diff mbox series

[v4,10/16] drm/msm/dpu: handle pipes as array

Message ID 20250116-sm8650-v6-13-hmd-deckard-mdss-quad-upstream-33-v4-10-74749c6eba33@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series drm/msm/dpu: Support quad pipe with dual-DSI | expand

Commit Message

Jun Nie Jan. 16, 2025, 7:25 a.m. UTC
Store pipes in array with removing dedicated r_pipe. There are
2 pipes in a drm plane at most currently, while 4 pipes are
required for quad-pipe case. Generalize the handling to pipe pair
and ease handling to another pipe pair later.

Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c  |  35 +++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h |  12 +--
 3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)

Comments

Dmitry Baryshkov Jan. 16, 2025, 8 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 03:25:59PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> Store pipes in array with removing dedicated r_pipe. There are
> 2 pipes in a drm plane at most currently, while 4 pipes are
> required for quad-pipe case. Generalize the handling to pipe pair
> and ease handling to another pipe pair later.

With the first sentence being moved to the end of the commit message:

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

Minor issues below, please address them in the next version.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c  |  35 +++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h |  12 +--
>  3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)

> @@ -853,6 +855,9 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* move the assignment here, to ease handling to another pairs later */

Is it a TODO comment? It reads like an order.

> +	pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
> +	r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
>  	/* state->src is 16.16, src_rect is not */
>  	drm_rect_fp_to_int(&pipe_cfg->src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
>  

> @@ -1387,17 +1394,28 @@ static void _dpu_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane)
>  {
>  	struct drm_plane_state *state = plane->state;
>  	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(state);
> -	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
> +	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe;
> +	int i;
>  
> -	trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
> -				pstate->pipe.multirect_mode);
> +	for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i += 1) {
> +		pipe = &pstate->pipe[i];
> +		if (!pipe->sspp)
> +			continue;
>  
> -	if (r_pipe->sspp) {
> -		r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> -		r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> +		trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
> +					pstate->pipe[i].multirect_mode);
>  
> -		if (r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
> -			r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(r_pipe);
> +		/*
> +		 * clear multirect for the right pipe so that the SSPP
> +		 * can be further reused in the solo mode
> +		 */
> +		if (pipe->sspp && i == 1) {

Wouldn't it be better to `&& i % 2 != 0`? Then, I think, this condition
can stay even in quad-pipe case.

> +			pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> +			pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> +
> +			if (pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
> +				pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(pipe);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	pstate->pending = true;
Jun Nie Jan. 16, 2025, 9:49 a.m. UTC | #2
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> 于2025年1月16日周四 16:00写道:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 03:25:59PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > Store pipes in array with removing dedicated r_pipe. There are
> > 2 pipes in a drm plane at most currently, while 4 pipes are
> > required for quad-pipe case. Generalize the handling to pipe pair
> > and ease handling to another pipe pair later.
>
> With the first sentence being moved to the end of the commit message:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>
> Minor issues below, please address them in the next version.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c  |  35 +++----
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h |  12 +--
> >  3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
>
> > @@ -853,6 +855,9 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
> >               return -EINVAL;
> >       }
> >
> > +     /* move the assignment here, to ease handling to another pairs later */
>
> Is it a TODO comment? It reads like an order.
>
> > +     pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
> > +     r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
> >       /* state->src is 16.16, src_rect is not */
> >       drm_rect_fp_to_int(&pipe_cfg->src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
> >
>
> > @@ -1387,17 +1394,28 @@ static void _dpu_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane)
> >  {
> >       struct drm_plane_state *state = plane->state;
> >       struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(state);
> > -     struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
> > +     struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe;
> > +     int i;
> >
> > -     trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
> > -                             pstate->pipe.multirect_mode);
> > +     for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i += 1) {
> > +             pipe = &pstate->pipe[i];
> > +             if (!pipe->sspp)
> > +                     continue;
> >
> > -     if (r_pipe->sspp) {
> > -             r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> > -             r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> > +             trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
> > +                                     pstate->pipe[i].multirect_mode);
> >
> > -             if (r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
> > -                     r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(r_pipe);
> > +             /*
> > +              * clear multirect for the right pipe so that the SSPP
> > +              * can be further reused in the solo mode
> > +              */
> > +             if (pipe->sspp && i == 1) {
>
> Wouldn't it be better to `&& i % 2 != 0`? Then, I think, this condition
> can stay even in quad-pipe case.

If all pipes are in solo mode, there is no need to test ' i %2 != 0 '. Below
test shall be better, right?
if (pipe->sspp && pipe->multirect_index == DPU_SSPP_RECT_1)

>
> > +                     pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> > +                     pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> > +
> > +                     if (pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
> > +                             pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(pipe);
> > +             }
> >       }
> >
> >       pstate->pending = true;
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Jun Nie Jan. 16, 2025, 9:51 a.m. UTC | #3
Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> 于2025年1月16日周四 17:49写道:
>
> Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> 于2025年1月16日周四 16:00写道:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 03:25:59PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > > Store pipes in array with removing dedicated r_pipe. There are
> > > 2 pipes in a drm plane at most currently, while 4 pipes are
> > > required for quad-pipe case. Generalize the handling to pipe pair
> > > and ease handling to another pipe pair later.
> >
> > With the first sentence being moved to the end of the commit message:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> >
> > Minor issues below, please address them in the next version.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c  |  35 +++----
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h |  12 +--
> > >  3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
> >
> > > @@ -853,6 +855,9 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > >               return -EINVAL;
> > >       }
> > >
> > > +     /* move the assignment here, to ease handling to another pairs later */
> >
> > Is it a TODO comment? It reads like an order.
> >
> > > +     pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
> > > +     r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
> > >       /* state->src is 16.16, src_rect is not */
> > >       drm_rect_fp_to_int(&pipe_cfg->src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
> > >
> >
> > > @@ -1387,17 +1394,28 @@ static void _dpu_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane)
> > >  {
> > >       struct drm_plane_state *state = plane->state;
> > >       struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(state);
> > > -     struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
> > > +     struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe;
> > > +     int i;
> > >
> > > -     trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
> > > -                             pstate->pipe.multirect_mode);
> > > +     for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i += 1) {
> > > +             pipe = &pstate->pipe[i];
> > > +             if (!pipe->sspp)
> > > +                     continue;
> > >
> > > -     if (r_pipe->sspp) {
> > > -             r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> > > -             r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> > > +             trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
> > > +                                     pstate->pipe[i].multirect_mode);
> > >
> > > -             if (r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
> > > -                     r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(r_pipe);
> > > +             /*
> > > +              * clear multirect for the right pipe so that the SSPP
> > > +              * can be further reused in the solo mode
> > > +              */
> > > +             if (pipe->sspp && i == 1) {
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to `&& i % 2 != 0`? Then, I think, this condition
> > can stay even in quad-pipe case.
>
> If all pipes are in solo mode, there is no need to test ' i %2 != 0 '. Below
> test shall be better, right?
> if (pipe->sspp && pipe->multirect_index == DPU_SSPP_RECT_1)

See your comments for later patch. Let's keep it as:
i % PIPES_PER_STAGE != 0
>
> >
> > > +                     pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> > > +                     pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> > > +
> > > +                     if (pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
> > > +                             pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(pipe);
> > > +             }
> > >       }
> > >
> > >       pstate->pending = true;
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
Dmitry Baryshkov Jan. 16, 2025, 10:08 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:49:43PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> 于2025年1月16日周四 16:00写道:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 03:25:59PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > > Store pipes in array with removing dedicated r_pipe. There are
> > > 2 pipes in a drm plane at most currently, while 4 pipes are
> > > required for quad-pipe case. Generalize the handling to pipe pair
> > > and ease handling to another pipe pair later.
> >
> > With the first sentence being moved to the end of the commit message:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> >
> > Minor issues below, please address them in the next version.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c  |  35 +++----
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h |  12 +--
> > >  3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
> >
> > > @@ -853,6 +855,9 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > >               return -EINVAL;
> > >       }
> > >
> > > +     /* move the assignment here, to ease handling to another pairs later */
> >
> > Is it a TODO comment? It reads like an order.
> >
> > > +     pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
> > > +     r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
> > >       /* state->src is 16.16, src_rect is not */
> > >       drm_rect_fp_to_int(&pipe_cfg->src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
> > >
> >
> > > @@ -1387,17 +1394,28 @@ static void _dpu_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane)
> > >  {
> > >       struct drm_plane_state *state = plane->state;
> > >       struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(state);
> > > -     struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
> > > +     struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe;
> > > +     int i;
> > >
> > > -     trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
> > > -                             pstate->pipe.multirect_mode);
> > > +     for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i += 1) {
> > > +             pipe = &pstate->pipe[i];
> > > +             if (!pipe->sspp)
> > > +                     continue;
> > >
> > > -     if (r_pipe->sspp) {
> > > -             r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> > > -             r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> > > +             trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
> > > +                                     pstate->pipe[i].multirect_mode);
> > >
> > > -             if (r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
> > > -                     r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(r_pipe);
> > > +             /*
> > > +              * clear multirect for the right pipe so that the SSPP
> > > +              * can be further reused in the solo mode
> > > +              */
> > > +             if (pipe->sspp && i == 1) {
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to `&& i % 2 != 0`? Then, I think, this condition
> > can stay even in quad-pipe case.
> 
> If all pipes are in solo mode, there is no need to test ' i %2 != 0 '. Below
> test shall be better, right?
> if (pipe->sspp && pipe->multirect_index == DPU_SSPP_RECT_1)

Again, this will not work as expected for the SSPP-sharing case as it
will then clear pipe 0 for the sharing planes.

Let me think a bit... This code resets multirect for right pipes. It was
added back in 4.9 to fix the case of 'master' aka RECT_0 not being a
part of the atomic update. However I don't think this is applicable
anymore. We use z_pos normalization, so all planes for a CRTC are added
to the commit. Please drop this piece in a separate commit.

> 
> >
> > > +                     pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> > > +                     pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> > > +
> > > +                     if (pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
> > > +                             pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(pipe);
> > > +             }
> > >       }
> > >
> > >       pstate->pending = true;
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
index 05abe2d05d8d8..193818b02197d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@  static void _dpu_crtc_blend_setup_mixer(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 	const struct msm_format *format;
 	struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctl = mixer->lm_ctl;
 
-	uint32_t lm_idx;
+	uint32_t lm_idx, i;
 	bool bg_alpha_enable = false;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(fetch_active, SSPP_MAX);
 
@@ -463,20 +463,15 @@  static void _dpu_crtc_blend_setup_mixer(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 		if (pstate->stage == DPU_STAGE_BASE && format->alpha_enable)
 			bg_alpha_enable = true;
 
-		set_bit(pstate->pipe.sspp->idx, fetch_active);
-		_dpu_crtc_blend_setup_pipe(crtc, plane,
-					   mixer, cstate->num_mixers,
-					   pstate->stage,
-					   format, fb ? fb->modifier : 0,
-					   &pstate->pipe, 0, stage_cfg);
-
-		if (pstate->r_pipe.sspp) {
-			set_bit(pstate->r_pipe.sspp->idx, fetch_active);
+		for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++) {
+			if (!pstate->pipe[i].sspp)
+				continue;
+			set_bit(pstate->pipe[i].sspp->idx, fetch_active);
 			_dpu_crtc_blend_setup_pipe(crtc, plane,
 						   mixer, cstate->num_mixers,
 						   pstate->stage,
 						   format, fb ? fb->modifier : 0,
-						   &pstate->r_pipe, 1, stage_cfg);
+						   &pstate->pipe[i], i, stage_cfg);
 		}
 
 		/* blend config update */
@@ -1440,15 +1435,15 @@  static int _dpu_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
 		seq_printf(s, "\tdst x:%4d dst_y:%4d dst_w:%4d dst_h:%4d\n",
 			state->crtc_x, state->crtc_y, state->crtc_w,
 			state->crtc_h);
-		seq_printf(s, "\tsspp[0]:%s\n",
-			   pstate->pipe.sspp->cap->name);
-		seq_printf(s, "\tmultirect[0]: mode: %d index: %d\n",
-			pstate->pipe.multirect_mode, pstate->pipe.multirect_index);
-		if (pstate->r_pipe.sspp) {
-			seq_printf(s, "\tsspp[1]:%s\n",
-				   pstate->r_pipe.sspp->cap->name);
-			seq_printf(s, "\tmultirect[1]: mode: %d index: %d\n",
-				   pstate->r_pipe.multirect_mode, pstate->r_pipe.multirect_index);
+
+		for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++) {
+			if (!pstate->pipe[i].sspp)
+				continue;
+			seq_printf(s, "\tsspp[%d]:%s\n",
+				   i, pstate->pipe[i].sspp->cap->name);
+			seq_printf(s, "\tmultirect[%d]: mode: %d index: %d\n",
+				   i, pstate->pipe[i].multirect_mode,
+				   pstate->pipe[i].multirect_index);
 		}
 
 		seq_puts(s, "\n");
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
index 2b75a6cf4e670..1adbf91be850f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
@@ -619,6 +619,7 @@  static void _dpu_plane_color_fill(struct dpu_plane *pdpu,
 	struct msm_drm_private *priv = plane->dev->dev_private;
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(plane->state);
 	u32 fill_color = (color & 0xFFFFFF) | ((alpha & 0xFF) << 24);
+	int i;
 
 	DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "\n");
 
@@ -632,12 +633,13 @@  static void _dpu_plane_color_fill(struct dpu_plane *pdpu,
 		return;
 
 	/* update sspp */
-	_dpu_plane_color_fill_pipe(pstate, &pstate->pipe, &pstate->pipe_cfg.dst_rect,
-				   fill_color, fmt);
-
-	if (pstate->r_pipe.sspp)
-		_dpu_plane_color_fill_pipe(pstate, &pstate->r_pipe, &pstate->r_pipe_cfg.dst_rect,
+	for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++) {
+		if (!pstate->pipe[i].sspp)
+			continue;
+		_dpu_plane_color_fill_pipe(pstate, &pstate->pipe[i],
+					   &pstate->pipe_cfg[i].dst_rect,
 					   fill_color, fmt);
+	}
 }
 
 static int dpu_plane_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
@@ -827,8 +829,8 @@  static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 	struct dpu_kms *kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(&pdpu->base);
 	u64 max_mdp_clk_rate = kms->perf.max_core_clk_rate;
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->r_pipe_cfg;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg;
 	struct drm_rect fb_rect = { 0 };
 	uint32_t max_linewidth;
 
@@ -853,6 +855,9 @@  static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/* move the assignment here, to ease handling to another pairs later */
+	pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
+	r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
 	/* state->src is 16.16, src_rect is not */
 	drm_rect_fp_to_int(&pipe_cfg->src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
 
@@ -949,10 +954,10 @@  static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_sspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 		drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state(state, plane);
 	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->r_pipe_cfg;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe[0];
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->pipe[1];
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, pipe, pipe_cfg,
@@ -1011,10 +1016,10 @@  static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
 	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
 	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(plane);
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->r_pipe_cfg;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe[0];
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->pipe[1];
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
 	const struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = NULL;
 	uint32_t max_linewidth = dpu_kms->catalog->caps->max_linewidth;
 
@@ -1058,7 +1063,7 @@  static int dpu_plane_virtual_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
 		drm_atomic_get_old_plane_state(state, plane);
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(plane_state);
 	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
-	int ret;
+	int ret, i;
 
 	if (plane_state->crtc)
 		crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
@@ -1073,8 +1078,8 @@  static int dpu_plane_virtual_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
 		 * resources are freed by dpu_crtc_assign_plane_resources(),
 		 * but clean them here.
 		 */
-		pstate->pipe.sspp = NULL;
-		pstate->r_pipe.sspp = NULL;
+		for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++)
+			pstate->pipe[i].sspp = NULL;
 
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -1111,19 +1116,21 @@  static int dpu_plane_virtual_assign_resources(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg;
 	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg;
 	const struct msm_format *fmt;
+	int i;
 
 	if (plane_state->crtc)
 		crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
 							   plane_state->crtc);
 
 	pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(plane_state);
-	pipe = &pstate->pipe;
-	r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
-	pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg;
-	r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->r_pipe_cfg;
 
-	pipe->sspp = NULL;
-	r_pipe->sspp = NULL;
+	pipe = &pstate->pipe[0];
+	r_pipe = &pstate->pipe[1];
+	pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
+	r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
+
+	for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++)
+		pstate->pipe[i].sspp = NULL;
 
 	if (!plane_state->fb)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1213,6 +1220,7 @@  void dpu_plane_flush(struct drm_plane *plane)
 {
 	struct dpu_plane *pdpu;
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate;
+	int i;
 
 	if (!plane || !plane->state) {
 		DPU_ERROR("invalid plane\n");
@@ -1233,8 +1241,8 @@  void dpu_plane_flush(struct drm_plane *plane)
 		/* force 100% alpha */
 		_dpu_plane_color_fill(pdpu, pdpu->color_fill, 0xFF);
 	else {
-		dpu_plane_flush_csc(pdpu, &pstate->pipe);
-		dpu_plane_flush_csc(pdpu, &pstate->r_pipe);
+		for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++)
+			dpu_plane_flush_csc(pdpu, &pstate->pipe[i]);
 	}
 
 	/* flag h/w flush complete */
@@ -1335,15 +1343,12 @@  static void dpu_plane_sspp_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
 	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
 	struct drm_plane_state *state = plane->state;
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(state);
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
 	struct drm_crtc *crtc = state->crtc;
 	struct drm_framebuffer *fb = state->fb;
 	bool is_rt_pipe;
 	const struct msm_format *fmt =
 		msm_framebuffer_format(fb);
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->r_pipe_cfg;
+	int i;
 
 	pstate->pending = true;
 
@@ -1358,12 +1363,12 @@  static void dpu_plane_sspp_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
 			crtc->base.id, DRM_RECT_ARG(&state->dst),
 			&fmt->pixel_format, MSM_FORMAT_IS_UBWC(fmt));
 
-	dpu_plane_sspp_update_pipe(plane, pipe, pipe_cfg, fmt,
-				   drm_mode_vrefresh(&crtc->mode),
-				   &pstate->layout);
-
-	if (r_pipe->sspp) {
-		dpu_plane_sspp_update_pipe(plane, r_pipe, r_pipe_cfg, fmt,
+	/* move the assignment here, to ease handling to another pairs later */
+	for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++) {
+		if (!pstate->pipe[i].sspp)
+			continue;
+		dpu_plane_sspp_update_pipe(plane, &pstate->pipe[i],
+					   &pstate->pipe_cfg[i], fmt,
 					   drm_mode_vrefresh(&crtc->mode),
 					   &pstate->layout);
 	}
@@ -1371,15 +1376,17 @@  static void dpu_plane_sspp_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
 	if (pstate->needs_qos_remap)
 		pstate->needs_qos_remap = false;
 
-	pstate->plane_fetch_bw = _dpu_plane_calc_bw(pdpu->catalog, fmt,
-						    &crtc->mode, pipe_cfg);
-
-	pstate->plane_clk = _dpu_plane_calc_clk(&crtc->mode, pipe_cfg);
-
-	if (r_pipe->sspp) {
-		pstate->plane_fetch_bw += _dpu_plane_calc_bw(pdpu->catalog, fmt, &crtc->mode, r_pipe_cfg);
+	pstate->plane_fetch_bw = 0;
+	pstate->plane_clk = 0;
+	for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++) {
+		if (!pstate->pipe[i].sspp)
+			continue;
+		pstate->plane_fetch_bw += _dpu_plane_calc_bw(pdpu->catalog, fmt,
+							     &crtc->mode, &pstate->pipe_cfg[i]);
 
-		pstate->plane_clk = max(pstate->plane_clk, _dpu_plane_calc_clk(&crtc->mode, r_pipe_cfg));
+		pstate->plane_clk = max(pstate->plane_clk,
+					_dpu_plane_calc_clk(&crtc->mode,
+							    &pstate->pipe_cfg[i]));
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1387,17 +1394,28 @@  static void _dpu_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane)
 {
 	struct drm_plane_state *state = plane->state;
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(state);
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe;
+	int i;
 
-	trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
-				pstate->pipe.multirect_mode);
+	for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i += 1) {
+		pipe = &pstate->pipe[i];
+		if (!pipe->sspp)
+			continue;
 
-	if (r_pipe->sspp) {
-		r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
-		r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
+		trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
+					pstate->pipe[i].multirect_mode);
 
-		if (r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
-			r_pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(r_pipe);
+		/*
+		 * clear multirect for the right pipe so that the SSPP
+		 * can be further reused in the solo mode
+		 */
+		if (pipe->sspp && i == 1) {
+			pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
+			pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
+
+			if (pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect)
+				pipe->sspp->ops.setup_multirect(pipe);
+		}
 	}
 
 	pstate->pending = true;
@@ -1492,28 +1510,26 @@  static void dpu_plane_atomic_print_state(struct drm_printer *p,
 		const struct drm_plane_state *state)
 {
 	const struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(state);
-	const struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe;
-	const struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg;
-	const struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
-	const struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->r_pipe_cfg;
+	const struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe;
+	const struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg;
+	int i;
 
 	drm_printf(p, "\tstage=%d\n", pstate->stage);
 
-	drm_printf(p, "\tsspp[0]=%s\n", pipe->sspp->cap->name);
-	drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_mode[0]=%s\n", dpu_get_multirect_mode(pipe->multirect_mode));
-	drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_index[0]=%s\n",
-		   dpu_get_multirect_index(pipe->multirect_index));
-	drm_printf(p, "\tsrc[0]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect));
-	drm_printf(p, "\tdst[0]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->dst_rect));
-
-	if (r_pipe->sspp) {
-		drm_printf(p, "\tsspp[1]=%s\n", r_pipe->sspp->cap->name);
-		drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_mode[1]=%s\n",
-			   dpu_get_multirect_mode(r_pipe->multirect_mode));
-		drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_index[1]=%s\n",
-			   dpu_get_multirect_index(r_pipe->multirect_index));
-		drm_printf(p, "\tsrc[1]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", DRM_RECT_ARG(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect));
-		drm_printf(p, "\tdst[1]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", DRM_RECT_ARG(&r_pipe_cfg->dst_rect));
+	for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++) {
+		pipe = &pstate->pipe[i];
+		if (!pipe->sspp)
+			continue;
+		pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[i];
+		drm_printf(p, "\tsspp[%d]=%s\n", i, pipe->sspp->cap->name);
+		drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_mode[%d]=%s\n", i,
+			   dpu_get_multirect_mode(pipe->multirect_mode));
+		drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_index[%d]=%s\n", i,
+			   dpu_get_multirect_index(pipe->multirect_index));
+		drm_printf(p, "\tsrc[%d]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", i,
+			   DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect));
+		drm_printf(p, "\tdst[%d]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", i,
+			   DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->dst_rect));
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1551,14 +1567,17 @@  void dpu_plane_danger_signal_ctrl(struct drm_plane *plane, bool enable)
 	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(plane->state);
 	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(plane);
+	int i;
 
 	if (!pdpu->is_rt_pipe)
 		return;
 
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
-	_dpu_plane_set_qos_ctrl(plane, &pstate->pipe, enable);
-	if (pstate->r_pipe.sspp)
-		_dpu_plane_set_qos_ctrl(plane, &pstate->r_pipe, enable);
+	for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++) {
+		if (!pstate->pipe[i].sspp)
+			continue;
+		_dpu_plane_set_qos_ctrl(plane, &pstate->pipe[i], enable);
+	}
 	pm_runtime_put_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
 }
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h
index acd5725175cdd..052fd046e8463 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h
@@ -18,10 +18,8 @@ 
  * struct dpu_plane_state: Define dpu extension of drm plane state object
  * @base:	base drm plane state object
  * @aspace:	pointer to address space for input/output buffers
- * @pipe:	software pipe description
- * @r_pipe:	software pipe description of the second pipe
- * @pipe_cfg:	software pipe configuration
- * @r_pipe_cfg:	software pipe configuration for the second pipe
+ * @pipe:	software pipe description array
+ * @pipe_cfg:	software pipe configuration array
  * @stage:	assigned by crtc blender
  * @needs_qos_remap: qos remap settings need to be updated
  * @multirect_index: index of the rectangle of SSPP
@@ -35,10 +33,8 @@ 
 struct dpu_plane_state {
 	struct drm_plane_state base;
 	struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe pipe;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe r_pipe;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg pipe_cfg;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg r_pipe_cfg;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe pipe[PIPES_PER_STAGE];
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg pipe_cfg[PIPES_PER_STAGE];
 	enum dpu_stage stage;
 	bool needs_qos_remap;
 	bool pending;