[5/5] drm/vblank: Use spin_(un)lock_irq() in drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl()

Commit Message

Lyude Paul July 20, 2020, 7:07 p.m. UTC

This is an ioctl callback, so we're guaranteed to have IRQs enabled when
calling this function. Use the plain _irq() variants of spin_(un)lock()
to make this more obvious.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[e-mail]>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 64610070ba473..b18e1efbbae1a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -2066,7 +2066,6 @@  int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	u64 seq;
 	u64 req_seq;
 	int ret;
-	unsigned long spin_flags;
 
 	if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -2114,7 +2113,7 @@  int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	e->event.base.length = sizeof(e->event.seq);
 	e->event.seq.user_data = queue_seq->user_data;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, spin_flags);
+	spin_lock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * drm_crtc_vblank_off() might have been called after we called
@@ -2145,11 +2144,11 @@  int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 		queue_seq->sequence = req_seq;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, spin_flags);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
 	return 0;
 
 err_unlock:
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, spin_flags);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
 	drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
 err_free:
 	kfree(e);