[0/3] Die preserve ggg

Message

Linus Arver via GitGitGadget May 26, 2022, 9:21 a.m. UTC

This short series is a follow up to GitGitGadget "Update the die()
preserve-merges messages to help some users (PR #1155)" [1].

The first patch is a tidy up of the --preserve option to highlight that it
is now Deleted, rather than Deprecated.

In response to Avar's comments that the former error message merely
'tantilised without telling' the user what to do, it became obvious that the
underling problem was that the user was unable to git rebase --abort which
was also fatal, when a preserve-rebase was in progress.

Thus the main update is to allow the rebase --abort command, even when a
--preserve is in progress, to proceed. The --abort code was unchanged by the
removal of the preserve option, as the resetting and clean up of internal
state is common to the other rebase options.

The user facing fatal message now simply advises to abort, or downgrade to a
version that has preserve-merges to complete the rebase.

The final patch highlights that some IDEs still allow the setting of the
preserve-merges option as a pull config setup.

Philip Oakly

[1] GitLore ref [e-mail]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[e-mail]/

Philip Oakley (3):
  rebase.c: state preserve-merges has been removed
  rebase: help users when dying with `preserve-merges`
  rebase: note `preserve` merges may be a pull config option

 builtin/rebase.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


base-commit: c4f0e309ae745751d08727f24e8ff55e56355755
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1242%2FPhilipOakley%2Fdie_preserve_ggg-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1242/PhilipOakley/die_preserve_ggg-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1242

Comments

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason May 26, 2022, 9:54 a.m. UTC | #1

On Thu, May 26 2022, Philip Oakley via GitGitGadget wrote:

> This short series is a follow up to GitGitGadget "Update the die()
> preserve-merges messages to help some users (PR #1155)" [1].
>
> The first patch is a tidy up of the --preserve option to highlight that it
> is now Deleted, rather than Deprecated.
>
> In response to Avar's comments that the former error message merely
> 'tantilised without telling' the user what to do, it became obvious that the
> underling problem was that the user was unable to git rebase --abort which
> was also fatal, when a preserve-rebase was in progress.

Thanks a lot for following up on this, this all looks OK to me. I had
some minor comments about maybe tweaking this & that, but as far as I'm
concerned this could go in as-is, depending on whether you think it
needs a re-roll in response to my comments + others.

Philip Oakley May 26, 2022, 12:57 p.m. UTC | #2

On 26/05/2022 10:54, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Thu, May 26 2022, Philip Oakley via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
>> This short series is a follow up to GitGitGadget "Update the die()
>> preserve-merges messages to help some users (PR #1155)" [1].
>>
>> The first patch is a tidy up of the --preserve option to highlight that it
>> is now Deleted, rather than Deprecated.
>>
>> In response to Avar's comments that the former error message merely
>> 'tantilised without telling' the user what to do, it became obvious that the
>> underling problem was that the user was unable to git rebase --abort which
>> was also fatal, when a preserve-rebase was in progress.
> Thanks a lot for following up on this, this all looks OK to me. I had
> some minor comments about maybe tweaking this & that, but as far as I'm
> concerned this could go in as-is, depending on whether you think it
> needs a re-roll in response to my comments + others.
Thanks, I am a bit busy with family issues, so I'd rather use as-is,
unless other feel that the tweaks will be worth it.
I'm effectively off-line for the next 5-6 days anyway.
--
Philip