Message ID | 20230426061718.755586-1-olvaffe@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] drm/amdgpu: add a missing lock for AMDGPU_SCHED | expand |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:17:14PM -0700, Chia-I Wu wrote: > mgr->ctx_handles should be protected by mgr->lock. > > v2: improve commit message > > Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org What commit id does this fix? How far back in stable kernels should this go? thanks, greg k-h
Am 26.04.23 um 08:17 schrieb Chia-I Wu: > mgr->ctx_handles should be protected by mgr->lock. > > v2: improve commit message > > Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Please don't manually CC stable@vger.kernel.org while sending patches out, let us maintainers push that upstream with the appropriate tag and Greg picking it up from there. A Fixes tag and figuring out to which stable versions this needs to be backported are nice to have as well, but Alex and I can take care of that as well. Apart from that the technical side of the patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>. Regards, Christian. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c > index e9b45089a28a6..863b2a34b2d64 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > { > struct fd f = fdget(fd); > struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv; > + struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr; > struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx; > uint32_t id; > int r; > @@ -51,8 +52,11 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > return r; > } > > - idr_for_each_entry(&fpriv->ctx_mgr.ctx_handles, ctx, id) > + mgr = &fpriv->ctx_mgr; > + mutex_lock(&mgr->lock); > + idr_for_each_entry(&mgr->ctx_handles, ctx, id) > amdgpu_ctx_priority_override(ctx, priority); > + mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > fdput(f); > return 0;
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 4:05 AM Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote: > > Am 26.04.23 um 08:17 schrieb Chia-I Wu: > > mgr->ctx_handles should be protected by mgr->lock. > > > > v2: improve commit message > > > > Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Please don't manually CC stable@vger.kernel.org while sending patches > out, let us maintainers push that upstream with the appropriate tag and > Greg picking it up from there. > > A Fixes tag and figuring out to which stable versions this needs to be > backported are nice to have as well, but Alex and I can take care of > that as well. > > Apart from that the technical side of the patch is Reviewed-by: > Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>. All done. Thanks for clarifying the process and sorry for getting it wrong in the first place :( > > Regards, > Christian. > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c | 6 +++++- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c > > index e9b45089a28a6..863b2a34b2d64 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c > > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > > { > > struct fd f = fdget(fd); > > struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv; > > + struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr; > > struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx; > > uint32_t id; > > int r; > > @@ -51,8 +52,11 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > > return r; > > } > > > > - idr_for_each_entry(&fpriv->ctx_mgr.ctx_handles, ctx, id) > > + mgr = &fpriv->ctx_mgr; > > + mutex_lock(&mgr->lock); > > + idr_for_each_entry(&mgr->ctx_handles, ctx, id) > > amdgpu_ctx_priority_override(ctx, priority); > > + mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > > > fdput(f); > > return 0; >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c index e9b45089a28a6..863b2a34b2d64 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, { struct fd f = fdget(fd); struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv; + struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr; struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx; uint32_t id; int r; @@ -51,8 +52,11 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, return r; } - idr_for_each_entry(&fpriv->ctx_mgr.ctx_handles, ctx, id) + mgr = &fpriv->ctx_mgr; + mutex_lock(&mgr->lock); + idr_for_each_entry(&mgr->ctx_handles, ctx, id) amdgpu_ctx_priority_override(ctx, priority); + mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock); fdput(f); return 0;
mgr->ctx_handles should be protected by mgr->lock. v2: improve commit message Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)