From patchwork Thu Jul 1 20:24:12 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matt Roper X-Patchwork-Id: 12354927 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2D6C11F73 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 20:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D05F613F4 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 20:26:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9D05F613F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BB66EBFE; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 20:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EEF76EC01; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 20:25:23 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10032"; a="188998666" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,315,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="188998666" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jul 2021 13:25:21 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,315,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="644564515" Received: from mdroper-desk1.fm.intel.com ([10.1.27.134]) by fmsmga005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jul 2021 13:25:20 -0700 From: Matt Roper To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH 38/53] drm/i915/dg2: Add dbuf programming Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 13:24:12 -0700 Message-Id: <20210701202427.1547543-39-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.4 In-Reply-To: <20210701202427.1547543-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> References: <20210701202427.1547543-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" DG2 extends our DDB to four DBuf slices; pipes A+B only have access to the first two slices, whereas pipes C+D only have access to the second two. Confusingly, our bspec decided to switch from 1-based numbering of dbuf slices (S1, S2) to 0-based numbering (S0, S1, S2, S3) in Display13. At the moment we're using the 0-based number scheme for the DBUF_CTL_S() register addressing, but the 1-based number scheme in the actual slice assignment tables. We may want to consider switching the assignment over to 0-based numbering too at some point... Bspec: 49255 Bspec: 50057 Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy Signed-off-by: Matt Roper --- .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h | 4 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h index 22367b5cba96..ad788bbd727d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h @@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ intel_display_power_put_all_in_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915, intel_display_power_put_mask_in_set(i915, power_domain_set, power_domain_set->mask); } +/* + * FIXME: We should probably switch this to a 0-based scheme to be consistent + * with how we now name/number DBUF_CTL instances. + */ enum dbuf_slice { DBUF_S1, DBUF_S2, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 5fdb96e7d266..ff8d89fff502 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -4584,6 +4584,117 @@ static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry tgl_allowed_dbufs[] = {} }; +static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry dg2_allowed_dbufs[] = { + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_B), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1), + [PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S2), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_C), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_C), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2), + [PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2), + [PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1), + [PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S2), + [PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_D), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_D), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2), + [PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_D), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2), + [PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_D), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1), + [PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S2), + [PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3), + [PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2), + [PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3), + [PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2), + [PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3), + [PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + { + .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D), + .dbuf_mask = { + [PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1), + [PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S2), + [PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3), + [PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S4), + }, + }, + {} +}; + static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry adlp_allowed_dbufs[] = { { .active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A), @@ -4759,12 +4870,19 @@ static u32 adlp_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u32 active_pipes) return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, adlp_allowed_dbufs); } +static u32 dg2_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u32 active_pipes) +{ + return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, dg2_allowed_dbufs); +} + static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(struct intel_crtc *crtc, u8 active_pipes) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev); enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe; - if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv)) + if (IS_DG2(dev_priv)) + return dg2_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes); + else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv)) return adlp_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes); else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 12) return tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);