Message ID | 20230719110729.618733-6-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Update AUX invalidation sequence | expand |
Some of the patches are needed to be backported to v5.8 so I wonder if you should do the refactoring later in the series. I guess best way is to check if you can apply the series in v5.8 On 7/19/2023 1:07 PM, Andi Shyti wrote: > Just a trivial refactoring for reducing the number of code > duplicate. This will come at handy in the next commits. > > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c | 44 +++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c > index 7566c89d9def3..1b1dadacfbf42 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c > @@ -177,23 +177,31 @@ u32 *gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 *cs, const i915_reg_t inv > return cs; > } > > +static u32 *intel_emit_pipe_control_cs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 bit_group_0, > + u32 bit_group_1, u32 offset) > +{ > + u32 *cs; > + > + cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); > + if (IS_ERR(cs)) > + return cs; > + > + cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, > + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > + intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); > + > + return cs; > +} > + > static int mtl_dummy_pipe_control(struct i915_request *rq) > { > /* Wa_14016712196 */ > if (IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, M, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) || > - IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, P, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) { > - u32 *cs; > - > - /* dummy PIPE_CONTROL + depth flush */ > - cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); > - if (IS_ERR(cs)) > - return PTR_ERR(cs); > - cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, > - 0, > - PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH, > - LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > - intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); > - } > + IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, P, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) > + intel_emit_pipe_control_cs(rq, > + 0, > + PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH, > + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > > return 0; > } > @@ -210,7 +218,6 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) > u32 bit_group_0 = 0; > u32 bit_group_1 = 0; > int err; > - u32 *cs; > > err = mtl_dummy_pipe_control(rq); > if (err) > @@ -237,13 +244,8 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) > else if (engine->class == COMPUTE_CLASS) > bit_group_1 &= ~PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS; > > - cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); > - if (IS_ERR(cs)) > - return PTR_ERR(cs); > - > - cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, > - LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > - intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); > + intel_emit_pipe_control_cs(rq, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, > + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > } > > if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE) {
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 01:07:25PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote: > Just a trivial refactoring for reducing the number of code > duplicate. This will come at handy in the next commits. > > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c | 44 +++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c > index 7566c89d9def3..1b1dadacfbf42 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c > @@ -177,23 +177,31 @@ u32 *gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 *cs, const i915_reg_t inv > return cs; > } > > +static u32 *intel_emit_pipe_control_cs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 bit_group_0, This is another case where it gets confusing because this function name sounds like it's something generic, but it actually only applies to a small subset of platforms (gen12). > + u32 bit_group_1, u32 offset) > +{ > + u32 *cs; > + > + cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); > + if (IS_ERR(cs)) > + return cs; We're not actually checking for this error at the callsites. Should we be checking for it and propagating it farther up the call stack? > + > + cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, > + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > + intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); > + > + return cs; This cursor never gets used for anything. We can probably just make this function return an int error code. Matt > +} > + > static int mtl_dummy_pipe_control(struct i915_request *rq) > { > /* Wa_14016712196 */ > if (IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, M, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) || > - IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, P, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) { > - u32 *cs; > - > - /* dummy PIPE_CONTROL + depth flush */ > - cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); > - if (IS_ERR(cs)) > - return PTR_ERR(cs); > - cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, > - 0, > - PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH, > - LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > - intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); > - } > + IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, P, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) > + intel_emit_pipe_control_cs(rq, > + 0, > + PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH, > + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > > return 0; > } > @@ -210,7 +218,6 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) > u32 bit_group_0 = 0; > u32 bit_group_1 = 0; > int err; > - u32 *cs; > > err = mtl_dummy_pipe_control(rq); > if (err) > @@ -237,13 +244,8 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) > else if (engine->class == COMPUTE_CLASS) > bit_group_1 &= ~PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS; > > - cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); > - if (IS_ERR(cs)) > - return PTR_ERR(cs); > - > - cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, > - LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > - intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); > + intel_emit_pipe_control_cs(rq, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, > + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); > } > > if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE) { > -- > 2.40.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c index 7566c89d9def3..1b1dadacfbf42 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c @@ -177,23 +177,31 @@ u32 *gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 *cs, const i915_reg_t inv return cs; } +static u32 *intel_emit_pipe_control_cs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 bit_group_0, + u32 bit_group_1, u32 offset) +{ + u32 *cs; + + cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); + if (IS_ERR(cs)) + return cs; + + cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); + intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); + + return cs; +} + static int mtl_dummy_pipe_control(struct i915_request *rq) { /* Wa_14016712196 */ if (IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, M, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) || - IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, P, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) { - u32 *cs; - - /* dummy PIPE_CONTROL + depth flush */ - cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); - if (IS_ERR(cs)) - return PTR_ERR(cs); - cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, - 0, - PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH, - LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); - intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); - } + IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(rq->engine->i915, P, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) + intel_emit_pipe_control_cs(rq, + 0, + PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH, + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); return 0; } @@ -210,7 +218,6 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) u32 bit_group_0 = 0; u32 bit_group_1 = 0; int err; - u32 *cs; err = mtl_dummy_pipe_control(rq); if (err) @@ -237,13 +244,8 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) else if (engine->class == COMPUTE_CLASS) bit_group_1 &= ~PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS; - cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6); - if (IS_ERR(cs)) - return PTR_ERR(cs); - - cs = gen12_emit_pipe_control(cs, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, - LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); - intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); + intel_emit_pipe_control_cs(rq, bit_group_0, bit_group_1, + LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR); } if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE) {
Just a trivial refactoring for reducing the number of code duplicate. This will come at handy in the next commits. Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c | 44 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)