@@ -169,6 +169,15 @@ size_t bitmap_popcount(struct bitmap *self)
return count;
}
+int bitmap_is_empty(struct bitmap *self)
+{
+ size_t i;
+ for (i = 0; i < self->word_alloc; i++)
+ if (self->words[i])
+ return 0;
+ return 1;
+}
+
int bitmap_equals(struct bitmap *self, struct bitmap *other)
{
struct bitmap *big, *small;
@@ -189,5 +189,6 @@ void bitmap_or_ewah(struct bitmap *self, struct ewah_bitmap *other);
void bitmap_or(struct bitmap *self, const struct bitmap *other);
size_t bitmap_popcount(struct bitmap *self);
+int bitmap_is_empty(struct bitmap *self);
#endif
In a future commit, we will want to check whether or not a bitmap has any bits set in any of its words. The best way to do this (prior to the existence of this patch) is to call `bitmap_popcount()` and check whether the result is non-zero. But this is semi-wasteful, since we do not need to know the exact number of bits set, only whether or not there is at least one of them. Implement a new helper function to check just that. Suggested-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> --- ewah/bitmap.c | 9 +++++++++ ewah/ewok.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)