Message ID | 20210207181439.1178-1-charvi077@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Improve the 'fixup [-C | -c]' in interactive rebase | expand |
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 1:18 PM Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com> wrote: > This patch series is build on the top of "cm/rebase-i" in the 'next' branch and > improves it. It fixup the source code of 'fixup [-C | -c]' command in the > sequencer, do some fixes in rebase -i, improves the 'fixup_-C' like commands > in lib-rebase.sh, update the test-script 't3437' and fixes a typo in the > documentation. Thanks for working on this. I looked over the entire series and left a few minor comments. As mentioned in my [6/7] review, you might also want to consider splitting that patch into several patches (though it's not clear if the extra work of doing so is warranted). Anyhow, aside from some botched indentation in [6/7], it all looked clean.
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 00:28, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 1:18 PM Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com> wrote: > > This patch series is build on the top of "cm/rebase-i" in the 'next' branch and > > improves it. It fixup the source code of 'fixup [-C | -c]' command in the > > sequencer, do some fixes in rebase -i, improves the 'fixup_-C' like commands > > in lib-rebase.sh, update the test-script 't3437' and fixes a typo in the > > documentation. > > Thanks for working on this. I looked over the entire series and left a > few minor comments. As mentioned in my [6/7] review, you might also > want to consider splitting that patch into several patches (though > it's not clear if the extra work of doing so is warranted). Anyhow, > aside from some botched indentation in [6/7], it all looked clean. Thanks for the corrections. I admit there are few silly mistakes, will fixup all and also split [6/7] in the next version. Thanks and Regards, Charvi