mbox series

[v2,0/3] Feature: New Variable git-p4.p4program

Message ID pull.465.v2.git.1573828978.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Feature: New Variable git-p4.p4program | expand

Message

Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget Nov. 15, 2019, 2:42 p.m. UTC
Issue: Using git-p4.py on Windows does not resolve properly to the p4.exe
binary in all instances.

Changes since v1: Commit: (dc6817e) 2019-11-14

Renamed the variable "git-p4.binary" to "git-p4.p4program" per the thread
discussion.

v1:

Two new code features are added to resolve the p4 executable location:

 1. A new variable, git-p4.binary, has been added that takes precedence over
    the default p4 executable name. If this git option is set and the
    path.exists() passes for this file it will be used as executable for the 
    system.popen calls.
    
    
 2. If the new variable git-p4.binary is not set, the program checks if the
    operating system is Windows. If it is, the executable is changed to
    'p4.exe'. All other operating systems
    (those that do not report 'Windows' in the platform.system() call)
    continue to use the current executable of 'p4'.

Ben Keene (3):
  Cast byte strings to unicode strings in python3
  Added general variable git-p4.binary and added a default for windows
    of 'P4.EXE'
  Changed the name of the parameter from git-p4.binary to
    git-p4.p4program

 Documentation/git-p4.txt |  5 +++++
 git-p4.py                | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


base-commit: d9f6f3b6195a0ca35642561e530798ad1469bd41
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-465%2Fseraphire%2Fseraphire%2Fp4-binary-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-465/seraphire/seraphire/p4-binary-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/465

Range-diff vs v1:

 1:  0bca930ff8 = 1:  0bca930ff8 Cast byte strings to unicode strings in python3
 2:  98bae92fda = 2:  98bae92fda Added general variable git-p4.binary and added a default for windows of 'P4.EXE'
 -:  ---------- > 3:  dc6817eea3 Changed the name of the parameter from git-p4.binary to git-p4.p4program

Comments

Junio C Hamano Nov. 16, 2019, 2:40 a.m. UTC | #1
"Ben Keene via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> Ben Keene (3):
>   Cast byte strings to unicode strings in python3
>   Added general variable git-p4.binary and added a default for windows
>     of 'P4.EXE'
>   Changed the name of the parameter from git-p4.binary to
>     git-p4.p4program

That's rather poor organization.  In the larger picture, nobody
wants to even know jthat you used to call git-p4.p4program with a
different name or what that different name was.  They do not even
need to know why the new name is an improvement (but you do not even
discuss to justify the name change in the proposed log message of
3/3, which is even worse X-<).

When presenting your work to the public, Git lets you pretend to be
a perfect human who never made mistake while preparing it and built
the series as a logical progression with perfect foresight.  That is
how "git rebase -i" is useful.  Learn to take advantage of that ;-)

As to individual patches, our local (read: project specific)
convention around here is to state the are the patch touches (in the
case of these patches, "git-p4" is the appropriate area name), colon,
and then a one-line summary of what the step is about (the last one
is done without initial capitalization).  The summary is written with
the focus more on why and what than how.

Thanks.
Junio C Hamano Nov. 18, 2019, 1:15 a.m. UTC | #2
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> As to individual patches, our local (read: project specific)
> convention around here is to state the are the patch touches (in the
> case of these patches, "git-p4" is the appropriate area name), colon,
> and then a one-line summary of what the step is about (the last one
> is done without initial capitalization).  The summary is written with
> the focus more on why and what than how.


Sorry for a late typofix.  "to state the AREA the patch touches" was
what I meant.  So I would expect all patches to this file (which is
the only component of 'git-p4' subsystem) to begin with "git-p4: "
prefix.

Thanks.
Ben Keene Dec. 3, 2019, 3:59 p.m. UTC | #3
On 11/17/2019 8:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> As to individual patches, our local (read: project specific)
>> convention around here is to state the are the patch touches (in the
>> case of these patches, "git-p4" is the appropriate area name), colon,
>> and then a one-line summary of what the step is about (the last one
>> is done without initial capitalization).  The summary is written with
>> the focus more on why and what than how.
>
> Sorry for a late typofix.  "to state the AREA the patch touches" was
> what I meant.  So I would expect all patches to this file (which is
> the only component of 'git-p4' subsystem) to begin with "git-p4: "
> prefix.
>
> Thanks.
I was having email trouble trying to reply to your suggestions. 
(Downloaded yet another mail client, and this seems to work)  I'll make 
those changes.