diff mbox series

multi-pack-index: make code -Wunused-parameter clean

Message ID 20181104004957.52913-1-carenas@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series multi-pack-index: make code -Wunused-parameter clean | expand

Commit Message

Carlo Arenas Nov. 4, 2018, 12:49 a.m. UTC
introduced in 662148c435 ("midx: write object offsets", 2018-07-12)
but included on all previous versions as well.

midx.c:713:54: warning: unused parameter 'nr_objects' [-Wunused-parameter]

likely an oversight as the information needed to iterate over is
embedded in nr_large_offset

Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
---
 midx.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Jeff King Nov. 4, 2018, 2:27 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 05:49:57PM -0700, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote:

> introduced in 662148c435 ("midx: write object offsets", 2018-07-12)
> but included on all previous versions as well.
> 
> midx.c:713:54: warning: unused parameter 'nr_objects' [-Wunused-parameter]
> 
> likely an oversight as the information needed to iterate over is
> embedded in nr_large_offset

I've been preparing a series to make the whole code base compile with
-Wunused-parameter, and I handled this case a bit differently.

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] midx: double-check large object write loop

The write_midx_large_offsets() function takes an array of object
entries, the number of entries in the array (nr_objects), and the number
of entries with large offsets (nr_large_offset). But we never actually
use nr_objects; instead we keep walking down the array and counting down
nr_large_offset until we've seen all of the large entries.

This is correct, but we can be a bit more defensive. If there were ever
a mismatch between nr_large_offset and the actual set of large-offset
objects, we'd walk off the end of the array.

Since we know the size of the array, we can use nr_objects to make sure
we don't walk too far.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
 midx.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/midx.c b/midx.c
index 4fac0cd08a..ecd583666a 100644
--- a/midx.c
+++ b/midx.c
@@ -712,12 +712,18 @@ static size_t write_midx_object_offsets(struct hashfile *f, int large_offset_nee
 static size_t write_midx_large_offsets(struct hashfile *f, uint32_t nr_large_offset,
 				       struct pack_midx_entry *objects, uint32_t nr_objects)
 {
-	struct pack_midx_entry *list = objects;
+	struct pack_midx_entry *list = objects, *end = objects + nr_objects;
 	size_t written = 0;
 
 	while (nr_large_offset) {
-		struct pack_midx_entry *obj = list++;
-		uint64_t offset = obj->offset;
+		struct pack_midx_entry *obj;
+		uint64_t offset;
+
+		if (list >= end)
+			BUG("too many large-offset objects");
+
+		obj = list++;
+		offset = obj->offset;
 
 		if (!(offset >> 31))
 			continue;
Derrick Stolee Nov. 5, 2018, 4:48 p.m. UTC | #2
On 11/3/2018 10:27 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 05:49:57PM -0700, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote:
>
>> introduced in 662148c435 ("midx: write object offsets", 2018-07-12)
>> but included on all previous versions as well.
>>
>> midx.c:713:54: warning: unused parameter 'nr_objects' [-Wunused-parameter]
>>
>> likely an oversight as the information needed to iterate over is
>> embedded in nr_large_offset
> I've been preparing a series to make the whole code base compile with
> -Wunused-parameter, and I handled this case a bit differently.
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] midx: double-check large object write loop
>
> The write_midx_large_offsets() function takes an array of object
> entries, the number of entries in the array (nr_objects), and the number
> of entries with large offsets (nr_large_offset). But we never actually
> use nr_objects; instead we keep walking down the array and counting down
> nr_large_offset until we've seen all of the large entries.
>
> This is correct, but we can be a bit more defensive. If there were ever
> a mismatch between nr_large_offset and the actual set of large-offset
> objects, we'd walk off the end of the array.
>
> Since we know the size of the array, we can use nr_objects to make sure
> we don't walk too far.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>

Thanks, both, for catching this. I prefer the approach that adds defenses.

Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>

> ---
>   midx.c | 12 +++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/midx.c b/midx.c
> index 4fac0cd08a..ecd583666a 100644
> --- a/midx.c
> +++ b/midx.c
> @@ -712,12 +712,18 @@ static size_t write_midx_object_offsets(struct hashfile *f, int large_offset_nee
>   static size_t write_midx_large_offsets(struct hashfile *f, uint32_t nr_large_offset,
>   				       struct pack_midx_entry *objects, uint32_t nr_objects)
>   {
> -	struct pack_midx_entry *list = objects;
> +	struct pack_midx_entry *list = objects, *end = objects + nr_objects;
>   	size_t written = 0;
>   
>   	while (nr_large_offset) {
> -		struct pack_midx_entry *obj = list++;
> -		uint64_t offset = obj->offset;
> +		struct pack_midx_entry *obj;
> +		uint64_t offset;
> +
> +		if (list >= end)
> +			BUG("too many large-offset objects");
> +
> +		obj = list++;
> +		offset = obj->offset;
>   
>   		if (!(offset >> 31))
>   			continue;
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/midx.c b/midx.c
index 4fac0cd08a..a2c17e3108 100644
--- a/midx.c
+++ b/midx.c
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@  static size_t write_midx_object_offsets(struct hashfile *f, int large_offset_nee
 }
 
 static size_t write_midx_large_offsets(struct hashfile *f, uint32_t nr_large_offset,
-				       struct pack_midx_entry *objects, uint32_t nr_objects)
+				       struct pack_midx_entry *objects)
 {
 	struct pack_midx_entry *list = objects;
 	size_t written = 0;
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@  int write_midx_file(const char *object_dir)
 				break;
 
 			case MIDX_CHUNKID_LARGEOFFSETS:
-				written += write_midx_large_offsets(f, num_large_offsets, entries, nr_entries);
+				written += write_midx_large_offsets(f, num_large_offsets, entries);
 				break;
 
 			default: