@@ -828,9 +828,13 @@ struct module_cb {
struct object_id oid_src;
struct object_id oid_dst;
char status;
- const char *sm_path;
+ char *sm_path;
};
#define MODULE_CB_INIT { 0 }
+static void module_cb_release(struct module_cb *mcb)
+{
+ free(mcb->sm_path);
+}
struct module_cb_list {
struct module_cb **entries;
@@ -838,6 +842,19 @@ struct module_cb_list {
};
#define MODULE_CB_LIST_INIT { 0 }
+static void module_cb_list_release(struct module_cb_list *mcbl)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mcbl->nr; i++) {
+ struct module_cb *mcb = mcbl->entries[i];
+
+ module_cb_release(mcb);
+ free(mcb);
+ }
+ free(mcbl->entries);
+}
+
struct summary_cb {
int argc;
const char **argv;
@@ -1183,6 +1200,7 @@ static int compute_summary_module_list(struct object_id *head_oid,
cleanup:
strvec_clear(&diff_args);
release_revisions(&rev);
+ module_cb_list_release(&list);
return ret;
}
Fix leaks in "struct module_cb_list" and the "struct module_cb" which it contains, these fixes leaks in e83e3333b57 (submodule: port submodule subcommand 'summary' from shell to C, 2020-08-13). The "sm_path" should always have been a "char *", not a "const char *", we always create it with xstrdup(). We can't mark any tests passing passing with SANITIZE=leak using "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" as a result of this change, but "t7401-submodule-summary.sh" gets closer to passing as a result of this change. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> --- builtin/submodule--helper.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)