Message ID | 20201120152338.1203257-1-ccr@tnsp.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/nouveau: fix relocations applying logic and a double-free | expand |
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:23 PM Matti Hamalainen <ccr@tnsp.org> wrote: > > Commit 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl") included > a logic-bug which results in the relocations not actually getting > applied at all as the call to nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply() is > never reached. This causes a regression with graphical corruption, > triggered when relocations need to be done (for example after a > suspend/resume cycle.) > > Fix by setting *apply_relocs value only if there were more than 0 > relocations. > > Additionally, the never reached code had a leftover u_free() call, > which, after fixing the logic, now got called and resulted in a > double-free. Fix by removing one u_free(), moving the other > and adding check for errors. > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> > Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Signed-off-by: Matti Hamalainen <ccr@tnsp.org> > Fixes: 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl") > Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/11 Link: is for the mailing list submission of the patch itself (to link the git log to the mailing list discussions), this should be References: or similar. Aside from this: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Ben, I'm assuming you'll push this through your tree. -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c > index 549bc67feabb..c2051380d18c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c > @@ -558,8 +558,10 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(struct nouveau_channel *chan, > NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "validating bo list\n"); > validate_fini(op, chan, NULL, NULL); > return ret; > + } else if (ret > 0) { > + *apply_relocs = true; > } > - *apply_relocs = ret; > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -662,7 +664,6 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct nouveau_cli *cli, > nouveau_bo_wr32(nvbo, r->reloc_bo_offset >> 2, data); > } > > - u_free(reloc); > return ret; > } > > @@ -872,9 +873,10 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > break; > } > } > - u_free(reloc); > } > out_prevalid: > + if (!IS_ERR(reloc)) > + u_free(reloc); > u_free(bo); > u_free(push); > > > base-commit: 3494d58865ad4a47611dbb427b214cc5227fa5eb > -- > 2.29.2 >
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:51:25AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:23 PM Matti Hamalainen <ccr@tnsp.org> wrote: > > > > Commit 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl") included > > a logic-bug which results in the relocations not actually getting > > applied at all as the call to nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply() is > > never reached. This causes a regression with graphical corruption, > > triggered when relocations need to be done (for example after a > > suspend/resume cycle.) > > > > Fix by setting *apply_relocs value only if there were more than 0 > > relocations. > > > > Additionally, the never reached code had a leftover u_free() call, > > which, after fixing the logic, now got called and resulted in a > > double-free. Fix by removing one u_free(), moving the other > > and adding check for errors. > > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> > > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> > > Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > Signed-off-by: Matti Hamalainen <ccr@tnsp.org> > > Fixes: 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl") > > Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/11 > > Link: is for the mailing list submission of the patch itself (to link > the git log to the mailing list discussions), this should be > References: or similar. Aside from this: > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> > > Ben, I'm assuming you'll push this through your tree. Ok Dave asked me to just push it into drm-misc-fixes. Thanks for your patch! -Daniel > -Daniel > > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c > > index 549bc67feabb..c2051380d18c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c > > @@ -558,8 +558,10 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(struct nouveau_channel *chan, > > NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "validating bo list\n"); > > validate_fini(op, chan, NULL, NULL); > > return ret; > > + } else if (ret > 0) { > > + *apply_relocs = true; > > } > > - *apply_relocs = ret; > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -662,7 +664,6 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct nouveau_cli *cli, > > nouveau_bo_wr32(nvbo, r->reloc_bo_offset >> 2, data); > > } > > > > - u_free(reloc); > > return ret; > > } > > > > @@ -872,9 +873,10 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > > break; > > } > > } > > - u_free(reloc); > > } > > out_prevalid: > > + if (!IS_ERR(reloc)) > > + u_free(reloc); > > u_free(bo); > > u_free(push); > > > > > > base-commit: 3494d58865ad4a47611dbb427b214cc5227fa5eb > > -- > > 2.29.2 > > > > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c index 549bc67feabb..c2051380d18c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c @@ -558,8 +558,10 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(struct nouveau_channel *chan, NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "validating bo list\n"); validate_fini(op, chan, NULL, NULL); return ret; + } else if (ret > 0) { + *apply_relocs = true; } - *apply_relocs = ret; + return 0; } @@ -662,7 +664,6 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct nouveau_cli *cli, nouveau_bo_wr32(nvbo, r->reloc_bo_offset >> 2, data); } - u_free(reloc); return ret; } @@ -872,9 +873,10 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, break; } } - u_free(reloc); } out_prevalid: + if (!IS_ERR(reloc)) + u_free(reloc); u_free(bo); u_free(push);
Commit 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl") included a logic-bug which results in the relocations not actually getting applied at all as the call to nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply() is never reached. This causes a regression with graphical corruption, triggered when relocations need to be done (for example after a suspend/resume cycle.) Fix by setting *apply_relocs value only if there were more than 0 relocations. Additionally, the never reached code had a leftover u_free() call, which, after fixing the logic, now got called and resulted in a double-free. Fix by removing one u_free(), moving the other and adding check for errors. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Matti Hamalainen <ccr@tnsp.org> Fixes: 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl") Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/11 --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) base-commit: 3494d58865ad4a47611dbb427b214cc5227fa5eb