Message ID | cover.1665612094.git.me@ttaylorr.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | midx: trace2 regions and grab-bag patches | expand |
On 10/12/2022 6:01 PM, Taylor Blau wrote: > Here is a small handful of MIDX and MIDX bitmap-related patches that > I've been carrying in GitHub's fork for a while now and forgot to send > upstream. > > The first is a small typofix, and the second is a legitimate bug fix > which allows us to consider annotated tags as bitmap candidates during > commit selection. The final two are trace2 regions and instrumentation > that I've found helpful when rolling out MIDX bitmaps in a production > setting. > > Sorry that these are so disjointed in nature ;-). I figured that it was > better to send a grab-bag series like this than to hold onto these > patches forever! As advertised, this set of patches are all nice and small. I've found the additional tracing useful during performance investigations and unobtrusive otherwise. Though they looked familiar, I gave them a careful read and have no comments. LGTM. Thanks, -Stolee
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> writes: > On 10/12/2022 6:01 PM, Taylor Blau wrote: >> Here is a small handful of MIDX and MIDX bitmap-related patches that >> I've been carrying in GitHub's fork for a while now and forgot to send >> upstream. >> >> The first is a small typofix, and the second is a legitimate bug fix >> which allows us to consider annotated tags as bitmap candidates during >> commit selection. The final two are trace2 regions and instrumentation >> that I've found helpful when rolling out MIDX bitmaps in a production >> setting. >> >> Sorry that these are so disjointed in nature ;-). I figured that it was >> better to send a grab-bag series like this than to hold onto these >> patches forever! > > As advertised, this set of patches are all nice and small. I've found > the additional tracing useful during performance investigations and > unobtrusive otherwise. > > Though they looked familiar, I gave them a careful read and have no > comments. LGTM. Yeah, they look good to me, too. Thanks, both.