From patchwork Sun Jun 7 18:18:32 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hans de Goede X-Patchwork-Id: 11591861 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FB9138C for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6AD22076C for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SBi+Ppwv" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E6AD22076C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0491A6E1B6; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:19:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 268E46E1B1 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:19:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1591553952; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=enDmigKPZ6hGhbnIXLCk/1+mW1SDxZUvwf02x4z1WGI=; b=SBi+Ppwvn1GmOj5rahjbmRCUsN3OO+0K1777pF4Yzw4MHBWeOlUvLrzROY/7eH84dW+ISN oAwGJ0yO2/nPpcpjs61fk6857LIFFsHsyVjRcKtWxq9uhT0RHeq1EKJ849nu1TYTrQkoSY tsIcv+02UCimfSSJ2Ldliw4hHPSLMYE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-486-CJJhDXefOBaofatwiqt3zw-1; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 14:19:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CJJhDXefOBaofatwiqt3zw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C36464; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1.localdomain.com (ovpn-112-92.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.92]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168D45C1BD; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:19:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Hans de Goede To: Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6n?= =?utf-8?q?ig?= , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , =?utf-8?b?VmlsbGUgU3ly?= =?utf-8?b?asOkbMOk?= , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown Subject: [PATCH v2 07/15] pwm: crc: Fix off-by-one error in the clock-divider calculations Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:18:32 +0200 Message-Id: <20200607181840.13536-8-hdegoede@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200607181840.13536-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <20200607181840.13536-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Hans de Goede , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" The CRC PWM controller has a clock-divider which divides the clock with a value between 1-128. But as can seen from the PWM_DIV_CLK_xxx defines, this range maps to a register value of 0-127. So after calculating the clock-divider we must subtract 1 to get the register value, unless the requested frequency was so high that the calculation has already resulted in a (rounded) divider value of 0. Note that before this fix, setting a period of PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS which corresponds to the max. divider value of 128 could have resulted in a bug where the code would use 128 as divider-register value which would have resulted in an actual divider value of 0 (and the enable bit being set). A rounding error stopped this bug from actually happen. This same rounding error means that after the subtraction of 1 it is impossible to set the divider to 128. Also bump PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS by 1 ns to allow setting a divider of 128 (register-value 127). Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c index 43fc912c1fe9..5ba2a65c524c 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #define PWM_MAX_LEVEL 0xFF #define PWM_BASE_CLK_MHZ 6 /* 6 MHz */ -#define PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS 5461333 /* 183 Hz */ +#define PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS 5461334 /* 183 Hz */ #define NSEC_PER_MHZ 1000 @@ -75,6 +75,9 @@ static int crc_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm, /* changing the clk divisor, need to disable fisrt */ crc_pwm_disable(c, pwm); clk_div = PWM_BASE_CLK_MHZ * period_ns / (256 * NSEC_PER_MHZ); + /* clk_div 1 - 128, maps to register values 0-127 */ + if (clk_div > 0) + clk_div--; regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, clk_div | PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE);