Message ID | 20200608062356.40264-4-sunshine@sunshineco.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | worktree: tighten duplicate path detection | expand |
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes: > Readers of the name prune_worktree() are likely to expect the function > to actually prune a worktree, however, it only answers the question > "should this worktree be pruned?". Give it a name more reflective of its > true purpose to avoid such confusion. 100% agreed.
diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c index f7351413af..27681a1396 100644 --- a/builtin/worktree.c +++ b/builtin/worktree.c @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void delete_worktrees_dir_if_empty(void) rmdir(git_path("worktrees")); /* ignore failed removal */ } -static int prune_worktree(const char *id, struct strbuf *reason) +static int should_prune_worktree(const char *id, struct strbuf *reason) { struct stat st; char *path; @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void prune_worktrees(void) if (is_dot_or_dotdot(d->d_name)) continue; strbuf_reset(&reason); - if (!prune_worktree(d->d_name, &reason)) + if (!should_prune_worktree(d->d_name, &reason)) continue; if (show_only || verbose) printf_ln(_("Removing %s/%s: %s"),
Readers of the name prune_worktree() are likely to expect the function to actually prune a worktree, however, it only answers the question "should this worktree be pruned?". Give it a name more reflective of its true purpose to avoid such confusion. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> --- builtin/worktree.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)