Message ID | 20220524183320.28870-1-harry.wentland@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm: Don't block HDR_OUTPUT_METADATA on unknown EOTF | expand |
On Tue, 24 May 2022 14:33:20 -0400 Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> wrote: > The supported EOTFs are defined in eotf_supported in drm_edid > but userspace has no way of knowing what is and isn't supported > when creating an HDR_OUTPUT_METADATA and will only know > something is wrong when the atomic commit fails. Hi Harry, maybe clarify here the two different sets of "supported": EDID data vs. kernel code? I think the paragraph uses the same word for both meanings. > > Since it is expected that userspace reads the EDID to understand > what the display supports it doesn't make sense for DRM to block > an HDR_OUTPUT_METADATA if it contains an EOTF the kernel doesn't > understand. > > This comes with the added benefit of future-proofing metadata > support. If the spec defines a new EOTF there is no need to > update DRM and an compositor can immediately make use of it. > > Fixes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/-/issues/609 > > Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> > Cc: ppaalanen@gmail.com > Cc: sebastian.wick@redhat.com > Cc: vprosyak@amd.com > Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> Acked-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com> Thanks, pq > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > index 12893e7be89b..223f96a72064 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > @@ -5691,10 +5691,8 @@ drm_hdmi_infoframe_set_hdr_metadata(struct hdmi_drm_infoframe *frame, > > /* Sink EOTF is Bit map while infoframe is absolute values */ > if (!is_eotf_supported(hdr_metadata->hdmi_metadata_type1.eotf, > - connector->hdr_sink_metadata.hdmi_type1.eotf)) { > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EOTF Not Supported\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + connector->hdr_sink_metadata.hdmi_type1.eotf)) > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unknown EOTF %d\n", hdr_metadata->hdmi_metadata_type1.eotf); > > err = hdmi_drm_infoframe_init(frame); > if (err < 0)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c index 12893e7be89b..223f96a72064 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c @@ -5691,10 +5691,8 @@ drm_hdmi_infoframe_set_hdr_metadata(struct hdmi_drm_infoframe *frame, /* Sink EOTF is Bit map while infoframe is absolute values */ if (!is_eotf_supported(hdr_metadata->hdmi_metadata_type1.eotf, - connector->hdr_sink_metadata.hdmi_type1.eotf)) { - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EOTF Not Supported\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } + connector->hdr_sink_metadata.hdmi_type1.eotf)) + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unknown EOTF %d\n", hdr_metadata->hdmi_metadata_type1.eotf); err = hdmi_drm_infoframe_init(frame); if (err < 0)
The supported EOTFs are defined in eotf_supported in drm_edid but userspace has no way of knowing what is and isn't supported when creating an HDR_OUTPUT_METADATA and will only know something is wrong when the atomic commit fails. Since it is expected that userspace reads the EDID to understand what the display supports it doesn't make sense for DRM to block an HDR_OUTPUT_METADATA if it contains an EOTF the kernel doesn't understand. This comes with the added benefit of future-proofing metadata support. If the spec defines a new EOTF there is no need to update DRM and an compositor can immediately make use of it. Fixes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/-/issues/609 Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Cc: ppaalanen@gmail.com Cc: sebastian.wick@redhat.com Cc: vprosyak@amd.com Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)