Message ID | pull.1660.v2.git.git.1706534881.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | completion: remove hardcoded config variable names | expand |
"Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > Changes since v1: > > * Corrected my email in PATCH 2/5 (sorry for the noise) > > v1: This series removes hardcoded config variable names in the > __git_complete_config_variable_name function, partly by adding a new mode to > 'git help'. It also adds completion for 'submodule.*' config variables, > which were previously missing. > > I think it makes sense to do that in the same series since it's closely > related, and splitting it would result in textual conflicts between both > series if one does not build on top of the other, but I'm open to other > suggestions. > > Thanks, Neither rounds of this series unfortunately got any review. Comments from anybody interested in helping to improve completion scripts? Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 02:08:07PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > > > Changes since v1: > > > > * Corrected my email in PATCH 2/5 (sorry for the noise) > > > > v1: This series removes hardcoded config variable names in the > > __git_complete_config_variable_name function, partly by adding a new mode to > > 'git help'. It also adds completion for 'submodule.*' config variables, > > which were previously missing. > > > > I think it makes sense to do that in the same series since it's closely > > related, and splitting it would result in textual conflicts between both > > series if one does not build on top of the other, but I'm open to other > > suggestions. > > > > Thanks, > > Neither rounds of this series unfortunately got any review. > Comments from anybody interested in helping to improve completion > scripts? Well, I've spent some time with Bash completion recently, so let me give it a go. I was trying to avoid the dense Bash logic and thus shied away from reviewing it. But the end result of having less hardcoded values is quite nice indeed. Patrick