@@ -712,7 +712,16 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
*/
if (dest == NEW_ADDR) {
f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range(&dn, 1);
- f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn);
+ do {
+ err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn);
+ if (err == -ENOSPC) {
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ } while (err &&
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION));
+ if (err)
+ goto err;
continue;
}
@@ -720,12 +729,14 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
if (f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dest, META_POR)) {
if (src == NULL_ADDR) {
- err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn);
- while (err &&
- IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION))
+ do {
err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn);
- /* We should not get -ENOSPC */
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, err);
+ if (err == -ENOSPC) {
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ } while (err &&
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION));
if (err)
goto err;
}
Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data() rather than letting it fails silently. Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() as below: - trigger f2fs_bug_on() only for ENOSPC case; - use do-while statement to avoid redundant codes; Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)