| Message ID | 2621741.YulfsnvZOh@wuerfel (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 03:39:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The hdlcd_pm_suspend and hdlcd_pm_resume are intentionally unused > when CONFIG_PM is not set in this driver, and we get a compiler warning > for this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c:521:12: warning: 'hdlcd_pm_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c:536:12: warning: 'hdlcd_pm_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > This adds a __maybe_unused annotation for the two functions, to let > the compiler know this is the intended behavior. This is better than > an #ifdef as it improves the compile time coverage of the code and it > looks nicer. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c index 31969efe97d4..6173bb835223 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id hdlcd_of_match[] = { }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, hdlcd_of_match); -static int hdlcd_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) +static int __maybe_unused hdlcd_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) { struct drm_device *drm = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct drm_crtc *crtc; @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static int hdlcd_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) return 0; } -static int hdlcd_pm_resume(struct device *dev) +static int __maybe_unused hdlcd_pm_resume(struct device *dev) { struct drm_device *drm = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct drm_crtc *crtc;
The hdlcd_pm_suspend and hdlcd_pm_resume are intentionally unused when CONFIG_PM is not set in this driver, and we get a compiler warning for this: drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c:521:12: warning: 'hdlcd_pm_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c:536:12: warning: 'hdlcd_pm_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] This adds a __maybe_unused annotation for the two functions, to let the compiler know this is the intended behavior. This is better than an #ifdef as it improves the compile time coverage of the code and it looks nicer. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>