diff mbox

dma-buf/reservation: should keep later one in add fence(v3)

Message ID MWHPR1201MB0206A1DA76CBAC668B61AF97B4D90@MWHPR1201MB0206.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Chunming Zhou March 6, 2018, 7:19 a.m. UTC 
Patch looks ok to me, Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>, and it’s better to get others RB as well.

Regards,
David Zhou
-----Original Message-----
From: dri-devel [mailto:dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Monk Liu
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 3:01 PM
To: dri-devel@freedesktop.org
Cc: Liu, Monk <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] dma-buf/reservation: should keep later one in add fence(v3)

v2:
still check context first to avoid warning from dma_fence_is_later apply this fix in add_shared_replace as well

v3:
use a bool falg to indict if fence is need to insert to new slot and ignore it if it is an eld fence compared with the one with the same context in old->shared

Change-Id: If6a979ba9fd6c923b82212f35f07a9ff31c86767
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c index 314eb10..a7d0598 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
@@ -118,7 +118,8 @@  reservation_object_add_shared_inplace(struct reservation_object *obj,
 		old_fence = rcu_dereference_protected(fobj->shared[i],
 						reservation_object_held(obj));
 
-		if (old_fence->context == fence->context) {
+		if (old_fence->context == fence->context &&
+			dma_fence_is_later(fence, old_fence)) {
 			/* memory barrier is added by write_seqcount_begin */
 			RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[i], fence);
 			write_seqcount_end(&obj->seq);
@@ -158,6 +159,7 @@  reservation_object_add_shared_replace(struct reservation_object *obj,
 				      struct dma_fence *fence)
 {
 	unsigned i, j, k;
+	bool wrong_fence = false;
 
 	dma_fence_get(fence);
 
@@ -179,15 +181,29 @@  reservation_object_add_shared_replace(struct reservation_object *obj,
 		check = rcu_dereference_protected(old->shared[i],
 						reservation_object_held(obj));
 
-		if (check->context == fence->context ||
-		    dma_fence_is_signaled(check))
+		if (dma_fence_is_signaled(check)) {
+			/* put check to tail of fobj if signaled */
 			RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[--k], check);
-		else
+		} else if (check->context == fence->context) {
+			if (dma_fence_is_later(fence, check)) {
+				/* put check to tail of fobj if it is deprecated */
+				RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[--k], check);
+			} else {
+				/* this is a wrong operation that add an eld fence */
+				wrong_fence = true;
+				RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[j++], check);
+			}
+		} else {
+			/* add fence to new slot */
 			RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[j++], check);
+		}
 	}
+
 	fobj->shared_count = j;
-	RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[fobj->shared_count], fence);
-	fobj->shared_count++;
+	if (!wrong_fence) {
+		RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[fobj->shared_count], fence);
+		fobj->shared_count++;
+	}
 
 done:
 	preempt_disable();