diff mbox series

[v4,7/7] t6012: make rev-list tests more interesting

Message ID a21febe1128cbaf69f2201598d9efee6f6a4b2d8.1539729393.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Use generation numbers for --topo-order | expand

Commit Message

Linus Arver via GitGitGadget Oct. 16, 2018, 10:36 p.m. UTC
From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>

As we are working to rewrite some of the revision-walk machinery,
there could easily be some interesting interactions between the
options that force topological constraints (--topo-order,
--date-order, and --author-date-order) along with specifying a
path.

Add extra tests to t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh to add coverage of
these interactions. To ensure interesting things occur, alter the
repo data shape to have different orders depending on topo-, date-,
or author-date-order.

When testing using GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH, this assists in covering
the new logic for topo-order walks using generation numbers. The
extra tests can be added indepently.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
---
 t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Jakub Narębski Oct. 23, 2018, 3:48 p.m. UTC | #1
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
>
> As we are working to rewrite some of the revision-walk machinery,
> there could easily be some interesting interactions between the
> options that force topological constraints (--topo-order,
> --date-order, and --author-date-order) along with specifying a
> path.
>
> Add extra tests to t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh to add coverage of
> these interactions. To ensure interesting things occur, alter the
> repo data shape to have different orders depending on topo-, date-,
> or author-date-order.

Very nice, though I have noticed (please correct me if I am wrong) that
in all cases path limited query always have the same result for
--topo-order and for --date-order; as opposed to three different results
for three different revision sorting modes for path-less query.

>
> When testing using GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH, this assists in covering
> the new logic for topo-order walks using generation numbers. The
> extra tests can be added indepently.

Good.  I guess we are mainly interested in tests without limits and
exclusions, i.e. A or A B and not A..B or A...B walks.

>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh b/t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh
> index b5a1190ffe..a10f0df02b 100755
> --- a/t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh
> +++ b/t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh
> @@ -12,6 +12,22 @@ unnote () {
>  	git name-rev --tags --stdin | sed -e "s|$OID_REGEX (tags/\([^)]*\)) |\1 |g"
>  }
>  
> +#
> +# Create a test repo with interesting commit graph:
> +#
> +# A--B----------G--H--I--K--L
> +#  \  \           /     /
> +#   \  \         /     /
> +#    C------E---F     J
> +#        \_/
> +#
> +# The commits are laid out from left-to-right starting with
> +# the root commit A and terminating at the tip commit L.

Do I understand it correctly that it is a visualization of history
created by existing code (which is a very nice to have)?

> +#
> +# There are a few places where we adjust the commit date or
> +# author date to make the --topo-order, --date-order, and
> +# --author-date-order flags produce different output.

Sidenote: it looks like "a few places" is "one place" for now...

> +
>  test_expect_success setup '
>  	echo "Hi there" >file &&
>  	echo "initial" >lost &&
> @@ -21,10 +37,18 @@ test_expect_success setup '
>  
>  	git branch other-branch &&
>  
> +	git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/unrelated &&
> +	git rm -f "*" &&
> +	echo "Unrelated branch" >side &&
> +	git add side &&
> +	test_tick && git commit -m "Side root" &&
> +	note J &&
> +	git checkout master &&

I see that this fragment is moved earlier, but I don't know what
consequences it does have.

> +
>  	echo "Hello" >file &&
>  	echo "second" >lost &&
>  	git add file lost &&
> -	test_tick && git commit -m "Modified file and lost" &&
> +	test_tick && GIT_AUTHOR_DATE=$(($test_tick + 120)) git commit -m "Modified file and lost" &&
>  	note B &&

Nice trick, though I think it produces slightly unrealistic history (at
least in absence of the clock skew).  Author dates are ordinarily
earlier or equal to commit dates, and commits can be authored in
different order that they were committed.

>  
>  	git checkout other-branch &&
> @@ -63,13 +87,6 @@ test_expect_success setup '
>  	test_tick && git commit -a -m "Final change" &&
>  	note I &&
>  
> -	git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/unrelated &&
> -	git rm -f "*" &&
> -	echo "Unrelated branch" >side &&
> -	git add side &&
> -	test_tick && git commit -m "Side root" &&
> -	note J &&
> -
>  	git checkout master &&
>  	test_tick && git merge --allow-unrelated-histories -m "Coolest" unrelated &&
>  	note K &&
> @@ -103,14 +120,24 @@ check_result () {
>  	check_outcome success "$@"
>  }
>  
> -check_result 'L K J I H G F E D C B A' --full-history
> +check_result 'L K J I H F E D C G B A' --full-history --topo-order
> +check_result 'L K I H G F E D C B J A' --full-history
> +check_result 'L K I H G F E D C B J A' --full-history --date-order
> +check_result 'L K I H G F E D B C J A' --full-history --author-date-order
>  check_result 'K I H E C B A' --full-history -- file
>  check_result 'K I H E C B A' --full-history --topo-order -- file
>  check_result 'K I H E C B A' --full-history --date-order -- file
> +check_result 'K I H E B C A' --full-history --author-date-order -- file
>  check_result 'I E C B A' --simplify-merges -- file
> +check_result 'I E C B A' --simplify-merges --topo-order -- file
> +check_result 'I E C B A' --simplify-merges --date-order -- file
> +check_result 'I E B C A' --simplify-merges --author-date-order -- file
>  check_result 'I B A' -- file
>  check_result 'I B A' --topo-order -- file
> +check_result 'I B A' --date-order -- file
> +check_result 'I B A' --author-date-order -- file
>  check_result 'H' --first-parent -- another-file
> +check_result 'H' --first-parent --topo-order -- another-file
>  
>  check_result 'E C B A' --full-history E -- lost
>  test_expect_success 'full history simplification without parent' '

More tests, looks good.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh b/t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh
index b5a1190ffe..a10f0df02b 100755
--- a/t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh
+++ b/t/t6012-rev-list-simplify.sh
@@ -12,6 +12,22 @@  unnote () {
 	git name-rev --tags --stdin | sed -e "s|$OID_REGEX (tags/\([^)]*\)) |\1 |g"
 }
 
+#
+# Create a test repo with interesting commit graph:
+#
+# A--B----------G--H--I--K--L
+#  \  \           /     /
+#   \  \         /     /
+#    C------E---F     J
+#        \_/
+#
+# The commits are laid out from left-to-right starting with
+# the root commit A and terminating at the tip commit L.
+#
+# There are a few places where we adjust the commit date or
+# author date to make the --topo-order, --date-order, and
+# --author-date-order flags produce different output.
+
 test_expect_success setup '
 	echo "Hi there" >file &&
 	echo "initial" >lost &&
@@ -21,10 +37,18 @@  test_expect_success setup '
 
 	git branch other-branch &&
 
+	git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/unrelated &&
+	git rm -f "*" &&
+	echo "Unrelated branch" >side &&
+	git add side &&
+	test_tick && git commit -m "Side root" &&
+	note J &&
+	git checkout master &&
+
 	echo "Hello" >file &&
 	echo "second" >lost &&
 	git add file lost &&
-	test_tick && git commit -m "Modified file and lost" &&
+	test_tick && GIT_AUTHOR_DATE=$(($test_tick + 120)) git commit -m "Modified file and lost" &&
 	note B &&
 
 	git checkout other-branch &&
@@ -63,13 +87,6 @@  test_expect_success setup '
 	test_tick && git commit -a -m "Final change" &&
 	note I &&
 
-	git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/unrelated &&
-	git rm -f "*" &&
-	echo "Unrelated branch" >side &&
-	git add side &&
-	test_tick && git commit -m "Side root" &&
-	note J &&
-
 	git checkout master &&
 	test_tick && git merge --allow-unrelated-histories -m "Coolest" unrelated &&
 	note K &&
@@ -103,14 +120,24 @@  check_result () {
 	check_outcome success "$@"
 }
 
-check_result 'L K J I H G F E D C B A' --full-history
+check_result 'L K J I H F E D C G B A' --full-history --topo-order
+check_result 'L K I H G F E D C B J A' --full-history
+check_result 'L K I H G F E D C B J A' --full-history --date-order
+check_result 'L K I H G F E D B C J A' --full-history --author-date-order
 check_result 'K I H E C B A' --full-history -- file
 check_result 'K I H E C B A' --full-history --topo-order -- file
 check_result 'K I H E C B A' --full-history --date-order -- file
+check_result 'K I H E B C A' --full-history --author-date-order -- file
 check_result 'I E C B A' --simplify-merges -- file
+check_result 'I E C B A' --simplify-merges --topo-order -- file
+check_result 'I E C B A' --simplify-merges --date-order -- file
+check_result 'I E B C A' --simplify-merges --author-date-order -- file
 check_result 'I B A' -- file
 check_result 'I B A' --topo-order -- file
+check_result 'I B A' --date-order -- file
+check_result 'I B A' --author-date-order -- file
 check_result 'H' --first-parent -- another-file
+check_result 'H' --first-parent --topo-order -- another-file
 
 check_result 'E C B A' --full-history E -- lost
 test_expect_success 'full history simplification without parent' '