Message ID | 20240508065720.125846-1-Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/buddy: Fix the range bias clear memory allocation issue | expand |
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 12:27:20PM +0530, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote: > Problem statement: During the system boot time, an application request > for the bulk volume of cleared range bias memory when the clear_avail > is zero, we dont fallback into normal allocation method as we had an > unnecessary clear_avail check which prevents the fallback method leads > to fb allocation failure following system goes into unresponsive state. > > Solution: Remove the unnecessary clear_avail check in the range bias > allocation function. > > Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com> > Fixes: 96950929eb23 ("drm/buddy: Implement tracking clear page feature") > Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Can you please also add a kunit test case to exercise this corner case and make sure it stays fixed? Thanks, Sima > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c > index 284ebae71cc4..831929ac95eb 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c > @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ __drm_buddy_alloc_range_bias(struct drm_buddy *mm, > > block = __alloc_range_bias(mm, start, end, order, > flags, fallback); > - if (IS_ERR(block) && mm->clear_avail) > + if (IS_ERR(block)) > return __alloc_range_bias(mm, start, end, order, > flags, !fallback); > > -- > 2.25.1 >
Hi Daniel, On 5/8/2024 2:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 12:27:20PM +0530, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote: >> Problem statement: During the system boot time, an application request >> for the bulk volume of cleared range bias memory when the clear_avail >> is zero, we dont fallback into normal allocation method as we had an >> unnecessary clear_avail check which prevents the fallback method leads >> to fb allocation failure following system goes into unresponsive state. >> >> Solution: Remove the unnecessary clear_avail check in the range bias >> allocation function. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com> >> Fixes: 96950929eb23 ("drm/buddy: Implement tracking clear page feature") >> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Can you please also add a kunit test case to exercise this corner case and > make sure it stays fixed? I have sent the v2 along with a kunit test case for this corner case. Thanks, Arun. > > Thanks, Sima >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c >> index 284ebae71cc4..831929ac95eb 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c >> @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ __drm_buddy_alloc_range_bias(struct drm_buddy *mm, >> >> block = __alloc_range_bias(mm, start, end, order, >> flags, fallback); >> - if (IS_ERR(block) && mm->clear_avail) >> + if (IS_ERR(block)) >> return __alloc_range_bias(mm, start, end, order, >> flags, !fallback); >> >> -- >> 2.25.1 >>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c index 284ebae71cc4..831929ac95eb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ __drm_buddy_alloc_range_bias(struct drm_buddy *mm, block = __alloc_range_bias(mm, start, end, order, flags, fallback); - if (IS_ERR(block) && mm->clear_avail) + if (IS_ERR(block)) return __alloc_range_bias(mm, start, end, order, flags, !fallback);