Message ID | 20231010121545.1046793-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add drm_dbg_ratelimited() | expand |
On 10/10/2023 05:15, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi, > > I might have picked up the wrong series and missed some reviews > and the extra patch from Nirmoy with a real use of the > drm_dbg_ratelimited() that John was looking for. > > Thanks, > Andi I just found the original post of this from back in January (https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112925/). Is there a reason why it was never merged? As noted, it appears to have a whole bunch of r-b's on it. John. > v2: > pick the right patch with the following changes: > - add more r-b's > - add a patch 2 where the drm_dbg_ratelimited is actually used. > > Nirmoy Das (2): > drm/print: Add drm_dbg_ratelimited > drm/i915: Ratelimit debug log in vm_fault_ttm > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 5 +++-- > include/drm/drm_print.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >
Hi John, On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:25:03AM -0700, John Harrison wrote: > On 10/10/2023 05:15, Andi Shyti wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I might have picked up the wrong series and missed some reviews > > and the extra patch from Nirmoy with a real use of the > > drm_dbg_ratelimited() that John was looking for. > > > > Thanks, > > Andi > I just found the original post of this from back in January > (https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112925/). Is there a reason why it > was never merged? As noted, it appears to have a whole bunch of r-b's on it. yes, the patch was widely appreciated by reviewers... but I think somehow it was forgotten... that's why I am resending it :-) Andi
Hi, > I might have picked up the wrong series and missed some reviews > and the extra patch from Nirmoy with a real use of the > drm_dbg_ratelimited() that John was looking for. just a kind reminder. Andi