Message ID | 20200408135648.5824-1-vladimir@tuxera.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Assign a few generic tests to additional groups | expand |
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:56:44PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > The rationale behind the proposed changes is to correct and improve > granularity of some generic tests, so it becomes possible to control > lists of run tests better, if there is given additional information > about a test environment and tested filesystems. > > Vladimir Zapolskiy (4): > Add generic/459 test to freeze group of tests > Add generic/482 test to thin group of tests > Add generic/529 test to acl group of tests > Add generic/530 test to shutdown group of tests That's fine for me, to set more sub-cases in proper groups. Due to generally when someone writes a case, we don't take care of its group list so much. > > tests/generic/group | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.25.1 >
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:56:44PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > The rationale behind the proposed changes is to correct and improve > granularity of some generic tests, so it becomes possible to control > lists of run tests better, if there is given additional information > about a test environment and tested filesystems. Thanks for doing this! I think we could group these changes in a single patch. Could you please resend with a single patch that does all the group changes? Thanks, Eryu > > Vladimir Zapolskiy (4): > Add generic/459 test to freeze group of tests > Add generic/482 test to thin group of tests > Add generic/529 test to acl group of tests > Add generic/530 test to shutdown group of tests > > tests/generic/group | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.25.1 >
On 4/12/20 2:16 PM, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:56:44PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >> The rationale behind the proposed changes is to correct and improve >> granularity of some generic tests, so it becomes possible to control >> lists of run tests better, if there is given additional information >> about a test environment and tested filesystems. > > Thanks for doing this! I think we could group these changes in a single > patch. Could you please resend with a single patch that does all the > group changes? Sure, will do. Thank you for review! -- Best wishes, Vladimir