| Message ID | 55e14a941b1756b78c0f33a695c102520e42fcd9.1464207811.git.jsarha@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c index 1b3f974..522f5a2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c @@ -547,7 +547,8 @@ void intel_color_init(struct drm_crtc *crtc) /* Enable color management support when we have degamma & gamma LUTs. */ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->color.degamma_lut_size != 0 && INTEL_INFO(dev)->color.gamma_lut_size != 0) - drm_helper_crtc_enable_color_mgmt(crtc, + drm_crtc_enable_color_mgmt(crtc, INTEL_INFO(dev)->color.degamma_lut_size, + true, INTEL_INFO(dev)->color.gamma_lut_size); }
Use drm_crtc_enable_color_mgmt() in intel_color_init() instead of obsolete drm_helper_crtc_enable_color_mgmt(). Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com> CC: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> --- I have not tested this change, only compiled it, but functionally it should be the same. Probably it would make sense to get rid off the condition for calling drm_crtc_enable_color_mgmt() all together. drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)