| Message ID | patch-03.10-3a7dd917d9f-20211006T094705Z-avarab@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | leak tests: mark more tests as passing | expand |
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes: > Mark "t000-init.sh" as passing when git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak. "t0000-init.sh", I think. Why should we have a separate one for this script, rather than it being a part of [01/10]? > > It'll now be whitelisted as running under the > "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" test mode (the "linux-leaks" CI > target). > > Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> > --- > t/t0001-init.sh | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/t/t0001-init.sh b/t/t0001-init.sh > index df544bb321f..7603ad2f82b 100755 > --- a/t/t0001-init.sh > +++ b/t/t0001-init.sh > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > > test_description='git init' > > +TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true > . ./test-lib.sh > > check_config () {
On Thu, Oct 07 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes: > >> Mark "t000-init.sh" as passing when git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak. > > "t0000-init.sh", I think. Why should we have a separate one for > this script, rather than it being a part of [01/10]? I figured t0000-init.sh was big & scary compared to the rest, but will squash.
diff --git a/t/t0001-init.sh b/t/t0001-init.sh index df544bb321f..7603ad2f82b 100755 --- a/t/t0001-init.sh +++ b/t/t0001-init.sh @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ test_description='git init' +TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true . ./test-lib.sh check_config () {
Mark "t000-init.sh" as passing when git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak. It'll now be whitelisted as running under the "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" test mode (the "linux-leaks" CI target). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> --- t/t0001-init.sh | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)