@@ -674,6 +674,7 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix)
N_("suppress duplicate entries")),
OPT_END()
};
+ int ret = 0;
if (argc == 2 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h"))
usage_with_options(ls_files_usage, builtin_ls_files_options);
@@ -777,16 +778,12 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix)
if (show_resolve_undo)
show_ru_info(the_repository->index);
- if (ps_matched) {
- int bad;
- bad = report_path_error(ps_matched, &pathspec);
- if (bad)
- fprintf(stderr, "Did you forget to 'git add'?\n");
-
- return bad ? 1 : 0;
+ if (ps_matched && report_path_error(ps_matched, &pathspec)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Did you forget to 'git add'?\n");
+ ret = 1;
}
dir_clear(&dir);
free(max_prefix);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ test_description='ls-files tests with relative paths
This test runs git ls-files with various relative path arguments.
'
+TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success 'prepare' '
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ This test runs git ls-files --error-unmatch to ensure it correctly
returns an error when a non-existent path is provided on the command
line.
'
+
+TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success 'setup' '
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
test_description='Test of git add, including the -- option.'
+TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
. ./test-lib.sh
# Test the file mode "$1" of the file "$2" in the index.
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
test_description='reset --hard unmerged'
+TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success setup '
Fix an edge case that was missed when the dir_clear() call was added in eceba532141 (dir: fix problematic API to avoid memory leaks, 2020-08-18), we need to also clean up when we're about to exit with non-zero. That commit says, on the topic of the dir_clear() API and UNLEAK(): [...]two of them clearly thought about leaks since they had an UNLEAK(dir) directive, which to me suggests that the method to free the data was too unclear. I think that 0e5bba53af7 (add UNLEAK annotation for reducing leak false positives, 2017-09-08) which added the UNLEAK() makes it clear that that wasn't the case, rather it was the desire to avoid the complexity of freeing the memory at the end of the program. This does add a bit of complexity, but I think it's worth it to just fix these leaks when it's easy in built-ins. It allows them to serve as canaries for underlying APIs that shouldn't be leaking, it encourages us to make those freeing APIs nicer for all their users, and it prevents other leaking regressions by being able to mark the entire test as TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> --- builtin/ls-files.c | 13 +++++-------- t/t3005-ls-files-relative.sh | 1 + t/t3020-ls-files-error-unmatch.sh | 2 ++ t/t3700-add.sh | 1 + t/t7104-reset-hard.sh | 1 + 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)