Message ID | 20221006225121.826257-1-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Delay disabling GuC scheduling of an idle context | expand |
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 23:56 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > Patch Details > Series: Delay disabling GuC scheduling of an idle context URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/109466/ State: > failure Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_109466v1/index.html > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12223 -> Patchwork_109466v1SummaryFAILURE > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_109466v1 absolutely need to be > verified manually. > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_109466v1, please notify your bug team to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_109466v1/index.html > Participating hosts (42 -> 40)Missing (2): fi-ctg-p8600 fi-hsw-4200u > Possible new issuesHere are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_109466v1: > IGT changesPossible regressions * igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate:fi-bdw-gvtdvm: PASS -> DMESG-WARN I believe this is unrelated failure since the series was only changing guc code paths and this is a BDW test. Additionally, the warning reported was about a memory-free while a lock was held but the mutex being reported was nothing to do with GuC while the series being tested is only every adding code that use or depend on guc->context_lookup or ce->guc_state.lock .
I verified that 2 of the 3 the errors reported below are on platforms that don't support GuC and the dmesgs confirm guc was disabled. The remaining ICL one, we know ICL doesnt support GuC .. also, additionally, the error was on a display IGT where CRCs were failing. That said these errors I believe are unrelated. ...alan On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 18:02 +0000, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: Delay disabling GuC scheduling of an idle context (rev2) URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/109466/ State: failure Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_109466v2/index.html CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12295_full -> Patchwork_109466v2_full Summary FAILURE Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_109466v2_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_109466v2_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Participating hosts (9 -> 11) Additional (2): shard-rkl shard-dg1 Possible new issues Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_109466v2_full: IGT changes Possible regressions * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck: * shard-skl: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_109466v2/shard-skl7/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html> +1 similar issue * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@c-edp1: * shard-skl: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12295/shard-skl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@c-edp1.html> -> INCOMPLETE<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_109466v2/shard-skl3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@c-edp1.html> * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-render: * shard-iclb: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12295/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-render.html> -> FAIL<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_109466v2/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-render.html> Suppressed The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses. They do not affect the overall result. * igt@sysfs_preempt_timeout@idempotent@rcs0: * {shard-dg1}: NOTRUN -> FAIL<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_109466v2/shard-dg1-18/igt@sysfs_preempt_timeout@idempotent@rcs0.html> +4 similar issues Known issues