| Message ID | 20220720162314.1.Ieef5bc3848df40b71605b70bb571d6429e8978de@changeid (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm/panel-edp: Fix typo in kerneldoc comment (appers=>appears) | expand |
Sam, On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:23 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote: > > Ever since I got the spell-check working in my editor this one has > been bugging me. Fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c > index e6645d6e9b59..07a383dff548 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct panel_delay { > * before the HPD signal is reliable. Ideally this is 0 but some panels, > * board designs, or bad pulldown configs can cause a glitch here. > * > - * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appers to be much too big. > + * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appears to be much too big. > * Presumably some old panels simply didn't have HPD hooked up and put > * the hpd_absent here because this field predates the > * hpd_absent. While that works, it's non-ideal. Maybe you'd be willing to give me an "Ack" for this stupid little patch so I can land it? ;-) -Doug
Hi Douglas, On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 08:03:11AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > Sam, > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:23 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > Ever since I got the spell-check working in my editor this one has > > been bugging me. Fix it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c > > index e6645d6e9b59..07a383dff548 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c > > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct panel_delay { > > * before the HPD signal is reliable. Ideally this is 0 but some panels, > > * board designs, or bad pulldown configs can cause a glitch here. > > * > > - * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appers to be much too big. > > + * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appears to be much too big. > > * Presumably some old panels simply didn't have HPD hooked up and put > > * the hpd_absent here because this field predates the > > * hpd_absent. While that works, it's non-ideal. > > Maybe you'd be willing to give me an "Ack" for this stupid little > patch so I can land it? ;-) Certainly. Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c index e6645d6e9b59..07a383dff548 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct panel_delay { * before the HPD signal is reliable. Ideally this is 0 but some panels, * board designs, or bad pulldown configs can cause a glitch here. * - * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appers to be much too big. + * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appears to be much too big. * Presumably some old panels simply didn't have HPD hooked up and put * the hpd_absent here because this field predates the * hpd_absent. While that works, it's non-ideal.
Ever since I got the spell-check working in my editor this one has been bugging me. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)