diff mbox series

[v3,13/14] drm/msm/dp: drop struct msm_dp_panel_in

Message ID 20241212-fd-dp-audio-fixup-v3-13-0b1c65e7dba3@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/msm/dp: perform misc cleanups | expand

Commit Message

Dmitry Baryshkov Dec. 11, 2024, 11:41 p.m. UTC
All other submodules pass arguments directly. Drop struct
msm_dp_panel_in that is used to wrap dp_panel's submodule args and pass
all data to msm_dp_panel_get() directly.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c |  9 +--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c   | 15 ++++++++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h   | 10 ++--------
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Comments

Abhinav Kumar Dec. 12, 2024, 3:26 a.m. UTC | #1
On 12/11/2024 3:41 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> All other submodules pass arguments directly. Drop struct
> msm_dp_panel_in that is used to wrap dp_panel's submodule args and pass
> all data to msm_dp_panel_get() directly.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c |  9 +--------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c   | 15 ++++++++-------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h   | 10 ++--------
>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 

Change not necessarily tied to catalog cleanup, and can be sent 
independently IMO.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index cb02d5d5b404925707c737ed75e9e83fbec34f83..a2cdcdac042d63a59ff71aefcecb7f8b22f01167 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -722,9 +722,6 @@ static int msm_dp_init_sub_modules(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
>   {
>   	int rc = 0;
>   	struct device *dev = &dp->msm_dp_display.pdev->dev;
> -	struct msm_dp_panel_in panel_in = {
> -		.dev = dev,
> -	};
>   	struct phy *phy;
>   
>   	phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "dp");
> @@ -765,11 +762,7 @@ static int msm_dp_init_sub_modules(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
>   		goto error_link;
>   	}
>   
> -	panel_in.aux = dp->aux;
> -	panel_in.catalog = dp->catalog;
> -	panel_in.link = dp->link;
> -
> -	dp->panel = msm_dp_panel_get(&panel_in);
> +	dp->panel = msm_dp_panel_get(dev, dp->aux, dp->link, dp->catalog);
>   	if (IS_ERR(dp->panel)) {
>   		rc = PTR_ERR(dp->panel);
>   		DRM_ERROR("failed to initialize panel, rc = %d\n", rc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
> index 25869e2ac93aba0bffeddae9f95917d81870d8cb..49bbcde8cf60ac1b297310a50191135d79b092fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
> @@ -659,25 +659,26 @@ static int msm_dp_panel_parse_dt(struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct msm_dp_panel_in *in)
> +struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct device *dev, struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> +			      struct msm_dp_link *link, struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog)
>   {

so this API, takes a filled input panel, makes a msm_dp_panel out of it 
by filling out more information on top of what was already passed in and 
returns a msm_dp_panel.

So IOW, converts a msm_dp_panel_in to msm_dp_panel.

What is the gain by passing individual params rather than passing them 
as a struct instead? Isnt it better to have it within that struct to 
show the conversion and moreover we dont have to pass in 4 arguments 
instead of 1.


>   	struct msm_dp_panel_private *panel;
>   	struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	if (!in->dev || !in->catalog || !in->aux || !in->link) {
> +	if (!dev || !catalog || !aux || !link) {
>   		DRM_ERROR("invalid input\n");
>   		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>   	}
>   
> -	panel = devm_kzalloc(in->dev, sizeof(*panel), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	panel = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*panel), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!panel)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>   
> -	panel->dev = in->dev;
> -	panel->aux = in->aux;
> -	panel->catalog = in->catalog;
> -	panel->link = in->link;
> +	panel->dev = dev;
> +	panel->aux = aux;
> +	panel->catalog = catalog;
> +	panel->link = link;
>   
>   	msm_dp_panel = &panel->msm_dp_panel;
>   	msm_dp_panel->max_bw_code = DP_LINK_BW_8_1;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h
> index f305b1151118b53762368905b70d951a366ba1a8..a4719a3bbbddd18304227a006e82a5ce9ad7bbf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h
> @@ -21,13 +21,6 @@ struct msm_dp_display_mode {
>   	bool out_fmt_is_yuv_420;
>   };
>   
> -struct msm_dp_panel_in {
> -	struct device *dev;
> -	struct drm_dp_aux *aux;
> -	struct msm_dp_link *link;
> -	struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog;
> -};
> -
>   struct msm_dp_panel_psr {
>   	u8 version;
>   	u8 capabilities;
> @@ -94,6 +87,7 @@ static inline bool is_lane_count_valid(u32 lane_count)
>   		lane_count == 4);
>   }
>   
> -struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct msm_dp_panel_in *in);
> +struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct device *dev, struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> +			      struct msm_dp_link *link, struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog);
>   void msm_dp_panel_put(struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel);
>   #endif /* _DP_PANEL_H_ */
>
Dmitry Baryshkov Dec. 12, 2024, 8:53 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 05:26, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/11/2024 3:41 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > All other submodules pass arguments directly. Drop struct
> > msm_dp_panel_in that is used to wrap dp_panel's submodule args and pass
> > all data to msm_dp_panel_get() directly.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c |  9 +--------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c   | 15 ++++++++-------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h   | 10 ++--------
> >   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Change not necessarily tied to catalog cleanup, and can be sent
> independently IMO.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > index cb02d5d5b404925707c737ed75e9e83fbec34f83..a2cdcdac042d63a59ff71aefcecb7f8b22f01167 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > @@ -722,9 +722,6 @@ static int msm_dp_init_sub_modules(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
> >   {
> >       int rc = 0;
> >       struct device *dev = &dp->msm_dp_display.pdev->dev;
> > -     struct msm_dp_panel_in panel_in = {
> > -             .dev = dev,
> > -     };
> >       struct phy *phy;
> >
> >       phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "dp");
> > @@ -765,11 +762,7 @@ static int msm_dp_init_sub_modules(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
> >               goto error_link;
> >       }
> >
> > -     panel_in.aux = dp->aux;
> > -     panel_in.catalog = dp->catalog;
> > -     panel_in.link = dp->link;
> > -
> > -     dp->panel = msm_dp_panel_get(&panel_in);
> > +     dp->panel = msm_dp_panel_get(dev, dp->aux, dp->link, dp->catalog);
> >       if (IS_ERR(dp->panel)) {
> >               rc = PTR_ERR(dp->panel);
> >               DRM_ERROR("failed to initialize panel, rc = %d\n", rc);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
> > index 25869e2ac93aba0bffeddae9f95917d81870d8cb..49bbcde8cf60ac1b297310a50191135d79b092fb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
> > @@ -659,25 +659,26 @@ static int msm_dp_panel_parse_dt(struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel)
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > -struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct msm_dp_panel_in *in)
> > +struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct device *dev, struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> > +                           struct msm_dp_link *link, struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog)
> >   {
>
> so this API, takes a filled input panel, makes a msm_dp_panel out of it
> by filling out more information on top of what was already passed in and
> returns a msm_dp_panel.
>
> So IOW, converts a msm_dp_panel_in to msm_dp_panel.
>
> What is the gain by passing individual params rather than passing them
> as a struct instead? Isnt it better to have it within that struct to
> show the conversion and moreover we dont have to pass in 4 arguments
> instead of 1.

We gain uniformity. All other modules use params. And, as pointed out
by Maxime during HDMI Codec reviews, it's easier to handle function
params - it makes it more obvious that one of the params got missing.
Abhinav Kumar Dec. 12, 2024, 6:56 p.m. UTC | #3
On 12/12/2024 12:53 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 05:26, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/11/2024 3:41 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> All other submodules pass arguments directly. Drop struct
>>> msm_dp_panel_in that is used to wrap dp_panel's submodule args and pass
>>> all data to msm_dp_panel_get() directly.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c |  9 +--------
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c   | 15 ++++++++-------
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h   | 10 ++--------
>>>    3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Change not necessarily tied to catalog cleanup, and can be sent
>> independently IMO.
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>> index cb02d5d5b404925707c737ed75e9e83fbec34f83..a2cdcdac042d63a59ff71aefcecb7f8b22f01167 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>> @@ -722,9 +722,6 @@ static int msm_dp_init_sub_modules(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
>>>    {
>>>        int rc = 0;
>>>        struct device *dev = &dp->msm_dp_display.pdev->dev;
>>> -     struct msm_dp_panel_in panel_in = {
>>> -             .dev = dev,
>>> -     };
>>>        struct phy *phy;
>>>
>>>        phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "dp");
>>> @@ -765,11 +762,7 @@ static int msm_dp_init_sub_modules(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
>>>                goto error_link;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> -     panel_in.aux = dp->aux;
>>> -     panel_in.catalog = dp->catalog;
>>> -     panel_in.link = dp->link;
>>> -
>>> -     dp->panel = msm_dp_panel_get(&panel_in);
>>> +     dp->panel = msm_dp_panel_get(dev, dp->aux, dp->link, dp->catalog);
>>>        if (IS_ERR(dp->panel)) {
>>>                rc = PTR_ERR(dp->panel);
>>>                DRM_ERROR("failed to initialize panel, rc = %d\n", rc);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
>>> index 25869e2ac93aba0bffeddae9f95917d81870d8cb..49bbcde8cf60ac1b297310a50191135d79b092fb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
>>> @@ -659,25 +659,26 @@ static int msm_dp_panel_parse_dt(struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel)
>>>        return 0;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> -struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct msm_dp_panel_in *in)
>>> +struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct device *dev, struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>>> +                           struct msm_dp_link *link, struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog)
>>>    {
>>
>> so this API, takes a filled input panel, makes a msm_dp_panel out of it
>> by filling out more information on top of what was already passed in and
>> returns a msm_dp_panel.
>>
>> So IOW, converts a msm_dp_panel_in to msm_dp_panel.
>>
>> What is the gain by passing individual params rather than passing them
>> as a struct instead? Isnt it better to have it within that struct to
>> show the conversion and moreover we dont have to pass in 4 arguments
>> instead of 1.
> 
> We gain uniformity. All other modules use params. And, as pointed out
> by Maxime during HDMI Codec reviews, it's easier to handle function
> params - it makes it more obvious that one of the params got missing.
> 

Point noted but a very long param list also makes it harder to manage. 
So we should really evaluate on a case-by-case basis and not generalize 
here.

Here its only 4, so i would say its kindof okay. If it goes beyond it, 
then msm_dp_panel_in is probably going to come back.

Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
index cb02d5d5b404925707c737ed75e9e83fbec34f83..a2cdcdac042d63a59ff71aefcecb7f8b22f01167 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
@@ -722,9 +722,6 @@  static int msm_dp_init_sub_modules(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
 {
 	int rc = 0;
 	struct device *dev = &dp->msm_dp_display.pdev->dev;
-	struct msm_dp_panel_in panel_in = {
-		.dev = dev,
-	};
 	struct phy *phy;
 
 	phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "dp");
@@ -765,11 +762,7 @@  static int msm_dp_init_sub_modules(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
 		goto error_link;
 	}
 
-	panel_in.aux = dp->aux;
-	panel_in.catalog = dp->catalog;
-	panel_in.link = dp->link;
-
-	dp->panel = msm_dp_panel_get(&panel_in);
+	dp->panel = msm_dp_panel_get(dev, dp->aux, dp->link, dp->catalog);
 	if (IS_ERR(dp->panel)) {
 		rc = PTR_ERR(dp->panel);
 		DRM_ERROR("failed to initialize panel, rc = %d\n", rc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
index 25869e2ac93aba0bffeddae9f95917d81870d8cb..49bbcde8cf60ac1b297310a50191135d79b092fb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
@@ -659,25 +659,26 @@  static int msm_dp_panel_parse_dt(struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct msm_dp_panel_in *in)
+struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct device *dev, struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
+			      struct msm_dp_link *link, struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog)
 {
 	struct msm_dp_panel_private *panel;
 	struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!in->dev || !in->catalog || !in->aux || !in->link) {
+	if (!dev || !catalog || !aux || !link) {
 		DRM_ERROR("invalid input\n");
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
-	panel = devm_kzalloc(in->dev, sizeof(*panel), GFP_KERNEL);
+	panel = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*panel), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!panel)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	panel->dev = in->dev;
-	panel->aux = in->aux;
-	panel->catalog = in->catalog;
-	panel->link = in->link;
+	panel->dev = dev;
+	panel->aux = aux;
+	panel->catalog = catalog;
+	panel->link = link;
 
 	msm_dp_panel = &panel->msm_dp_panel;
 	msm_dp_panel->max_bw_code = DP_LINK_BW_8_1;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h
index f305b1151118b53762368905b70d951a366ba1a8..a4719a3bbbddd18304227a006e82a5ce9ad7bbf3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h
@@ -21,13 +21,6 @@  struct msm_dp_display_mode {
 	bool out_fmt_is_yuv_420;
 };
 
-struct msm_dp_panel_in {
-	struct device *dev;
-	struct drm_dp_aux *aux;
-	struct msm_dp_link *link;
-	struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog;
-};
-
 struct msm_dp_panel_psr {
 	u8 version;
 	u8 capabilities;
@@ -94,6 +87,7 @@  static inline bool is_lane_count_valid(u32 lane_count)
 		lane_count == 4);
 }
 
-struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct msm_dp_panel_in *in);
+struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel_get(struct device *dev, struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
+			      struct msm_dp_link *link, struct msm_dp_catalog *catalog);
 void msm_dp_panel_put(struct msm_dp_panel *msm_dp_panel);
 #endif /* _DP_PANEL_H_ */