mbox series

[00/12] tree-wide: chip away at USE_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS

Message ID cover-00.12-00000000000-20221118T112205Z-avarab@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series tree-wide: chip away at USE_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS | expand

Message

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason Nov. 18, 2022, 11:30 a.m. UTC
As 3/12 here notes we've been undergoing a sloooow migration away from
functions that provide "the_index" for you since 2007, with the last
major move away from some of them being in 2019.

This series has a large diffstat, but should be disproportionately
easy to review as I wrote almost none of the code: coccinelle did :)

I.e. after some trivial cleanup in 1-2/12 the C code changes in 3/12
are mostly generated from a new index-compatibility.cocci migration.

The commits that deviate from that are:

 * 04/12: Make a function that always returns "0" return "void"
   instead.

 * 09-10/12: Add a "USE_THE_INDEX_VARIABLE", for those leftover users
   that only need "the_index", but not the compatility macros.

 * 12/12: Manual follow-up to the cocci-applied 11/12.

The only exceptions to this are the changes to cache.h itself, and
moving things around in contrib/coccinelle/* as we can fully migrate
some things, so they move from a "pending" rule to a regular
coccinelle rule.

At the start of this the patch to migrate all of this would have been
~2k lines, after it's down to below ~1k.

I've carefully crafted this so that it doesn't have conflicts with
anything that's in-flight, or is likely to develop such conflicts (but
I could always get unlucky). If there are any the resolution should be
trivially validated by running the cocci rule on "theirs" and keeping
that version.

Branch & passing CI at:
https://github.com/avar/git/tree/avar/narrow-down-the-index-compatibilty-macros

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (12):
  cache.h: remove unused "the_index" compat macros
  builtin/{grep,log}.: don't define "USE_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS"
  cocci & cache.h: remove rarely used "the_index" compat macros
  read-cache API & users: make discard_index() return void
  cocci: add a index-compatibility.pending.cocci
  cocci & cache.h: apply a selection of "pending" index-compatibility
  cocci & cache.h: apply variable section of "pending"
    index-compatibility
  cocci: apply "pending" index-compatibility to "t/helper/*.c"
  {builtin/*,repository}.c: add & use "USE_THE_INDEX_VARIABLE"
  cache.h & test-tool.h: add & use "USE_THE_INDEX_VARIABLE"
  cocci: apply "pending" index-compatibility to some "builtin/*.c"
  builtin/*: remove or amend "USE_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS"

 add-interactive.c                             |  8 +-
 add-patch.c                                   |  3 +-
 builtin/add.c                                 | 21 ++---
 builtin/am.c                                  |  4 +-
 builtin/cat-file.c                            |  2 +-
 builtin/check-attr.c                          |  4 +-
 builtin/check-ignore.c                        |  4 +-
 builtin/checkout-index.c                      | 19 ++--
 builtin/checkout.c                            | 55 ++++++------
 builtin/clean.c                               |  6 +-
 builtin/clone.c                               |  4 +-
 builtin/commit.c                              | 20 ++---
 builtin/describe.c                            |  7 +-
 builtin/diff-files.c                          |  3 +-
 builtin/diff-index.c                          |  5 +-
 builtin/diff-tree.c                           |  4 +-
 builtin/difftool.c                            |  2 +-
 builtin/fsck.c                                | 16 ++--
 builtin/grep.c                                |  1 -
 builtin/log.c                                 |  1 -
 builtin/merge-index.c                         | 16 ++--
 builtin/merge-ours.c                          |  3 +-
 builtin/merge-tree.c                          |  2 +-
 builtin/merge.c                               | 13 +--
 builtin/mv.c                                  | 25 +++---
 builtin/pull.c                                |  6 +-
 builtin/read-tree.c                           |  6 +-
 builtin/rebase.c                              |  6 +-
 builtin/reset.c                               | 20 +++--
 builtin/rev-parse.c                           |  4 +-
 builtin/rm.c                                  | 18 ++--
 builtin/stash.c                               |  8 +-
 builtin/submodule--helper.c                   | 14 +--
 builtin/update-index.c                        | 72 +++++++--------
 cache.h                                       | 30 ++-----
 contrib/coccinelle/index-compatibility.cocci  | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../index-compatibility.pending.cocci         | 78 +++++++++++++++++
 read-cache.c                                  |  4 +-
 repository.c                                  |  2 +-
 sequencer.c                                   | 15 ++--
 t/helper/test-dump-cache-tree.c               |  5 +-
 t/helper/test-dump-split-index.c              |  1 +
 t/helper/test-dump-untracked-cache.c          |  4 +-
 t/helper/test-fast-rebase.c                   |  4 +-
 t/helper/test-lazy-init-name-hash.c           | 21 ++---
 t/helper/test-read-cache.c                    |  5 +-
 t/helper/test-scrap-cache-tree.c              |  9 +-
 t/helper/test-write-cache.c                   |  6 +-
 48 files changed, 417 insertions(+), 256 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 contrib/coccinelle/index-compatibility.cocci
 create mode 100644 contrib/coccinelle/index-compatibility.pending.cocci

Comments

Phillip Wood Nov. 18, 2022, 12:13 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Ævar

On 18/11/2022 11:30, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> As 3/12 here notes we've been undergoing a sloooow migration away from
> functions that provide "the_index" for you since 2007, with the last
> major move away from some of them being in 2019.

The commit cited in 3/12 actually introduced most of these macros. What 
it did was remove the dependency on `the_index` from cache.c. Maybe I'm 
missing some context but I struggling to see the benefit in removing the 
macros with out removing the dependency on `the_index`. Doing that would 
require much more manual work as it cannot be automated with coccinelle 
but it would provide a tangible benefit which I don't see here.

Best Wishes

Phillip
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason Nov. 18, 2022, 12:21 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Nov 18 2022, Phillip Wood wrote:

> Hi Ævar
>
> On 18/11/2022 11:30, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> As 3/12 here notes we've been undergoing a sloooow migration away from
>> functions that provide "the_index" for you since 2007, with the last
>> major move away from some of them being in 2019.
>
> The commit cited in 3/12 actually introduced most of these
> macros. What it did was remove the dependency on `the_index` from
> cache.c. Maybe I'm missing some context but I struggling to see the
> benefit in removing the macros with out removing the dependency on
> `the_index`. Doing that would require much more manual work as it
> cannot be automated with coccinelle but it would provide a tangible
> benefit which I don't see here.

I didn't cover this myself as I figured the linked-to commits & context
covered it: But no, there is no great benefit to doing this, it's just
janitorial work.

My proximate motivation for this is having written this to libify some
code in a parallel series: [1].

Does that in itself justify this? No, far from it. But we've had this
supposed online migration for years, I tihnk we shouldn't rush to do
those sorts of things needlessly (e.g. let's avoid conflicts with other
in-flight stuff, if it can be helped), but leaving it for another 4-10
years would also suck.

1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-v9-09.12-f29343197eb-20221118T110058Z-avarab@gmail.com/