Message ID | 20230517132214.254757-2-raphael.gallais-pou@foss.st.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | STM32 warning cleanup | expand |
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts index 5a0daf8e8b11..cbbd521bf010 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ dsi_out: endpoint { }; }; - panel-dsi@0 { + panel@0 { compatible = "orisetech,otm8009a"; reg = <0>; /* dsi virtual channel (0..3) */ reset-gpios = <&gpioh 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ <dc { status = "okay"; port { - ltdc_out_dsi: endpoint@0 { + ltdc_out_dsi: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&dsi_in>; }; };
Several warnings appear when building and checking stm32f429 device-tree: arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts:182.28-184.5: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/display-controller@40016800/port/endpoint@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property .../arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dtb: dsi@40016c00: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('panel-dsi@0' was unexpected) From schema: .../Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-dsi.yaml Fix those. Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@foss.st.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)