| Message ID | 20240427075530.1236045-1-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | generic/095: add to the quick group | expand |
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 09:55:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > generic/095 doesn't take more than 4 seconds on any of my test setups, Yeah, it generally takes ~5 seconds. But there's a "LOAD_FACTOR", so before we add it into quick group, I'd like to ask do you think if it's worth increasing the default LOAD_FACTOR a bit to give it more stress, or move it to quick group directly? > but is exercises code that handles buffered write iterations interrupted > by concurrent direct I/O that no other test in the quick group does. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > --- > tests/generic/095 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/generic/095 b/tests/generic/095 > index 80448200b..9d0446e98 100755 > --- a/tests/generic/095 > +++ b/tests/generic/095 > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > # Concurrent mixed I/O (buffer I/O, aiodio, mmap, splice) on the same files > # > . ./common/preamble > -_begin_fstest auto rw stress > +_begin_fstest auto quick rw stress > > # Import common functions. > . ./common/filter > -- > 2.39.2 > >
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 01:49:53AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 09:55:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > generic/095 doesn't take more than 4 seconds on any of my test setups, > > Yeah, it generally takes ~5 seconds. But there's a "LOAD_FACTOR", so > before we add it into quick group, I'd like to ask > do you think if it's worth increasing the default LOAD_FACTOR a bit to > give it more stress, or move it to quick group directly? I'm fine with it as-is. Despite being in the stress group, this test actually provides code coverage not provided by other quick tests even in the most basic version.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 01:49:53AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 09:55:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > generic/095 doesn't take more than 4 seconds on any of my test setups, > > Yeah, it generally takes ~5 seconds. But there's a "LOAD_FACTOR", so On what kind of storage hardware? If it's that fast even on spinning rust then I guess you could double the iodepth*/numjobs computations. (What happens if numjobs exceeds the 9 defined in the fio config file?) > before we add it into quick group, I'd like to ask > do you think if it's worth increasing the default LOAD_FACTOR a bit to > give it more stress, or move it to quick group directly? I'd move it to the quick group. --D > > but is exercises code that handles buffered write iterations interrupted > > by concurrent direct I/O that no other test in the quick group does. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > --- > > tests/generic/095 | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/095 b/tests/generic/095 > > index 80448200b..9d0446e98 100755 > > --- a/tests/generic/095 > > +++ b/tests/generic/095 > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > > # Concurrent mixed I/O (buffer I/O, aiodio, mmap, splice) on the same files > > # > > . ./common/preamble > > -_begin_fstest auto rw stress > > +_begin_fstest auto quick rw stress > > > > # Import common functions. > > . ./common/filter > > -- > > 2.39.2 > > > > > >
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:59:54AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 01:49:53AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 09:55:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > generic/095 doesn't take more than 4 seconds on any of my test setups, > > > > Yeah, it generally takes ~5 seconds. But there's a "LOAD_FACTOR", so > > On what kind of storage hardware? If it's that fast even on spinning > rust then I guess you could double the iodepth*/numjobs computations. On most of our testing machines, even very old (10+ years ago) with general HP scsi disk, nothing special. # lshw -class disk *-disk description: SCSI Disk product: LOGICAL VOLUME vendor: HP physical id: 1.0.0 bus info: scsi@2:1.0.0 logical name: /dev/sda version: 6.00 serial: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx size: 931GiB (1TB) capabilities: 15000rpm gpt-1.00 partitioned partitioned:gpt # ./check generic/095 FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hp-xxxx-xxx 6.9.0-0.rc5.20240425gite88c4cfcb7b8.47.fc41.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Apr 25 14:21:52 UTC 2024 MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f /dev/sda4 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda4 /mnt/scratch generic/095 2s ... 2s Ran: generic/095 Passed all 1 tests > > (What happens if numjobs exceeds the 9 defined in the fio config file?) # export LOAD_FACTOR=3; ./check generic/095 FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hp-dl380pg8-01 6.9.0-0.rc5.20240425gite88c4cfcb7b8.47.fc41.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Apr 25 14:21:52 UTC 2024 MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f /dev/sda4 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda4 /mnt/scratch generic/095 3s ... 3s Ran: generic/095 Passed all 1 tests # export LOAD_FACTOR=4; ./check generic/095 FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hp-dl380pg8-01 6.9.0-0.rc5.20240425gite88c4cfcb7b8.47.fc41.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Apr 25 14:21:52 UTC 2024 MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f /dev/sda4 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda4 /mnt/scratch generic/095 3s ... - output mismatch (see /root/git/xfstests/results//generic/095.out.bad) --- tests/generic/095.out 2024-03-02 20:15:52.580273536 +0800 +++ /root/git/xfstests/results//generic/095.out.bad 2024-04-30 02:46:27.874906090 +0800 @@ -1,2 +1,6 @@ QA output created by 095 +fio: first I/O failed. If /mnt/scratch/file1 is a zoned block device, consider --zonemode=zbd +fio: first I/O failed. If /mnt/scratch/file1 is a zoned block device, consider --zonemode=zbd +fio: first I/O failed. If /mnt/scratch/file1 is a zoned block device, consider --zonemode=zbd +fio: first I/O failed. If /mnt/scratch/file1 is a zoned block device, consider --zonemode=zbd Silence is golden ... (Run 'diff -u /root/git/xfstests/tests/generic/095.out /root/git/xfstests/results//generic/095.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Ran: generic/095 Failures: generic/095 Failed 1 of 1 tests This failure looks like: https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/a8f03f2c-5951-4aea-856b-218326815302@kernel.dk/ # rpm -q fio fio-3.37-1.fc41.x86_64 > > > before we add it into quick group, I'd like to ask > > do you think if it's worth increasing the default LOAD_FACTOR a bit to > > give it more stress, or move it to quick group directly? > > I'd move it to the quick group. OK, Christoph likes that too, let's move it to quick. Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com> Thanks, Zorro > > --D > > > > but is exercises code that handles buffered write iterations interrupted > > > by concurrent direct I/O that no other test in the quick group does. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > > --- > > > tests/generic/095 | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/095 b/tests/generic/095 > > > index 80448200b..9d0446e98 100755 > > > --- a/tests/generic/095 > > > +++ b/tests/generic/095 > > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > > > # Concurrent mixed I/O (buffer I/O, aiodio, mmap, splice) on the same files > > > # > > > . ./common/preamble > > > -_begin_fstest auto rw stress > > > +_begin_fstest auto quick rw stress > > > > > > # Import common functions. > > > . ./common/filter > > > -- > > > 2.39.2 > > > > > > > > > > >
diff --git a/tests/generic/095 b/tests/generic/095 index 80448200b..9d0446e98 100755 --- a/tests/generic/095 +++ b/tests/generic/095 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ # Concurrent mixed I/O (buffer I/O, aiodio, mmap, splice) on the same files # . ./common/preamble -_begin_fstest auto rw stress +_begin_fstest auto quick rw stress # Import common functions. . ./common/filter
generic/095 doesn't take more than 4 seconds on any of my test setups, but is exercises code that handles buffered write iterations interrupted by concurrent direct I/O that no other test in the quick group does. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- tests/generic/095 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)