@@ -364,11 +364,11 @@ int is_worktree_being_rebased(const struct worktree *wt,
memset(&state, 0, sizeof(state));
found_rebase = wt_status_check_rebase(wt, &state) &&
- ((state.rebase_in_progress ||
- state.rebase_interactive_in_progress) &&
- state.branch &&
- starts_with(target, "refs/heads/") &&
- !strcmp(state.branch, target + strlen("refs/heads/")));
+ (state.rebase_in_progress ||
+ state.rebase_interactive_in_progress) &&
+ state.branch &&
+ skip_prefix(target, "refs/heads/", &target) &&
+ !strcmp(state.branch, target);
wt_status_state_free_buffers(&state);
return found_rebase;
}
@@ -382,8 +382,8 @@ int is_worktree_being_bisected(const struct worktree *wt,
memset(&state, 0, sizeof(state));
found_bisect = wt_status_check_bisect(wt, &state) &&
state.branch &&
- starts_with(target, "refs/heads/") &&
- !strcmp(state.branch, target + strlen("refs/heads/"));
+ skip_prefix(target, "refs/heads/", &target) &&
+ !strcmp(state.branch, target);
wt_status_state_free_buffers(&state);
return found_bisect;
}
Instead of checking for "refs/heads/" using `starts_with()`, then skipping past "refs/heads/" using `strlen()`, just use `skip_prefix()`. In `is_worktree_being_rebased()`, we can adjust the indentation while we're here and lose a pair of parentheses which isn't needed and which might even make the reader wonder what they're missing and why that grouping is there. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> --- worktree.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)