| Message ID | 477dcfde0b9247c91030dedcbf71af7dafdb7bf4.1389018325.git.rashika.kheria@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> wrote: > Mark functions as static because they are not used outside the file > drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c. > > This eliminates the following warnings in drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c: > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:43:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_clip_cliprects’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:426:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_surface_destroy’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:592:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_surface_dirty’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:757:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_destroy’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:943:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_dirty’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:1666:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_du_update_layout’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) This and patch 83, 84, 85 are Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com> Cheers, Jakob.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:21:12AM +0100, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> wrote: > > Mark functions as static because they are not used outside the file > > drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c. > > > > This eliminates the following warnings in drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c: > > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:43:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_clip_cliprects’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:426:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_surface_destroy’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:592:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_surface_dirty’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:757:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_destroy’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:943:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_dirty’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:1666:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_du_update_layout’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > > > Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 12 ++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > This and patch 83, 84, 85 are > Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com> Can you take them through your tree, or are you expecting them to follow another path? - Josh Triplett
On 01/07/2014 11:51 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:21:12AM +0100, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Mark functions as static because they are not used outside the file >>> drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c. >>> >>> This eliminates the following warnings in drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c: >>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:43:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_clip_cliprects’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] >>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:426:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_surface_destroy’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] >>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:592:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_surface_dirty’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] >>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:757:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_destroy’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] >>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:943:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_dirty’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] >>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c:1666:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmw_du_update_layout’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 12 ++++++------ >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> This and patch 83, 84, 85 are >> Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com> > Can you take them through your tree, or are you expecting them to follow > another path? I'll take them through vmwgfx-next. However, patch 83/85 conflicts heavily with an internal vmwgfx patch series. If applicable, I'll apply it after resolving those conflicts. Thanks, /Thomas > > - Josh Triplett > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c index 03f1c20..6af4816 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct vmw_clip_rect { * Clip @num_rects number of @rects against @clip storing the * results in @out_rects and the number of passed rects in @out_num. */ -void vmw_clip_cliprects(struct drm_clip_rect *rects, +static void vmw_clip_cliprects(struct drm_clip_rect *rects, int num_rects, struct vmw_clip_rect clip, SVGASignedRect *out_rects, @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ struct vmw_framebuffer_surface { struct drm_master *master; }; -void vmw_framebuffer_surface_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *framebuffer) +static void vmw_framebuffer_surface_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *framebuffer) { struct vmw_framebuffer_surface *vfbs = vmw_framebuffer_to_vfbs(framebuffer); @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ out_free_tmp: return ret; } -int vmw_framebuffer_surface_dirty(struct drm_framebuffer *framebuffer, +static int vmw_framebuffer_surface_dirty(struct drm_framebuffer *framebuffer, struct drm_file *file_priv, unsigned flags, unsigned color, struct drm_clip_rect *clips, @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ struct vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf { struct vmw_dma_buffer *buffer; }; -void vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *framebuffer) +static void vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *framebuffer) { struct vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf *vfbd = vmw_framebuffer_to_vfbd(framebuffer); @@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ static int do_dmabuf_dirty_sou(struct drm_file *file_priv, return ret; } -int vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_dirty(struct drm_framebuffer *framebuffer, +static int vmw_framebuffer_dmabuf_dirty(struct drm_framebuffer *framebuffer, struct drm_file *file_priv, unsigned flags, unsigned color, struct drm_clip_rect *clips, @@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ void vmw_disable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc) * Small shared kms functions. */ -int vmw_du_update_layout(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, unsigned num, +static int vmw_du_update_layout(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, unsigned num, struct drm_vmw_rect *rects) { struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;