Message ID | pull.1333.v2.git.1662734015.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Bundle URIs III: Parse and download from bundle lists | expand |
On 9/9/2022 10:33 AM, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote: > Updates in v2 > ============= > > Thank you to all of the voices who chimed in on the previous version. I'm > sorry it took so long for me to get a new version. > > * I've done a rather thorough overhaul to minimize how often later patches > rewrite portions of earlier patches. > > * We no longer use a strbuf in struct remote_bundle_info. Instead, use a > 'char *' and only in the patch where it is first used. > > * The config documentation is more clearly indicating that the bundle.* > section has no effect in the repository config (at the moment, which will > change in the next series). > > * The bundle.version value is now parsed using git_parse_int(). > > * The config key is now parsed using parse_config_key(). > > * Commit messages clarify more about the context of the change in the > bigger picture of the bundle URI effort. > > * Some printf()s are correctly changed to fprintf()s. > > * The test helper CLI is unified across the two modes. They both take a > filename now. > > * The count of downloaded bundles is now only updated after a successful > download, allowing the "any" mode to keep trying after a failure. If some of the reviewers from v1 could check that I responded to their comments, then that would be a big help to getting this series moving again. Thanks, -Stolee
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> writes: > If some of the reviewers from v1 could check that I responded to their > comments, then that would be a big help to getting this series moving > again. Thanks for a ping. Also, if reviewers who missed v1 can take a look and give fresh insights, that would also help polishing the series further.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> writes: > > > If some of the reviewers from v1 could check that I responded to their > > comments, then that would be a big help to getting this series moving > > again. Yes, all my comments from v1 were indeed addressed, thanks. > Thanks for a ping. Also, if reviewers who missed v1 can take a look > and give fresh insights, that would also help polishing the series > further. I didn't miss v1 but I gave some new insights. :-) The patch set looks good except for some commands I had on the last one.
On 9/29/2022 6:00 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: >> Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> writes: >> >>> If some of the reviewers from v1 could check that I responded to their >>> comments, then that would be a big help to getting this series moving >>> again. > > Yes, all my comments from v1 were indeed addressed, thanks. > >> Thanks for a ping. Also, if reviewers who missed v1 can take a look >> and give fresh insights, that would also help polishing the series >> further. > > I didn't miss v1 but I gave some new insights. :-) The patch set looks > good except for some commands I had on the last one. Thanks for taking a detailed look. I've added extra "any" mode tests to my local branch in addition to the code changes you recommended. I'll plan to send a v3 early next week, giving time for any other review comments to trickle in. Thanks, -Stolee