From patchwork Sun Aug 30 12:57:40 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hans de Goede X-Patchwork-Id: 11744913 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60000722 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E5FD2087D for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DCZ4xd3K" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3E5FD2087D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DFC6E2DA; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:58:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E65E66E2BE for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:58:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1598792297; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3mqN9rDcCqr7nh6Hbhh29SJWkRViinBk1n4ManKQOrs=; b=DCZ4xd3KNsAElw9fuVO7em5Yk6IRdAX+cyWtDgLcWlWoXfpR5xZlRjcNzclg0cLb2hdiSB cliBiubh7N33GD2qEgDRM9CD4AS42ZXK3xvHC4nhEX+3akjO/iUfMD4w/AgeXCvUPSCXeN sE1JCQr5o3irAmbRzKE2Rut+PJJyEPE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-197-jz6kLySpPp6dLn2bYyqU8A-1; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:58:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: jz6kLySpPp6dLn2bYyqU8A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3027E801AC3; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1.localdomain.com (ovpn-112-77.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.77]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B64171C6; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:58:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Hans de Goede To: Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6n?= =?utf-8?q?ig?= , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , =?utf-8?b?VmlsbGUgU3lyasOkbMOk?= , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown Subject: [PATCH v8 04/17] pwm: lpss: Add range limit check for the base_unit register value Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:57:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20200830125753.230420-5-hdegoede@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200830125753.230420-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <20200830125753.230420-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Hans de Goede , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" When the user requests a high enough period ns value, then the calculations in pwm_lpss_prepare() might result in a base_unit value of 0. But according to the data-sheet the way the PWM controller works is that each input clock-cycle the base_unit gets added to a N bit counter and that counter overflowing determines the PWM output frequency. Adding 0 to the counter is a no-op. The data-sheet even explicitly states that writing 0 to the base_unit bits will result in the PWM outputting a continuous 0 signal. When the user requestes a low enough period ns value, then the calculations in pwm_lpss_prepare() might result in a base_unit value which is bigger then base_unit_range - 1. Currently the codes for this deals with this by applying a mask: base_unit &= (base_unit_range - 1); But this means that we let the value overflow the range, we throw away the higher bits and store whatever value is left in the lower bits into the register leading to a random output frequency, rather then clamping the output frequency to the highest frequency which the hardware can do. This commit fixes both issues by clamping the base_unit value to be between 1 and (base_unit_range - 1). Fixes: 684309e5043e ("pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit") Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Acked-by: Thierry Reding --- Changes in v5: - Use clamp_val(... instead of clam_t(unsigned long long, ... Changes in v3: - Change upper limit of clamp to (base_unit_range - 1) - Add Fixes tag --- drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c index 43b1fc634af1..da9bc3d10104 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm, freq *= base_unit_range; base_unit = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(freq, c); + /* base_unit must not be 0 and we also want to avoid overflowing it */ + base_unit = clamp_val(base_unit, 1, base_unit_range - 1); on_time_div = 255ULL * duty_ns; do_div(on_time_div, period_ns); @@ -105,7 +107,6 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm, orig_ctrl = ctrl = pwm_lpss_read(pwm); ctrl &= ~PWM_ON_TIME_DIV_MASK; ctrl &= ~((base_unit_range - 1) << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT); - base_unit &= (base_unit_range - 1); ctrl |= (u32) base_unit << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT; ctrl |= on_time_div;