diff mbox

[Mesa-dev] drm/radeon: Add RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS BO creation flag

Message ID 540FCDAA.7040302@daenzer.net (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Michel Dänzer Sept. 10, 2014, 4:03 a.m. UTC
On 10.09.2014 01:28, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:
>> On 09.09.2014 09:47, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 09.09.2014 02:36, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Updated version with comments integrated.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> @@ -314,10 +314,12 @@ int radeon_bo_pin_restricted(struct radeon_bo
>>>> *bo, u32 domain, u64 max_offset,
>>>>           unsigned lpfn = 0;
>>>>
>>>>           /* force to pin into visible video ram */
>>>> -        if (bo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM)
>>>> -            lpfn = bo->rdev->mc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> -        else
>>>> +        if (bo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM) {
>>>> +            if (!(bo->flags & RADEON_GEM_NO_CPU_ACCESS))
>>>> +                lpfn = bo->rdev->mc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> +        } else {
>>>>               lpfn = bo->rdev->mc.gtt_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; /* ??? */
>>>> +        }
>>>
>>> The else block can be removed as well, but that can be done in another
>>> patch.
>>
>> Actually, I just noticed a problem, the following if statement:
>>
>>>                if (max_offset)
>>>                        lpfn = min (lpfn, (unsigned)(max_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT));
>>
>> This will ignore max_offset if lpfn is 0. So either go with v1 of this hunk,
>> or rebase on top of the patch below.
>>
>
> Rebased on your patch and attached.

My patch didn't handle max_offset == 0 correctly. Attaching a fixed v2 
patch and your patch rebased on top of that.

Comments

Alex Deucher Sept. 10, 2014, 1:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:
> On 10.09.2014 01:28, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09.09.2014 09:47, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 09.09.2014 02:36, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Updated version with comments integrated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -314,10 +314,12 @@ int radeon_bo_pin_restricted(struct radeon_bo
>>>>> *bo, u32 domain, u64 max_offset,
>>>>>           unsigned lpfn = 0;
>>>>>
>>>>>           /* force to pin into visible video ram */
>>>>> -        if (bo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM)
>>>>> -            lpfn = bo->rdev->mc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> -        else
>>>>> +        if (bo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM) {
>>>>> +            if (!(bo->flags & RADEON_GEM_NO_CPU_ACCESS))
>>>>> +                lpfn = bo->rdev->mc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> +        } else {
>>>>>               lpfn = bo->rdev->mc.gtt_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; /* ??? */
>>>>> +        }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The else block can be removed as well, but that can be done in another
>>>> patch.
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, I just noticed a problem, the following if statement:
>>>
>>>>                if (max_offset)
>>>>                        lpfn = min (lpfn, (unsigned)(max_offset >>
>>>> PAGE_SHIFT));
>>>
>>>
>>> This will ignore max_offset if lpfn is 0. So either go with v1 of this
>>> hunk,
>>> or rebase on top of the patch below.
>>>
>>
>> Rebased on your patch and attached.
>
>
> My patch didn't handle max_offset == 0 correctly. Attaching a fixed v2 patch
> and your patch rebased on top of that.

Applied.  thanks!

Alex
diff mbox

Patch

From 8e896486464526add633b6809b6d020ad810315c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:59:05 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/radeon: add RADEON_GEM_NO_CPU_ACCESS BO creation flag
 (v4)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Allows pinning of buffers in the non-CPU visible portion of
vram.

v2: incorporate Michel's comments.
v3: rebase on Michel's patch
v4: rebase on Michel's v2 patch

Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 1 +
 include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h          | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
index 24c8772..d3f0a19 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
@@ -309,6 +309,7 @@  int radeon_bo_pin_restricted(struct radeon_bo *bo, u32 domain, u64 max_offset,
 	for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++) {
 		/* force to pin into visible video ram */
 		if ((bo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM) &&
+		    !(bo->flags & RADEON_GEM_NO_CPU_ACCESS) &&
 		    (!max_offset || max_offset > bo->rdev->mc.visible_vram_size))
 			bo->placements[i].lpfn =
 				bo->rdev->mc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h
index bf0067b..017f869 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h
@@ -801,6 +801,8 @@  struct drm_radeon_gem_info {
 #define RADEON_GEM_GTT_WC		(1 << 2)
 /* BO is expected to be accessed by the CPU */
 #define RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS		(1 << 3)
+/* CPU access is not expected to work for this BO */
+#define RADEON_GEM_NO_CPU_ACCESS	(1 << 4)
 
 struct drm_radeon_gem_create {
 	uint64_t	size;
-- 
2.1.0