From patchwork Mon Aug 10 22:29:16 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Jean-No=C3=ABl_Avila_via_GitGitGadget?= X-Patchwork-Id: 11708325 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA15739 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7302076C for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Zuqm5eTF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727979AbgHJW3b (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:29:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44560 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727968AbgHJW33 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:29:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com (mail-wm1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::343]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FAB9C061756 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id g75so564762wme.4 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:29:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:date:subject:fcc :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:to:cc; bh=kcIe1Ke81WWpA0CcEajHDDrvDHODyyfkiE98DE6q6Zo=; b=Zuqm5eTFdONKLLEaQb37IDZfuZmUnGljkQt8C97+JS2DQGdqfu3+3gdtrnyT3JFeah 57zXWHUavdA7xk3PY56k8BUGcNjq8qt68/LBBWWs3vX1RF11Xu7r7G3nn7WU1yaoI7KS bFhAjViOy8FqQn2xzRbOmjSQE37ivrwk+fK1Gyu5vebg6Gc8ZOgHyneEAnyhUUC5ohYZ Bya8iVQe/ETgyAN4lDSKMeVkM0OFzXcB3s2WNJoBT0c95ntCoL2RD8zn26xDObYZnl6H euSQfOhu3HbDCAtMSfu+J7PJclWUs/O/rCevwtLtSjtM90CbHXc0l66W23+tte6EEuFZ zPAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:date :subject:fcc:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:to:cc; bh=kcIe1Ke81WWpA0CcEajHDDrvDHODyyfkiE98DE6q6Zo=; b=Z0oVwUXN01T0O9XVn47CPsge+JK4YM2tur4zAZdhvmE8IfpBMF27Hh93ctxDbsiVzm OhdI4PxNL9ZAYOr+Wkzp8SDzpXc6iwKNakfv2HyHqSdFk4OGFpbNpLBtcNPdmHL9NRaz svjGb3YI7mbQWRgLooeW9iKndglSpEzkvnwI1rwyU9Ck0XJccaS8bPH9b83Tirv9/ZrJ FA0X+57IhEonMHnBSGwMbDsxHyoI821FzKkz0YrwydMbuuDL+zxHv23Fe72GGq3YpJxR PbhZGuHJsilyUP0g8GpmHy85v0H4FqkX8qrRhJeEvHPu7/YyiIPBuGkRIq1MouIzTxsp Nlsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UgEQN610DlFSi8FjBcmpjAnsnAk+kjVE9Yd2BMGb3taAJE0sd gjR+8UWuxUkpjV0AQlJkw6VXyl38 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFrGndCTOJ/9/XffttngkNCXoFvuUQ6ykKbZEVEWPtgW8ZnQrrEwA/IcI0fRupY7R1FDyNVA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b7c2:: with SMTP id h185mr1299325wmf.168.1597098567797; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([13.74.141.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11sm25106993wrq.0.2020.08.10.15.29.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <82e1b0e69671f16e21208b5931c54266f2f743f3.1597098559.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: From: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:29:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 08/11] t6423: add an explanation about why one of the tests does not pass Fcc: Sent MIME-Version: 1.0 To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Elijah Newren , Elijah Newren Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org From: Elijah Newren I had long since forgotten the idea behind this test and why it failed, and took a little while to figure it out. To prevent others from having to spend a similar time on it, add an explanation in the comments. However, the reasoning in the explanation makes me question why I considered it a failure at all. I'm not sure if I had a better reason when I originally wrote it, but for now just add commentary about the possible expectations and why it behaves the way it does right now. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren --- t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh b/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh index bd0f17a3be..2b4a482277 100755 --- a/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh +++ b/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh @@ -2843,6 +2843,14 @@ test_expect_success '9f: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs # Commit A: priority/{alpha,bravo}/$more_files # Commit B: goal/{a,b}/$more_files, goal/c # Expected: priority/{alpha,bravo}/$more_files, priority/c +# We currently fail this test because the directory renames we detect are +# goal/a/ -> priority/alpha/ +# goal/b/ -> priority/bravo/ +# We do not detect +# goal/ -> priority/ +# because of no files found within goal/, and the fact that "a" != "alpha" +# and "b" != "bravo". But I'm not sure it's really a failure given that +# viewpoint... test_setup_9g () { test_create_repo 9g &&