diff mbox series

drm: panel-orientation-quirks: Get rid of superfluous (void *) casting

Message ID CAD4j4=DJsChZGovpUf4DYwB=R7Hag9srkzd3ihkEHUoO0rzSUA@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm: panel-orientation-quirks: Get rid of superfluous (void *) casting | expand

Commit Message

kernel test robot via dri-devel Feb. 13, 2019, 10:13 a.m. UTC
Sorry previous one wasn't signed off by.

The (void *) casting in the driver_data variable assignment is superfluous.
Spotted by Jani Nikula.

Signed-off-by: David Santamaría Rogado <howl.nsp at gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

kernel test robot via dri-devel Feb. 14, 2019, 10:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:13:23AM +0100, David Santamaría Rogado wrote:
>> Sorry previous one wasn't signed off by.
>
> And now you've got this comment in the commit message that's going to
> confuse people looking at the log.
>
> It's usually to put this kind of comment below the --- line...
>
>> The (void *) casting in the driver_data variable assignment is superfluous.
>> Spotted by Jani Nikula.

Please either make that

Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

or leave out completely.


>> 
>> Signed-off-by: David Santamaría Rogado <howl.nsp at gmail.com>
>> ---
>
> ... right here.
>
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Otherwise, looks good to me:
>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

With Thierry's suggestion fixed,

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
index 52e445bb1aa58..61d3361381b73 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
@@ -86,13 +86,13 @@  static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Acer"),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "One S1003"),
  },
- .driver_data = (void *)&acer_s1003,
+ .driver_data = &acer_s1003,
  }, { /* Asus T100HA */
  .matches = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "T100HAN"),
  },
- .driver_data = (void *)&asus_t100ha,
+ .driver_data = &asus_t100ha,
  }, { /*
  * GPD Pocket, note that the the DMI data is less generic then
  * it seems, devices with a board-vendor of "AMI Corporation"
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@  static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_SERIAL, "Default string"),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Default string"),
  },
- .driver_data = (void *)&gpd_pocket,
+ .driver_data = &gpd_pocket,
  }, { /* GPD Win (same note on DMI match as GPD Pocket) */
  .matches = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@  static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_SERIAL, "Default string"),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Default string"),
  },
- .driver_data = (void *)&gpd_win,
+ .driver_data = &gpd_win,
  }, { /* GPD Win 2 (too generic strings, also match on bios date) */
  .matches = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Default string"),
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@  static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Default string"),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
  },
- .driver_data = (void *)&gpd_win2,
+ .driver_data = &gpd_win2,
  }, { /* I.T.Works TW891 */
  .matches = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "To be filled by O.E.M."),
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@  static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "To be filled by O.E.M."),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "TW891"),
  },
- .driver_data = (void *)&itworks_tw891,
+ .driver_data = &itworks_tw891,
  }, { /*
  * Lenovo Ideapad Miix 310 laptop, only some production batches
  * have a portrait screen, the resolution checks makes the quirk
@@ -140,20 +140,20 @@  static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "80SG"),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "MIIX 310-10ICR"),
  },
- .driver_data = (void *)&lcd800x1280_rightside_up,
+ .driver_data = &lcd800x1280_rightside_up,
  }, { /* Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 */
  .matches = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "80XF"),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "Lenovo MIIX 320-10ICR"),
  },
- .driver_data = (void *)&lcd800x1280_rightside_up,
+ .driver_data = &lcd800x1280_rightside_up,
  }, { /* VIOS LTH17 */
  .matches = {
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "VIOS"),
   DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "LTH17"),
  },
- .driver_data = (void *)&lcd800x1280_rightside_up,
+ .driver_data = &lcd800x1280_rightside_up,
  },
  {}
 };