From patchwork Thu Nov 19 14:41:42 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 11917643 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E51C8301B for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0D4F24726 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="i1Sv/jjK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E0D4F24726 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7859F6E59B; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com (mail-wr1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B156E542 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id s8so6651895wrw.10 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 06:42:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0DCehF4zZ3fhQRejLB/8aYMpRa95wWTeDCqZJ49ug5U=; b=i1Sv/jjKYQNSH5Pz1p4TGEKHSE0hAsyjZLamNltZNlFfnx9kl1jNBiB7w7S5eMBcEx E2grbscvm5lSzF9JX11ScuBzFqjEJLeR8ycnUqFVbKeoeXJ7FGw5EgP4pWvc8Lt+7BCO wM8PlYMmj8jYsifflCGxslxUT8/cqKq33xazI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0DCehF4zZ3fhQRejLB/8aYMpRa95wWTeDCqZJ49ug5U=; b=Sv0LZ8ZddszbSUbz3tQt0xAeRTMdsD4IDtPj4jiTb1nxIpgRpcH2sxTvbxnNc5wcRV +JyasWODPytzXgeqq4kIHqZiWSM2NRvqdsolDl1UC7rHFCrObnQBLAiS2iRNyff7pQJ8 0fnC9il12ijZMNZFGFKNHCluAKRIL2AECp/AGDzNGUIuTh7pyPFUCqb8CQUMRIYVRSwY SUeykUv9aM5CPrzggjgrbxfhKgYB8Bz4hivcPzF7asfM2KX353HLfCac3Cfq4Elzc5qY nt+8gzMdMc0AkpiFfXwYEpnUgXtg6yfGIWFyXvJe9GbvHkeRFhGWDUuL36RLRG8TzlfK CIzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533v0clUjzuxpIWFHwmJmmkFG4UBNvdAzT3nXJt4m80ORqjtL32r asSxqSbBqX1gbC2aS2S/VtLG3i/nbworOg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRDiYEVmrnM9D+VsbIGMAPURrigSEJrBogS0M9J7biGvurleAJJ9e0+X8pidbyd6ZTdX7+3w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:c452:: with SMTP id a18mr10837202wrg.189.1605796931124; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 06:42:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x63sm51292wmb.48.2020.11.19.06.42.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 06:42:10 -0800 (PST) From: Daniel Vetter To: DRI Development , LKML Subject: [PATCH v6 13/17] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:41:42 +0100 Message-Id: <20201119144146.1045202-14-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201119144146.1045202-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20201119144146.1045202-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Kees Cook , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Daniel Vetter , David Hildenbrand , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-mm@kvack.org, =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Arnd Bergmann , John Hubbard , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Vetter , Dan Williams , Andrew Morton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" We want all iomem mmaps to consistently revoke ptes when the kernel takes over and CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM is enabled. This includes the pci bar mmaps available through procfs and sysfs, which currently do not revoke mappings. To prepare for this, move the code from the /dev/kmem driver to kernel/resource.c. During review Jason spotted that barriers are used somewhat inconsistently. Fix that up while we shuffle this code, since it doesn't have an actual impact at runtime. Otherwise no semantic and behavioural changes intended, just code extraction and adjusting comments and names. Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: John Hubbard Cc: Jérôme Glisse Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Dan Williams Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- v3: - add barrier for consistency and document why we don't have to check for NULL (Jason) v4 - Adjust comments to reflect the general nature of this iomem revoke code now (Dan) v6: - An unintentional change which caused side-effects of this refactoring is that iomem_get_mapping returned NULL for !CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM. But that makes core vfs code blow up, which assumes a mapping always exists. Undo that accidentional change. Reported by John. - Augment the commit message to explain what actually changed with this extraction (also John). --- drivers/char/mem.c | 85 +----------------------------------- include/linux/ioport.h | 6 +-- kernel/resource.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c index 7dcf9e4ea79d..43c871dc7477 100644 --- a/drivers/char/mem.c +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c @@ -31,9 +31,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include -#include -#include #ifdef CONFIG_IA64 # include @@ -836,42 +833,6 @@ static loff_t memory_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int orig) return ret; } -static struct inode *devmem_inode; - -#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM -void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) -{ - /* pairs with smp_store_release() in devmem_init_inode() */ - struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&devmem_inode); - - /* - * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race - * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before - * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent /dev/mem from - * establishing mappings. - */ - if (!inode) - return; - - /* - * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked - * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed() - * should start returning false, however for performance this - * does not iterate the entire resource range. - */ - if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) && - devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) { - /* - * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the - * worst that can happen?" - */ - return; - } - - unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1); -} -#endif - static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) { int rc; @@ -891,7 +852,7 @@ static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) * revocations when drivers want to take over a /dev/mem mapped * range. */ - filp->f_mapping = inode->i_mapping; + filp->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping(); return 0; } @@ -1023,48 +984,6 @@ static char *mem_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode) static struct class *mem_class; -static int devmem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc) -{ - return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM; -} - -static struct file_system_type devmem_fs_type = { - .name = "devmem", - .owner = THIS_MODULE, - .init_fs_context = devmem_fs_init_fs_context, - .kill_sb = kill_anon_super, -}; - -static int devmem_init_inode(void) -{ - static struct vfsmount *devmem_vfs_mount; - static int devmem_fs_cnt; - struct inode *inode; - int rc; - - rc = simple_pin_fs(&devmem_fs_type, &devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt); - if (rc < 0) { - pr_err("Cannot mount /dev/mem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc); - return rc; - } - - inode = alloc_anon_inode(devmem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb); - if (IS_ERR(inode)) { - rc = PTR_ERR(inode); - pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for /dev/mem: %d\n", rc); - simple_release_fs(&devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt); - return rc; - } - - /* - * Publish /dev/mem initialized. - * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_devmem(). - */ - smp_store_release(&devmem_inode, inode); - - return 0; -} - static int __init chr_dev_init(void) { int minor; @@ -1086,8 +1005,6 @@ static int __init chr_dev_init(void) */ if ((minor == DEVPORT_MINOR) && !arch_has_dev_port()) continue; - if ((minor == DEVMEM_MINOR) && devmem_init_inode() != 0) - continue; device_create(mem_class, NULL, MKDEV(MEM_MAJOR, minor), NULL, devlist[minor].name); diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h index 5135d4b86cd6..02a5466245c0 100644 --- a/include/linux/ioport.h +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h @@ -307,11 +307,7 @@ struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev, struct resource *request_free_mem_region(struct resource *base, unsigned long size, const char *name); -#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM -void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res); -#else -static inline void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) { }; -#endif +extern struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void); #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif /* _LINUX_IOPORT_H */ diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c index 3ae2f56cc79d..c3d71db7a40e 100644 --- a/kernel/resource.c +++ b/kernel/resource.c @@ -18,12 +18,15 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include #include #include +#include #include +#include #include @@ -1115,6 +1118,55 @@ resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res) static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(muxed_resource_wait); +static struct inode *iomem_inode; + +#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM +static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) +{ + /* pairs with smp_store_release() in iomem_init_inode() */ + struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode); + + /* + * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race + * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before + * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent iomem_get_mapping users + * from establishing mappings. + */ + if (!inode) + return; + + /* + * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked + * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed() + * should start returning false, however for performance this + * does not iterate the entire resource range. + */ + if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) && + devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) { + /* + * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the + * worst that can happen?" + */ + return; + } + + unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1); +} +#else +static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) {} +#endif + +struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void) +{ + /* + * This function is only called from file open paths, hence guaranteed + * that fs_initcalls have completed and no need to check for NULL. But + * since revoke_iomem can be called before the initcall we still need + * the barrier to appease checkers. + */ + return smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode)->i_mapping; +} + /** * __request_region - create a new busy resource region * @parent: parent resource descriptor @@ -1182,7 +1234,7 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent, write_unlock(&resource_lock); if (res && orig_parent == &iomem_resource) - revoke_devmem(res); + revoke_iomem(res); return res; } @@ -1782,4 +1834,48 @@ static int __init strict_iomem(char *str) return 1; } +static int iomem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc) +{ + return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM; +} + +static struct file_system_type iomem_fs_type = { + .name = "iomem", + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .init_fs_context = iomem_fs_init_fs_context, + .kill_sb = kill_anon_super, +}; + +static int __init iomem_init_inode(void) +{ + static struct vfsmount *iomem_vfs_mount; + static int iomem_fs_cnt; + struct inode *inode; + int rc; + + rc = simple_pin_fs(&iomem_fs_type, &iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt); + if (rc < 0) { + pr_err("Cannot mount iomem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc); + return rc; + } + + inode = alloc_anon_inode(iomem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb); + if (IS_ERR(inode)) { + rc = PTR_ERR(inode); + pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for iomem: %d\n", rc); + simple_release_fs(&iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt); + return rc; + } + + /* + * Publish iomem revocation inode initialized. + * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_iomem(). + */ + smp_store_release(&iomem_inode, inode); + + return 0; +} + +fs_initcall(iomem_init_inode); + __setup("iomem=", strict_iomem);