@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void create_pack_file(const struct object_array *have_obj,
const struct string_list *uri_protocols)
{
struct child_process pack_objects = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
- struct output_state output_state = {0};
+ struct output_state output_state = { { 0 }, 0, 0, 0 };
char progress[128];
char abort_msg[] = "aborting due to possible repository "
"corruption on the remote side.";
@@ -1164,7 +1164,7 @@ void upload_pack(struct upload_pack_options *options)
if (want_obj.nr) {
struct object_array have_obj = OBJECT_ARRAY_INIT;
get_common_commits(&reader, &have_obj, &want_obj);
- create_pack_file(&have_obj, &want_obj, 0);
+ create_pack_file(&have_obj, &want_obj, NULL);
}
}
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> --- Hi Jonathan, If you need to re-roll your 'jt/fetch-cdn-offload' branch, could you please squash this into the relevant patches. (The first hunk into commit a8d662e3da4 ("upload-pack: refactor reading of pack-objects out", 2019-03-08) and the second hunk into commit 820a5361db1 ("upload-pack: send part of packfile response as uri", 2019,-03-08)). [Johannes mentioned 'clang' complaining - I have clang v5.0.1 and it does not issue any warnings for the new initialization.] This patch fixes the following sparse warnings: $ diff psp-out psp-out1 190,191d189 < upload-pack.c:182:45: warning: missing braces around initializer < upload-pack.c:1167:56: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer $ If you don't like the new initializer expression, maybe don't initialize in the declaration and use a traditional: memset(&output_state, 0, sizeof(struct output_state)); instead? Thanks! ATB, Ramsay Jones upload-pack.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)