From patchwork Wed Mar 20 09:37:40 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff King X-Patchwork-Id: 13597657 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [104.130.231.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335E53B78B for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.130.231.41 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710927464; cv=none; b=iDLTkoiba2vRBDafrkuegEFBVQpF+r9vLVBjo0K9dWcCbucZcxN4ErntqAK64QdYDWBJGHlYjN15nFGPCsrGRxUvfZQ6N2Zh67LcDtK2ru2I5NP/8+bHbr/Rs2IVsVnT6JeCfGpkNAOOoMWolCBPDYAagoVW5defSyu1Yoq67NQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710927464; c=relaxed/simple; bh=i7pRuGe87StRsm712YwBq02qI/7d1zAPVVMZIe3sL5Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ec/8F9v9CJLDM7UjeGlqNf+i+ukgbf8P3CLwq0jPgt8K6imp/NOadyeh6jFBiLGy+mQBN329WgmlyuBLZzKlyomE8YBjUjzxzwfAaimK1kh7XewKRQJQ4pV9Tnbl86WJwdnmv//RFYFT75wyHTxpc17+eDNov+UIpYhjgxQr75E= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=peff.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.130.231.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net Received: (qmail 11200 invoked by uid 109); 20 Mar 2024 09:37:41 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:37:41 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 16800 invoked by uid 111); 20 Mar 2024 09:37:45 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:37:45 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:37:40 -0400 From: Jeff King To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: "brian m. carlson" , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: [PATCH 2/3] transport-helper: drop "object-format " option Message-ID: <20240320093740.GB2445682@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20240320093226.GA2445531@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240320093226.GA2445531@coredump.intra.peff.net> The documentation in gitremote-helpers.txt claims that helpers should accept an object-format option from Git whose value is either: 1. "true", in which case the helper is merely told that Git understands the special ":object-format" response, and will send it 2. an algorithm name that the helper should use However, Git has never sent the second form, and it's not clear if it would ever be useful. When interacting with a remote Git repository, we generally discover what _their_ object format is, and then decide what to do with a mismatch (where that is currently just "bail out", but could eventually be on-the-fly conversion and interop). And that is true for native protocols, but also for transport helpers like remote-curl that talk to remote Git repositories. There we send back an ":object-format" line telling Git what remote-curl detected on the other side. And this is true even for pushes (since we get it via receive-pack's advertisement). And it is even true for dumb-http, as we guess at the algorithm based on the hash size, due to ac093d0790 (remote-curl: detect algorithm for dumb HTTP by size, 2020-06-19). The one case where it _isn't_ true is dumb-http talking to an empty repository. There we have no clue what the remote hash is, so remote-curl just sends back its default. If we kept the "object-format " form then in theory Git could say "object-format sha256" to change that default. But it doesn't really accomplish anything. We still may or may not be mis-matched with the other side. For a fetch that's OK, since it's by definition a noop. For a push into an empty repository, it might matter (though the dumb http-push DAV code seems happy to clobber a remote sha256 info/refs and corrupt the repository). If we want to pursue making this work, I think we'd be better off improving detection of the object format of empty repositories over dumb-http (e.g., an "info/object-format" file). But what about helpers that _aren't_ talking to another Git repo? Consider something like git-cinnabar, which is converting on the fly to/from hg. Most of the heavy lifting is done by fast-import/export, but some oids may still pass between Git and the helper. Could "object-format " be useful to tell the helper what oids we expect to see? Possibly, but in practice this isn't necessary. Git-cinnabar for example already peeks at the local-repo .git/config to check its object-format (and currently just bails if it is sha256). So I think the "object-format" extension really is only useful for the helper telling Git what object-format it found, and not the other way around. Note that this patch can't break any remote helpers; we're not changing the code on the Git side at all, but just bringing the documentation in line with what Git has always done. It does remove the receiving support in remote-curl.c, but that code was never actually triggered. Signed-off-by: Jeff King --- Documentation/gitremote-helpers.txt | 7 ++----- remote-curl.c | 9 ++------- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/gitremote-helpers.txt b/Documentation/gitremote-helpers.txt index 07c8439a6f..0d3f4f37c2 100644 --- a/Documentation/gitremote-helpers.txt +++ b/Documentation/gitremote-helpers.txt @@ -542,13 +542,10 @@ set by Git if the remote helper has the 'option' capability. transaction. If successful, all refs will be updated, or none will. If the remote side does not support this capability, the push will fail. -'option object-format' {'true'|algorithm}:: - If 'true', indicate that the caller wants hash algorithm information +'option object-format true':: + Indicate that the caller wants hash algorithm information to be passed back from the remote. This mode is used when fetching refs. -+ -If set to an algorithm, indicate that the caller wants to interact with -the remote side using that algorithm. SEE ALSO -------- diff --git a/remote-curl.c b/remote-curl.c index 1161dc7fed..31b02b8840 100644 --- a/remote-curl.c +++ b/remote-curl.c @@ -211,14 +211,9 @@ static int set_option(const char *name, const char *value) options.filter = xstrdup(value); return 0; } else if (!strcmp(name, "object-format")) { - int algo; options.object_format = 1; - if (strcmp(value, "true")) { - algo = hash_algo_by_name(value); - if (algo == GIT_HASH_UNKNOWN) - die("unknown object format '%s'", value); - options.hash_algo = &hash_algos[algo]; - } + if (strcmp(value, "true")) + die(_("unknown value for object-format: %s"), value); return 0; } else { return 1 /* unsupported */;