From patchwork Mon Jul 29 08:47:15 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: yangerkun X-Patchwork-Id: 13744575 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7148328B6 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722243040; cv=none; b=lDBZQ/Zl77TRWhhwP+ITcVnwzhztOT4Z8oFDOTelQR2KiJui9m9uoZP+qBCWmKgU4s2oMk++MOXBWaO8BK5mliAoIyP3Q/3i1QolDbo7TsmF7y18jiqqVFvupw4KLpBn7I7r2GUVCTjcXxLNjYNwT0+L4gI1ALDtHr8P+rvEwXc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722243040; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aZgvztVTvmtA0wH5pm0pkg2+u8/zuSpiqCrHtnpF48c=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VTsZFe8IesWb37muRm3udxKB+hgM//Sx9eoVAK6FT2/+kucs8p+pAFE6LFO4V5R+UGE1z+Wo/5cqUJ+rTVr3OSnQUAEMZQYb/JVsIbi/a01vqMrOZSmsh0oLSAO3N2i3LxS/9Q4seBPOvOwVrioBzdl9Tv9U4dOMxXtkNgoLixs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.105]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WXX8F30b4zdkPX; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 16:48:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemf100006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.181.220]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E14F4140444; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 16:50:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.175.104.67) by kwepemf100006.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 16:50:34 +0800 From: Yang Erkun To: , CC: , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] generic/732: don't run it on tmpfs Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 16:47:15 +0800 Message-ID: <20240729084715.1736839-2-yangerkun@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240729084715.1736839-1-yangerkun@huawei.com> References: <20240729084715.1736839-1-yangerkun@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemf100006.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.220) Like what 4fd042e0465c("generic/732: don't run it on NFS") say, the same options for tmpfs won't share the same backend. Skip it for tmpfs. Besides, add some explanation for why we should skip tmpfs. Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- tests/generic/732 | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/generic/732 b/tests/generic/732 index d8475cda..d08028c2 100755 --- a/tests/generic/732 +++ b/tests/generic/732 @@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ _cleanup() rm -r -f $tmp.* } -_supported_fs ^nfs ^overlay +# This case give a assumption that the same mount options for +# different mount point will share the same superblock, which won't +# sucess for the follow fs. +_supported_fs ^nfs ^overlay ^tmpfs _require_test _require_scratch