diff mbox series

[v2] xfs: corrupted xattr should not block removexattr

Message ID 20220603082457.2449343-1-zlang@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] xfs: corrupted xattr should not block removexattr | expand

Commit Message

Zorro Lang June 3, 2022, 8:24 a.m. UTC 
After we corrupted an attr leaf block (under node block), getxattr
might hit EFSCORRUPTED in xfs_attr_node_get when it does
xfs_attr_node_hasname. A known bug cause xfs_attr_node_get won't do
xfs_buf_trans release job, then a subsequent removexattr will hang.

This case covers a1de97fe296c ("xfs: Fix the free logic of state in
xfs_attr_node_hasname")

Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
---

Thanks the review from Darrick, V2 add/remove some comments, and give
more information to that _fail line. There might be still some disputed
places, likes the _try_scratch_mount fail return and the way to create
and get/remove xattrs. Please Feel free to tell me if you feel something
isn't good enough.

Thanks,
Zorro

 tests/xfs/999     | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/xfs/999.out |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tests/xfs/999
 create mode 100644 tests/xfs/999.out

Comments

Darrick J. Wong June 4, 2022, 12:31 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 04:24:57PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> After we corrupted an attr leaf block (under node block), getxattr
> might hit EFSCORRUPTED in xfs_attr_node_get when it does
> xfs_attr_node_hasname. A known bug cause xfs_attr_node_get won't do
> xfs_buf_trans release job, then a subsequent removexattr will hang.
> 
> This case covers a1de97fe296c ("xfs: Fix the free logic of state in
> xfs_attr_node_hasname")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
> ---
> 
> Thanks the review from Darrick, V2 add/remove some comments, and give
> more information to that _fail line. There might be still some disputed
> places, likes the _try_scratch_mount fail return and the way to create
> and get/remove xattrs. Please Feel free to tell me if you feel something
> isn't good enough.
> 
> Thanks,
> Zorro
> 
>  tests/xfs/999     | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/999.out |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/999
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/999.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/999 b/tests/xfs/999
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..73577577
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/999
> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2022 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 999
> +#
> +# This's a regression test for:
> +#   a1de97fe296c ("xfs: Fix the free logic of state in xfs_attr_node_hasname")
> +#
> +# After we corrupted an attr leaf block (under node block), getxattr might hit
> +# EFSCORRUPTED in xfs_attr_node_get when it does xfs_attr_node_hasname. A bug
> +# cause xfs_attr_node_get won't do xfs_buf_trans release job, then a subsequent
> +# removexattr will hang.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto quick attr
> +
> +# Import common functions.
> +. ./common/filter
> +. ./common/attr
> +. ./common/populate
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_fixed_by_kernel_commit a1de97fe296c \
> +       "xfs: Fix the free logic of state in xfs_attr_node_hasname"
> +
> +_require_scratch_nocheck
> +# Only test with v5 xfs on-disk format
> +_require_scratch_xfs_crc
> +_require_attrs
> +_require_populate_commands
> +_require_xfs_db_blocktrash_z_command
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs | _filter_mkfs >$seqres.full 2>$tmp.mkfs
> +source $tmp.mkfs
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Create more than $((dbsize / 32)) xattr entries to force the creation of a
> +# node block and two (or more) leaf blocks, which we need for this test.
> +nr_xattr="$((dbsize / 32))"
> +localfile="${SCRATCH_MNT}/attrfile"
> +touch $localfile
> +for ((i=0; i<nr_xattr; i++));do
> +	$SETFATTR_PROG -n user.x$(printf "%.09d" "$i") -v "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" $localfile
> +done
> +inumber="$(stat -c '%i' $localfile)"
> +_scratch_unmount
> +
> +# Expect the ablock 0 is a node block, later ablocks(>=1) are leaf blocks, then corrupt
> +# the last leaf block. (Don't corrupt node block, or can't reproduce the bug)
> +magic=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field "hdr.info.hdr.magic" "inode $inumber" "ablock 0")
> +level=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field "hdr.level" "inode $inumber" "ablock 0")
> +count=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field "hdr.count" "inode $inumber" "ablock 0")
> +if [ "$magic" = "0x3ebe" -a "$level" = "1" ];then
> +	# Corrupt the last leaf block
> +	_scratch_xfs_db -x -c "inode ${inumber}" -c "ablock $count" -c "stack" \
> +		-c "blocktrash -x 32 -y $((dbsize*8)) -3 -z" >> $seqres.full
> +else
> +	_fail "The ablock 0 (magic=$magic, level=$level) isn't a root node block, maybe case issue"
> +fi
> +
> +# This's the real testing, expect removexattr won't hang or panic.
> +if _try_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1; then
> +	for ((i=0; i<nr_xattr; i++));do
> +		$GETFATTR_PROG -n user.x$(printf "%.09d" "$i") $localfile >/dev/null 2>&1
> +		$SETFATTR_PROG -x user.x$(printf "%.09d" "$i") $localfile 2>/dev/null
> +	done
> +else
> +	# Due to we corrupt the xfs manually, so can't be sure if xfs can
> +	# detect this corruption and refuse the mount directly in one day.
> +	# If so, it's not a testing fail, so "notrun" directly to mark this
> +	# test isn't really done
> +	_notrun "XFS refused to mount with this xattr corrutpion, test skipped"

s/corrutpion/corruption/

With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> +fi
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/999.out b/tests/xfs/999.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..3b276ca8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/999.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 999
> +Silence is golden
> -- 
> 2.31.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tests/xfs/999 b/tests/xfs/999
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..73577577
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/999
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ 
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2022 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test No. 999
+#
+# This's a regression test for:
+#   a1de97fe296c ("xfs: Fix the free logic of state in xfs_attr_node_hasname")
+#
+# After we corrupted an attr leaf block (under node block), getxattr might hit
+# EFSCORRUPTED in xfs_attr_node_get when it does xfs_attr_node_hasname. A bug
+# cause xfs_attr_node_get won't do xfs_buf_trans release job, then a subsequent
+# removexattr will hang.
+#
+. ./common/preamble
+_begin_fstest auto quick attr
+
+# Import common functions.
+. ./common/filter
+. ./common/attr
+. ./common/populate
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_supported_fs xfs
+_fixed_by_kernel_commit a1de97fe296c \
+       "xfs: Fix the free logic of state in xfs_attr_node_hasname"
+
+_require_scratch_nocheck
+# Only test with v5 xfs on-disk format
+_require_scratch_xfs_crc
+_require_attrs
+_require_populate_commands
+_require_xfs_db_blocktrash_z_command
+
+_scratch_mkfs_xfs | _filter_mkfs >$seqres.full 2>$tmp.mkfs
+source $tmp.mkfs
+_scratch_mount
+
+# Create more than $((dbsize / 32)) xattr entries to force the creation of a
+# node block and two (or more) leaf blocks, which we need for this test.
+nr_xattr="$((dbsize / 32))"
+localfile="${SCRATCH_MNT}/attrfile"
+touch $localfile
+for ((i=0; i<nr_xattr; i++));do
+	$SETFATTR_PROG -n user.x$(printf "%.09d" "$i") -v "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" $localfile
+done
+inumber="$(stat -c '%i' $localfile)"
+_scratch_unmount
+
+# Expect the ablock 0 is a node block, later ablocks(>=1) are leaf blocks, then corrupt
+# the last leaf block. (Don't corrupt node block, or can't reproduce the bug)
+magic=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field "hdr.info.hdr.magic" "inode $inumber" "ablock 0")
+level=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field "hdr.level" "inode $inumber" "ablock 0")
+count=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field "hdr.count" "inode $inumber" "ablock 0")
+if [ "$magic" = "0x3ebe" -a "$level" = "1" ];then
+	# Corrupt the last leaf block
+	_scratch_xfs_db -x -c "inode ${inumber}" -c "ablock $count" -c "stack" \
+		-c "blocktrash -x 32 -y $((dbsize*8)) -3 -z" >> $seqres.full
+else
+	_fail "The ablock 0 (magic=$magic, level=$level) isn't a root node block, maybe case issue"
+fi
+
+# This's the real testing, expect removexattr won't hang or panic.
+if _try_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1; then
+	for ((i=0; i<nr_xattr; i++));do
+		$GETFATTR_PROG -n user.x$(printf "%.09d" "$i") $localfile >/dev/null 2>&1
+		$SETFATTR_PROG -x user.x$(printf "%.09d" "$i") $localfile 2>/dev/null
+	done
+else
+	# Due to we corrupt the xfs manually, so can't be sure if xfs can
+	# detect this corruption and refuse the mount directly in one day.
+	# If so, it's not a testing fail, so "notrun" directly to mark this
+	# test isn't really done
+	_notrun "XFS refused to mount with this xattr corrutpion, test skipped"
+fi
+
+echo "Silence is golden"
+# success, all done
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/xfs/999.out b/tests/xfs/999.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3b276ca8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/999.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ 
+QA output created by 999
+Silence is golden