Message ID | cover.1686505920.git.code@khaugsbakk.name (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | range-diff: treat notes like `log` | expand |
Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> writes: > This is the first normal (not RFC) version of this series. The following > cover letter is identical to the previous one up to but not including > section “RFC and version 1”. I have no strong opinion on the topic and did not comment on the RFC version, either, so I am puzzled to be CC'ed, especially when the primary author of the feature is not. Dscho, how does this series look? Thanks.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023, at 00:25, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> writes: > >> This is the first normal (not RFC) version of this series. The following >> cover letter is identical to the previous one up to but not including >> section “RFC and version 1”. > > I have no strong opinion on the topic and did not comment on the RFC > version, either, so I am puzzled to be CC'ed, especially when the > primary author of the feature is not. The CC list is the output of `contrib/contacts/git-contacts master..HEAD`. I’ll include Dscho if I make another series that touches this part of the tree. Cheers