct drm_framebuffer? > > > > I'd just go with one function which computes all these derived values, and > > stuffs them into a struct drm_afbc. Then drivers call that once or so. > > > > A struct drm_afbc, good idea, I like it. :-) > > and we can compute it when do the afbc size check like > > drm_afbc_check_fb_size(..., &komeda_fb->drm_afbc); Discussed this also with Andrzej on irc on where exactly to place stuff. I think ideally we'd be able to get rid of the custom malidp_fb_create completely, and komeda should also be able to get rid of most of the open-coded checks (it's largely reinveting drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs, imo better to just call that first, then then do a few more calls of the specific things you need to have computed in addition). -Daniel > > Thanks. > James > > > For reworking drm_framebuffer itself I think it's probably a bit too > > earlier. And if we do it, we should maybe go a bit more bold, aiming to > > property-fy all the framebuffer settings, maybe even making it extensible, > > and have drivers handle a corresponding drm_framebuffer_state. > > > > A third option would be to create a drm_afbc_framebuffer which embeds > > drm_framebuffer and which drivers would need to use. But also feels a bit > > like too much churn. Recomputing should be quick enough and much easier. > > -Daniel > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > James > > > > > > > Thanks anyways for taking a stab at this. > > > > -Ayan > > > > > + > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp, > > > > > + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h, > > > > > + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0], > > > > > + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT)) > > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > > - } > > > > > > > > > > fb->obj[0] = obj; > > > > > return 0; > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.17.1 > > > > -- > > Daniel Vetter > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:12:13AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:52 AM james qian wang (Arm Technology China) > <james.qian.wang@arm.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:39:54PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:01:53AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:09:54PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > > > > > There are afbc helpers available. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 - > > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------ > > > > > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > > index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ > > > > > > > > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8 > > > > > > #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16 > > > > > > -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128 > > > > > > #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256 > > > > > > #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024 > > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096 > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > > index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > > > > > > * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> > > > > > > * > > > > > > */ > > > > > > +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h> > > > > > > #include <drm/drm_device.h> > > > > > > #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h> > > > > > > #include <drm/drm_gem.h> > > > > > > @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base; > > > > > > const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format; > > > > > > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > > > > > > - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp; > > > > > > - u64 min_size; > > > > > > + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp; > > > > > > > > > > > > obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]); > > > > > > if (!obj) { > > > > > > @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > > return -ENOENT; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) { > > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8: > > > > > > - alignment_w = 32; > > > > > > - alignment_h = 8; > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16: > > > > > > - alignment_w = 16; > > > > > > - alignment_h = 16; > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > - default: > > > > > > - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n", > > > > > > - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK); > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h)) > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) && > > > > > > + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) { > > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n", > > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > To be honest, the previous code looks much more readable > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > /* tiled header afbc */ > > > > > > @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS; > > > > > > - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE, > > > > > > - alignment_header); > > > > > > - > > > > > > bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier); > > > > > > - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks * > > > > > > - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8, > > > > > > - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT); > > > > > > - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0]; > > > > > > - if (min_size > obj->size) { > > > > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n", > > > > > > - obj->size, min_size); > > > > > We need kfb->offset_payload and kfb->afbc_size to set some registers > > > > > in d71_layer_update(). At this moment I feel like punching myself for > > > > > making the suggestion to consider abstracting some of the komeda's afbc > > > > > checks. To me it does not look like komeda(in the current shape) can take > > > > > much advantage of the generic _afbc_fb_check() function (as was suggested > > > > > previously by Danvet). > > > > > > > > > > However, I will let james.qian.wang@arm.com, > > > > > Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com, Ben.Davis@arm.com comment here to see if > > > > > there could be a way of abstracting the afbc bits from komeda. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all: > > > > > > > > Since the current generic drm_afbc helpers only support afbc_1.1, but > > > > komeda needs support both afbc1.1/1.2, so I think we can: > > > > - Add afbc1.2 support to drm afbc helpers. > > > > - for the afbc_payload_offset, can we add this member to > > > > drm_framebuffer ? > > > > - The aligned_w/h are important for afbc, so can we have them in > > > > drm_framebuffer ? > > > > > > How expensive is it to recompute these from a struct drm_framebuffer? > > > > > > I'd just go with one function which computes all these derived values, and > > > stuffs them into a struct drm_afbc. Then drivers call that once or so. > > > > > > > A struct drm_afbc, good idea, I like it. :-) > > > > and we can compute it when do the afbc size check like > > > > drm_afbc_check_fb_size(..., &komeda_fb->drm_afbc); > > Discussed this also with Andrzej on irc on where exactly to place > stuff. I think ideally we'd be able to get rid of the custom > malidp_fb_create completely, and komeda should also be able to get rid > of most of the open-coded checks (it's largely reinveting > drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs, imo better to just call that first, then > then do a few more calls of the specific things you need to have > computed in addition). > -Daniel The afbc support is the only reason why malidp/komeda define our own fb_create(), it is good for komeda and malidp if we put afbc support directly into the standard drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs. BTW: can we add one more argument: fb_struct_size to drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs(..., size_t fb_struct_size); then driver can use it to extend its own fb struct and add some private infos. Thanks James > > > > Thanks. > > James > > > > > For reworking drm_framebuffer itself I think it's probably a bit too > > > earlier. And if we do it, we should maybe go a bit more bold, aiming to > > > property-fy all the framebuffer settings, maybe even making it extensible, > > > and have drivers handle a corresponding drm_framebuffer_state. > > > > > > A third option would be to create a drm_afbc_framebuffer which embeds > > > drm_framebuffer and which drivers would need to use. But also feels a bit > > > like too much churn. Recomputing should be quick enough and much easier. > > > -Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > James > > > > > > > > > Thanks anyways for taking a stab at this. > > > > > -Ayan > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp, > > > > > > + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, > > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h, > > > > > > + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0], > > > > > > + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT)) > > > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > > > - } > > > > > > > > > > > > fb->obj[0] = obj; > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Vetter > > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > > > http://blog.ffwll.ch > > > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 07:09:56AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:12:13AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:52 AM james qian wang (Arm Technology China) > > <james.qian.wang@arm.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:39:54PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:01:53AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:09:54PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > > > > > > There are afbc helpers available. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com> > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 - > > > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------ > > > > > > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > > > index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > > > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8 > > > > > > > #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16 > > > > > > > -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128 > > > > > > > #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256 > > > > > > > #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024 > > > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096 > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > > > index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > > > > > > > * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> > > > > > > > * > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h> > > > > > > > #include <drm/drm_device.h> > > > > > > > #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h> > > > > > > > #include <drm/drm_gem.h> > > > > > > > @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base; > > > > > > > const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format; > > > > > > > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > > > > > > > - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp; > > > > > > > - u64 min_size; > > > > > > > + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]); > > > > > > > if (!obj) { > > > > > > > @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > > > return -ENOENT; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) { > > > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8: > > > > > > > - alignment_w = 32; > > > > > > > - alignment_h = 8; > > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16: > > > > > > > - alignment_w = 16; > > > > > > > - alignment_h = 16; > > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > > - default: > > > > > > > - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n", > > > > > > > - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK); > > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h)) > > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) && > > > > > > > + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) { > > > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n", > > > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h); > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > To be honest, the previous code looks much more readable > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* tiled header afbc */ > > > > > > > @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS; > > > > > > > - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE, > > > > > > > - alignment_header); > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier); > > > > > > > - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks * > > > > > > > - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8, > > > > > > > - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT); > > > > > > > - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0]; > > > > > > > - if (min_size > obj->size) { > > > > > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n", > > > > > > > - obj->size, min_size); > > > > > > We need kfb->offset_payload and kfb->afbc_size to set some registers > > > > > > in d71_layer_update(). At this moment I feel like punching myself for > > > > > > making the suggestion to consider abstracting some of the komeda's afbc > > > > > > checks. To me it does not look like komeda(in the current shape) can take > > > > > > much advantage of the generic _afbc_fb_check() function (as was suggested > > > > > > previously by Danvet). > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I will let james.qian.wang@arm.com, > > > > > > Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com, Ben.Davis@arm.com comment here to see if > > > > > > there could be a way of abstracting the afbc bits from komeda. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all: > > > > > > > > > > Since the current generic drm_afbc helpers only support afbc_1.1, but > > > > > komeda needs support both afbc1.1/1.2, so I think we can: > > > > > - Add afbc1.2 support to drm afbc helpers. > > > > > - for the afbc_payload_offset, can we add this member to > > > > > drm_framebuffer ? > > > > > - The aligned_w/h are important for afbc, so can we have them in > > > > > drm_framebuffer ? > > > > > > > > How expensive is it to recompute these from a struct drm_framebuffer? > > > > > > > > I'd just go with one function which computes all these derived values, and > > > > stuffs them into a struct drm_afbc. Then drivers call that once or so. > > > > > > > > > > A struct drm_afbc, good idea, I like it. :-) > > > > > > and we can compute it when do the afbc size check like > > > > > > drm_afbc_check_fb_size(..., &komeda_fb->drm_afbc); > > > > Discussed this also with Andrzej on irc on where exactly to place > > stuff. I think ideally we'd be able to get rid of the custom > > malidp_fb_create completely, and komeda should also be able to get rid > > of most of the open-coded checks (it's largely reinveting > > drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs, imo better to just call that first, then > > then do a few more calls of the specific things you need to have > > computed in addition). > > -Daniel > > The afbc support is the only reason why malidp/komeda define our own > fb_create(), it is good for komeda and malidp if we put afbc support > directly into the standard drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs. > > BTW: > > can we add one more argument: fb_struct_size to > > drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs(..., size_t fb_struct_size); > > then driver can use it to extend its own fb struct and add some private > infos. Hm, this isn't how we usually do it for subclassing - the trouble with this is that the size of the allocation is very far away from where we actually allocate, automated checkers have a harder time with this pattern. Usually what we do is split the kzalloc out from the _create function, leaving just _init behind. Then you have roughly (pseudo-code): drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs(args) { struct drm_gem_fb *fb; fb = kzalloc(sizeof(*fb)); if (!fb) return -ENOMEM; return drm_gem_fb_init_with_functions(fb, args); } If you then need a bigger function, you just allocate that bigger function, and pass &fb->base to the _init function. Costs 3 additional lines (for the kzalloc and error checking), but easier to read&verify for both humans and compilers. I guess what we could then do is create a drm_gem_afbc_create function which sets this all up for a struct drm_gem_afbc_framebuffer { struct drm_gem_framebuffer base; /* afbc stuff */ }; and then also fills out all derived afbc values, so more than just calling drm_gem_fb_init_with_functions. And drivers could still have their own version with even more checks on top. And all afbc supporting drivers could then use that. Feels a bit like overengineering to me, but if you feel like that's justified to do it's a good solution. Cheers, Daniel > > Thanks > James > > > > > > Thanks. > > > James > > > > > > > For reworking drm_framebuffer itself I think it's probably a bit too > > > > earlier. And if we do it, we should maybe go a bit more bold, aiming to > > > > property-fy all the framebuffer settings, maybe even making it extensible, > > > > and have drivers handle a corresponding drm_framebuffer_state. > > > > > > > > A third option would be to create a drm_afbc_framebuffer which embeds > > > > drm_framebuffer and which drivers would need to use. But also feels a bit > > > > like too much churn. Recomputing should be quick enough and much easier. > > > > -Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks anyways for taking a stab at this. > > > > > > -Ayan > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp, > > > > > > > + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, > > > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h, > > > > > > > + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0], > > > > > > > + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT)) > > > > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > > > > - } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fb->obj[0] = obj; > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Daniel Vetter > > > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > > > > http://blog.ffwll.ch > > > > > > > > -- > > Daniel Vetter > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:51:36AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 07:09:56AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:12:13AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:52 AM james qian wang (Arm Technology China) > > > <james.qian.wang@arm.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:39:54PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:01:53AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:09:54PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > > > > > > > There are afbc helpers available. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 - > > > > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------ > > > > > > > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > > > > index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h > > > > > > > > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8 > > > > > > > > #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16 > > > > > > > > -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128 > > > > > > > > #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256 > > > > > > > > #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024 > > > > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096 > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > > > > index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c > > > > > > > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > > > > > > > > * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> > > > > > > > > * > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h> > > > > > > > > #include <drm/drm_device.h> > > > > > > > > #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h> > > > > > > > > #include <drm/drm_gem.h> > > > > > > > > @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > > > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base; > > > > > > > > const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format; > > > > > > > > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > > > > > > > > - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp; > > > > > > > > - u64 min_size; > > > > > > > > + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]); > > > > > > > > if (!obj) { > > > > > > > > @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > > > > return -ENOENT; > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) { > > > > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8: > > > > > > > > - alignment_w = 32; > > > > > > > > - alignment_h = 8; > > > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16: > > > > > > > > - alignment_w = 16; > > > > > > > > - alignment_h = 16; > > > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > > > - default: > > > > > > > > - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n", > > > > > > > > - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK); > > > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h)) > > > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) && > > > > > > > > + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) { > > > > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n", > > > > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > To be honest, the previous code looks much more readable > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* tiled header afbc */ > > > > > > > > @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, > > > > > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS; > > > > > > > > - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE, > > > > > > > > - alignment_header); > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier); > > > > > > > > - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks * > > > > > > > > - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8, > > > > > > > > - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT); > > > > > > > > - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0]; > > > > > > > > - if (min_size > obj->size) { > > > > > > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n", > > > > > > > > - obj->size, min_size); > > > > > > > We need kfb->offset_payload and kfb->afbc_size to set some registers > > > > > > > in d71_layer_update(). At this moment I feel like punching myself for > > > > > > > making the suggestion to consider abstracting some of the komeda's afbc > > > > > > > checks. To me it does not look like komeda(in the current shape) can take > > > > > > > much advantage of the generic _afbc_fb_check() function (as was suggested > > > > > > > previously by Danvet). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I will let james.qian.wang@arm.com, > > > > > > > Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com, Ben.Davis@arm.com comment here to see if > > > > > > > there could be a way of abstracting the afbc bits from komeda. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all: > > > > > > > > > > > > Since the current generic drm_afbc helpers only support afbc_1.1, but > > > > > > komeda needs support both afbc1.1/1.2, so I think we can: > > > > > > - Add afbc1.2 support to drm afbc helpers. > > > > > > - for the afbc_payload_offset, can we add this member to > > > > > > drm_framebuffer ? > > > > > > - The aligned_w/h are important for afbc, so can we have them in > > > > > > drm_framebuffer ? > > > > > > > > > > How expensive is it to recompute these from a struct drm_framebuffer? > > > > > > > > > > I'd just go with one function which computes all these derived values, and > > > > > stuffs them into a struct drm_afbc. Then drivers call that once or so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > A struct drm_afbc, good idea, I like it. :-) > > > > > > > > and we can compute it when do the afbc size check like > > > > > > > > drm_afbc_check_fb_size(..., &komeda_fb->drm_afbc); > > > > > > Discussed this also with Andrzej on irc on where exactly to place > > > stuff. I think ideally we'd be able to get rid of the custom > > > malidp_fb_create completely, and komeda should also be able to get rid > > > of most of the open-coded checks (it's largely reinveting > > > drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs, imo better to just call that first, then > > > then do a few more calls of the specific things you need to have > > > computed in addition). > > > -Daniel > > > > The afbc support is the only reason why malidp/komeda define our own > > fb_create(), it is good for komeda and malidp if we put afbc support > > directly into the standard drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs. > > > > BTW: > > > > can we add one more argument: fb_struct_size to > > > > drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs(..., size_t fb_struct_size); > > > > then driver can use it to extend its own fb struct and add some private > > infos. > > Hm, this isn't how we usually do it for subclassing - the trouble with > this is that the size of the allocation is very far away from where we > actually allocate, automated checkers have a harder time with this > pattern. > > Usually what we do is split the kzalloc out from the _create function, > leaving just _init behind. Then you have roughly (pseudo-code): > > drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs(args) { > struct drm_gem_fb *fb; > > fb = kzalloc(sizeof(*fb)); > if (!fb) > return -ENOMEM; > > return drm_gem_fb_init_with_functions(fb, args); > } > > If you then need a bigger function, you just allocate that bigger > function, and pass &fb->base to the _init function. Costs 3 additional > lines (for the kzalloc and error checking), but easier to read&verify for > both humans and compilers. > > I guess what we could then do is create a drm_gem_afbc_create function > which sets this all up for a > > struct drm_gem_afbc_framebuffer { > struct drm_gem_framebuffer base; > /* afbc stuff */ > }; > > and then also fills out all derived afbc values, so more than just > calling drm_gem_fb_init_with_functions. And drivers could still have their > own version with even more checks on top. > > And all afbc supporting drivers could then use that. Feels a bit like > overengineering to me, but if you feel like that's justified to do it's a > good solution. Hi Daniel: This solution looks good, it can fit all our requirement. Thanks James. > Cheers, Daniel > > > > Thanks > > James > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > James > > > > > > > > > For reworking drm_framebuffer itself I think it's probably a bit too > > > > > earlier. And if we do it, we should maybe go a bit more bold, aiming to > > > > > property-fy all the framebuffer settings, maybe even making it extensible, > > > > > and have drivers handle a corresponding drm_framebuffer_state. > > > > > > > > > > A third option would be to create a drm_afbc_framebuffer which embeds > > > > > drm_framebuffer and which drivers would need to use. But also feels a bit > > > > > like too much churn. Recomputing should be quick enough and much easier. > > > > > -Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks anyways for taking a stab at this. > > > > > > > -Ayan > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp, > > > > > > > > + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, > > > > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h, > > > > > > > > + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0], > > > > > > > > + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT)) > > > > > > > > goto check_failed; > > > > > > > > - } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fb->obj[0] = obj; > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Daniel Vetter > > > > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > > > > > http://blog.ffwll.ch > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Vetter > > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > > > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8 #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16 -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128 #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256 #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024 #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096 diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> * */ +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h> #include <drm/drm_device.h> #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h> #include <drm/drm_gem.h> @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base; const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format; struct drm_gem_object *obj; - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp; - u64 min_size; + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp; obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]); if (!obj) { @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, return -ENOENT; } - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) { - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8: - alignment_w = 32; - alignment_h = 8; - break; - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16: - alignment_w = 16; - alignment_h = 16; - break; - default: - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n", - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK); - break; + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h)) + return -EINVAL; + + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) && + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) { + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n", + alignment_w, alignment_h); + + return -EINVAL; } /* tiled header afbc */ @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file, goto check_failed; } - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS; - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE, - alignment_header); - bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier); - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks * - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8, - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT); - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0]; - if (min_size > obj->size) { - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n", - obj->size, min_size); + + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp, + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, + alignment_w, alignment_h, + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0], + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT)) goto check_failed; - } fb->obj[0] = obj; return 0;
There are afbc helpers available. Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com> --- .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 - .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)