Message ID | pull.957.v2.git.1621416530195.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] docs: improve fast-forward in glossary content | expand |
"Reuven Y. via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > From: Reuven Y <robi@post.jce.ac.il> > > The text was somewhat confusing between the revision itself and the autour, > improved through a discussion with @Junio > Sorry but I am not @Junio. > - <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update to his > - revision. This will happen frequently on a > + <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update your branch to point at the same > + revision as the branch you are merging. This will happen frequently on a Hmph, I sense a broken indentation. I'll fix it up, so no need for resending only to fix this. Thanks. > <<def_remote_tracking_branch,remote-tracking branch>> of a remote > <<def_repository,repository>>. > > > base-commit: bf949ade81106fbda068c1fdb2c6fd1cb1babe7e
diff --git a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt index 67c7a50b96a0..a22cef39fab0 100644 --- a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt +++ b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt @@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ current branch integrates with) obviously do not work, as there is no <<def_revision,revision>> and you are "merging" another <<def_branch,branch>>'s changes that happen to be a descendant of what you have. In such a case, you do not make a new <<def_merge,merge>> - <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update to his - revision. This will happen frequently on a + <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update your branch to point at the same + revision as the branch you are merging. This will happen frequently on a <<def_remote_tracking_branch,remote-tracking branch>> of a remote <<def_repository,repository>>.